M
mark1971a
New member
JR thank you for the intrest. I had a number of projects, that were displayed. They are were suffering real bad from quality degradation. They were not examples of anything particularly , but the problem in capturing the signal. I removed them because they were not necessary , and were not getting the point across. One guy was tunnel vision on the reverb. That had nothing to do with the point I was trying to make. It became confusing to have audio examples. I drew it.
If I recorded as wav's , enough of the signal was "wavey" looking, and could be mixed together to master. Before rendered as MP3 64 fast, it was a terrible saw toothy looking signal that could not be layered in mix (in my opinion).
This is not a analog vs DAW type thread. I am blown away but what you can do in/with the DAW. Most of my textbooks and seminars attended were when cakewalk first came out circa 89? So things have changed a bit with the technical aspects. 3 or 4 times a year I arm the mic and sing or strum some ideas.
Yes latest asio 4 all was used. We straightened that out.
I need no new input and the poster who said abandon thread is right. Problem solved.
If I recorded as wav's , enough of the signal was "wavey" looking, and could be mixed together to master. Before rendered as MP3 64 fast, it was a terrible saw toothy looking signal that could not be layered in mix (in my opinion).
This is not a analog vs DAW type thread. I am blown away but what you can do in/with the DAW. Most of my textbooks and seminars attended were when cakewalk first came out circa 89? So things have changed a bit with the technical aspects. 3 or 4 times a year I arm the mic and sing or strum some ideas.
Yes latest asio 4 all was used. We straightened that out.
I need no new input and the poster who said abandon thread is right. Problem solved.
Last edited: