Copyright

  • Thread starter Thread starter CANINE704
  • Start date Start date
C

CANINE704

New member
I understand that I can copyright all of my songs under one form..but my question is can I send in a cd with accapellas of my songs for copyright?...or do I have to write them all out on paper?....Thanks
 
You must enclose lyric sheets of all your songs you are including to be copyrighted, no matter which media you use to submit them on.
 
Pardon me...You DO NOT have to include lyric sheets to register a copyright, although they WILL accept them, and YES you can send a cd with whatever you want as long as the words are clearly discernable. If you don't have a melody you may register the song as "Words only".
 
http://www.copyright.gov/

there's a FAQ here



yes you can submit on CD.......

yes you can sing it accapella...that way the words and melody will be covered.......

you dont have to enclose lyric sheets, but i dont see any reason why you wouldnt.......

use form PA......
 
Anyone who submits copyright registration for a cd or tape without enclosing lyric sheets does so at their own risk. Copyrights registrations without lyric sheets and with questionable audio legibility have been held insufficient by several different district courts in the 9th Circuit. If you're going to all the trouble and expense to register your copyright, why take chances?
 
Interesting stuff Pete, your pointy is well taken. Where can I read up on the cases you just mentioned?
 
Pete I understand but that is your opinion I asked a "just the facts kind of question" Im fresh off of a call with the copyright office and YOU CAN SEND IN AN ACCAPELLA CD...Thanks for everyones help on this subject
 
Until 2 years ago the Copyright Office itself recommended enclosing lyric sheets with all recorded submittals to establish authorship. While it's not required, it is the best practice. As of last May, at least, some Registrar employees were still encouraging people to suibmit lyric sheets because it makes their job much easier.

Re the court cases, district court cases are chosen for publication in the Federal Supplement. I don't know if any of the cases have been published, but if they have been you could find them in slip opinions there, or more likely in Federal Rules Service Reporter because I think the cases were decided on Rule 56 motions for summary judgement. I'm sure they are included in some specialized newsletters or journals, but I haven't seen them in any. The ones I'm aware came out of Federal District Courts in Tucson and Los Angeles and the judges ruled that there was no infringement without clear and convincing evidence of the lyrical content of a song. I read about the cases in one of the news services available on Usenet News via Washurn College of Law Library at www.washlaw.edu.

To me it's still a question of common sense. Why go to the trouble of registering your copyright and then shoot yourself in the foot by leaving a loophole that may invalidate the registratioon, or at least, the content of the lyrics? Why take that risk when there is so little effort involved?

While lyric sheet inclusion is my opinion, it's also the opinion of the copyright section of the American Bar Association. In other words, attorneys who specialize in copyright law and represent songwriters and publishers.
 
Last edited:
I just love Copyright in Australia.... no forms, no fees.. just write on the bottom of a lyric sheet or a CD:

(c) Name Year

and it's Copyrighted!!!

Porter
 
It is the same in the U.S.

The copyright exists as soon as the work is set down in any form -- written, an audio recording, etc.

Registering a song that is not being shopped by a publisher does nothing except make you $30 poorer. Contrary to popular belief among amateurs, there are simply not a lot of people out there looking to steal songs from unknown writers.

Maguire
 
DC - I understand you're sentiment, but disagree for several reasons under certain circumstances -

1] Unpublished songwriters who actively shop songs to publishers, performers, managers, producers, et,al. should have the songs they pitch copyrighted. While most people in these professions are honest, ethical people, accidents do happen. Tapes and Cds get duplicated without the writer's name, address, etc.

2] People who are asked by publishers, managers, et.al to co-write with people who they don't know or know well. It's nice to have proof that Two-Chord Johnny really didn't write all that he claims to. This is probably the most commonly litigated issue in cases involving songwriting currently.

3] Anyone who performs their unpublished songs at songwriter showcases, writer's nights, open mikes, etc.

If you're writing songs to impress your wife or girlfriend or to have people pat you on the back, maybe a registered copyright isn't so important. But, if you're trying to make a living from your writing, copyright registration isn't such bad idea or a waste of $30.00.
 
bdbdbuck said:
DC,
Would you post an unregistered song on the internet?

bd
Click to expand...

I do.....

The law states...
copyright for original material is in effect upon creation....
registering your songs is a safeguard for legal issues and for
publishing reasons......

I have heard a recent rumor of an individual who stole a song from someone who had posted it on-line....
The song was cut by a magor artist...
upon discovery....the real writer filed suit...
the court took the on-line posting date of the original as proof of ownership.....so I have heard....just a rumor so far....

If true,
Posting your lyric/song on-line would be a free form of copyright...
provided that the files remain intact and dated...

this would be very cool but, I still register all my finished tunes in parcels of five to ten or so....
It's almost time to write another check too....
 
This is very interesting. However, on a different style. What about someone who writes a song (such as myself) who does not read of write music and does just instrumentals? There is no real way, other than someone transcribing to get the sheet music.

I'm not saying my music is going to make the top 100, but I do place much online. I also heard many years ago (perhaps rumor) that a simple copywrite for those short on cash but wanting a copywrite was to send a CD or other media to yourself via the postal service and leave the contents unopened (obviously). This gives a goverment stamp with date. Course this only works if you keep your music on the deck and post it after you get your CD back in the mail.

Just my two cents. ;)
 
joro said:

If true,
Posting your lyric/song on-line would be a free form of copyright...
provided that the files remain intact and dated...
Click to expand...

Only problem here is file dates on a computer can be modified forward and even backwards. I would like to know if you find out anything on this, but I would have to say it would more than likely be rumor since this can happen.

Just mho.
 
I guess my point is, why would you want to take the chance of the court not upholding any alternate method you may have used. My stuff will probably never hit the charts either, but I feel a lot more confident about exposure knowing the songs I expose are registered. I think $30 is pretty cheap insurance.

bd
 
bdbdbuck said:
I think $30 is pretty cheap insurance.
bd
Click to expand...

This is very true. A $30.00 copywrite is much better, but honestly the fact remains that not everyone has $30.00 to put out there on something the might happen.

Mainly for myself I was posting information that 'could' save your hide and just in case. It's a lot cheaper than $30.00 and when you get a complete CD then you can submit that to the copywrite office.

We all need to save money, but still protect our creativity. ;)
 
Yes -- I have posted my stuff online, though I only make the URL available to those with whom I want to share the work.

All of the various forms of "poor man's copyright" are nothing but urban legend. They provide no more protection than what the law already allows.

DCMaguire
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top