What the hell does "analog recording" mean anyhow
Hi Weston, (forgive me, cause I know you know this)and you know that it doesn't make a shit of a difference to me, cause I want to lay tracks at your studio, and yours is digital. Correct? And that is the point. I will mix the digital tracks with my analog MSR-16 tracks later in my studio. It is your acoustics I am after. So for those of you who don't know what it means:
Sources Voice/instruments-anything that moves air molecules-analog (includes speakers)or any thing that excites a preamp such as keyboards, computer sound cards, other tape machines, or coils such as electric guitars and bass's
and anything that can produce an analog sine wave, even CD players, video tape machines,microphones,drum machines etc.- all are analog(at the analog line outs be it, line level, mic level or amp output levels.
Preamp-analog (insert analog to digital converter for digital)
Recording media-magnetic tape(analog)-(insert data encoding to memory for digital)
playback media-magnetic tape(analog)-(insert data retrieving, decoding and digital to analog conversion for digital)
preamp-analog output
amp-analog output
speaker-analog
ears-analog
Unfortunately anything on the net has been converted to digital, and unless the listener has access to an analog duplication of the performance(tape,lp) all modern marketplace duplications for the majority will be digital. Hence the statement in another thread that "we must all convert at some point, because its a digital world".
I don't.
And that is REALLY the heart of the analog/digital preference controversy. IF and I do mean IF, you are planning on recording for the marketplace, you or your client WILL have to convert, regardless if you begin the process in analog and track to tape, and even mix to tape. If you are only recording for yourself and friends and even clients who want an analog media for mastering to digital, you can stay in the analog format, by mixing to 1/4" or 1/2" tape which is given to the client for mastering, dupeing to cassette for your self and others. Thats the catagory I am in. You can even dump it to your digital method and media of choice. However, as soon as any analog signal is converted to 16 bit CD, or converted to MP3 it has entered the digital world and there it will stay, never to be played in its original state. I don't care what ANYONE says. My ears are terrible, and I still hear the difference. Whether I care or not is the point. Technically, the ear is capable of detecting the movement of one molecule of air, it is the brain of the beholder that either cares or doesn't, and MOST listeners today don't care, beause they don't LISTEN to analog recordings. They just want it "loud". At least, most modern producers "think" they do. Contemporary radio is responsible for that. Mastering house engineers are paid by their clients work. If the client wants it to sound "loud", and the client generates $1,000,000 in billing time a year, the engineer says"your the boss". Unfortunately, as a writer for another forum showed, when mastered at the levels that produce "digitaly loud", then dynamic range becomes a thing of the past. And that is NOT natural. Dynamic range IS what makes a recording seem as good as the real thing. However, modern stuido product sales are not based on "realness" in the literal translation of the word. If it were, half of the "artists" in the world would not be.
Thats another animal. Another thread.
fitz
