SouthSIDE Glen
independentrecording.net
My only dispute, TM, is that you're presenting the point of view that it's OK for you to provide an explanation of something technical, but when your explanations are incomplete or untrue, it's wrong for someone else to correct you. Any entry into "geeky science" (which is what this is, BTW, like it or not) is because you opened the door with your explanation, not because we all of a sudden want to ditch the music and feast on theory. Trust me, most of us will shout until the day we die that it's all about the music, and the rest is secondary.
There no dick waving there, it's just peer review. Yeah there are adolescent dick wavers on this forum, there are dick wavers everywhere. And there are adolescent spitaball shooters here too. There's one of those in every classroom. But for the most part, the people here help each other out. There are some with more experience than others, there are some with stronger suits than others. There are some who type with kid gloves on, and there are those who just tell it like it is (or at least how they see it.) No one person is on top of the heap, and the only ones who care about being on top of the heap are those who you'll learn very quickly have no business being there yet.
You're a smart guy with worthwhile stuff to contribute, TM. But give yourself some time to actually learn the players here. In that other thread you went up against folks like Farview and NL5 (and others who I forget, but would list if I remembered
), who, had you have been here long enough to find out for yourself, are more often than not people worth far more listening to than arguing with, and if you did find yourself in disagreement with them, you'd find both of them to mostly be reasonable people who can participate in honest debate.
May I kindly suggest that you give the participants on this board a chance and that you allow a little give-and-take and not take everything as a personal attack, and you might find out that Farview, NL5, Noisewreck, Lee Rosario, Sonic Albert, Massive Master, MasteringHouse, NYMorningstar, Benny Chico, Harvey Gerst, xstatic, xfinsterx and many others that I apologize for not listing here are not the elite SOBs that some may make them out to be, and that each one is a human with both strengths and weaknesses, and who make this board a far more positive experience than a negative one.
G.
There no dick waving there, it's just peer review. Yeah there are adolescent dick wavers on this forum, there are dick wavers everywhere. And there are adolescent spitaball shooters here too. There's one of those in every classroom. But for the most part, the people here help each other out. There are some with more experience than others, there are some with stronger suits than others. There are some who type with kid gloves on, and there are those who just tell it like it is (or at least how they see it.) No one person is on top of the heap, and the only ones who care about being on top of the heap are those who you'll learn very quickly have no business being there yet.
You're a smart guy with worthwhile stuff to contribute, TM. But give yourself some time to actually learn the players here. In that other thread you went up against folks like Farview and NL5 (and others who I forget, but would list if I remembered
![Wink ;) ;)](/images/smilies/wink.gif)
May I kindly suggest that you give the participants on this board a chance and that you allow a little give-and-take and not take everything as a personal attack, and you might find out that Farview, NL5, Noisewreck, Lee Rosario, Sonic Albert, Massive Master, MasteringHouse, NYMorningstar, Benny Chico, Harvey Gerst, xstatic, xfinsterx and many others that I apologize for not listing here are not the elite SOBs that some may make them out to be, and that each one is a human with both strengths and weaknesses, and who make this board a far more positive experience than a negative one.
G.