
RICK FITZPATRICK
New member
Hello FS. First off, ongrats on the house. After looking at the pics of your studio construction, I saw some things that seemed...well, at least to my mind, a little wierd from an isolation point of view.
I don't know who planned this, or if you are doing the plan and someone else is doing the work or what, but there are some things I don't quite understand. Maybe you can clarify them. If I am correct, I hope you haven't coverd these up yet.
Please don't take offence to my observations. I'm only offering comments that may help you prevent mistakes and insight to some potential problems that you may fix, although, I could be wrong, considering it is awfully difficult to ascertain your actual conditions from a few pictures, not to mention the whole scope of your construction detailing.
What you have done is WEAKEND the transmission loss potential. It is a proven fact that a THREE LEAF system is inferior to a TWO leaf system. Although, without knowing the conditions of the exterior leaf, and if each stud cavity is being vented to the outside, I could be wrong. However, IF, you haven't vented these cavities, you indeed have created a three leaf system
Thats not to say you won't reach your transmission loss goal. Its just saying it could be better, had you understood this principle in the first place.
Second, I see windows framed within the interior shell framing. How are you planning on keeping the TL of the windows at the same TL rating of the
rest of the wall assembly? Unless you are using VERY THICK glass, like 3/4" or so, I believe you have built in a VERY WEAK LINK in the overall scheme, which in terms of $$$$, means you have negated all the work and money spent on the rest of the shell. Again, without knowing your TL goal, I could be spitting in the wind.
Regardless, I believe my assessment is still correct.
Third, in one of the pictures, it appears there are some spacer cleats fastened to the drywall/framing of the exterior shell, which from a common sense point of view, means that these spacers are TOUCHING the interior shell framing, no?
If I am correct, then these connections provide a flanking path for structural transmission DIRECTLY to the exterior shell, which again, will negate all attempts at isolating the interior shell from the exterior shell. Unless there is some kind of "decoupling" agent between the interior framing and the cleat which is not visible in the pics. This concept is so important to isolating an interior room within a room, pro studio builders go to great lengths detailing EVERY connection to the outside world so the WHOLE room is "decoupled" from the exterior shell. Every single component in the "system" needs to be addressed, from HVAC ducts/registers, to door jamb/thresholds to "WALL SWAY" decouplers, not to mention electrical conduits, pipes, and many other "connections", which now brings up the daddy of them all. The floor.
Modern Home studio construction school of thought maintains that MOST home studios do not need a "floating room", as this type of construction is not only HIGHLY difficult to implement correctly, it is also very expensive to do correctly. And without really knowing your TL goal(you do have a goal don't you?) my observations may not have any merit. However, there is something I see that, given a certain TL goal, may also contribute to "weakening" the rest of the "room within a room" construction TL potential. Your slab is also a DIRECT vibration transmission flanking path to the exterior shell. To overcome this problem, the usual method is ISOLATING the interior slab from the exterior shell slab/footing. Not only that, but once you "decouple" the interior slab, usually by cutting the slab with a diamond saw, then, because the weight of the whole "room within a room" structure is carried by a thin floor slab (which from my own experience may fracture the slab), which from a permit point of view, demands a new "footing" must be poured to bear this weight.
I know this comment will do you little good at this point, but it MAY help others who need extreme Transmission Loss construction, and may not understand the problems and inherent "permit" difficulties, not to mention potential "insurance voiding" should this type of construction occur WITHOUT going through the permit process. Not to mention possible fines and legal consequences, INCLUDING DEMOLITION! For those of you in this group who intend on this depth of construction, I HIGHLY advise reading this thread in its ENTIRETY.
http://www.johnlsayers.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=2921
Anyway, take my comments with a grain of salt at this point. They are only intended for others to consider should they be in the PLANNING stage of their future projects. Hope this helps them somewhat, although there are MANY other considerations. BTW, what is your plan on the ceiling and HVAC?
fitZ
fitZ

I don't know who planned this, or if you are doing the plan and someone else is doing the work or what, but there are some things I don't quite understand. Maybe you can clarify them. If I am correct, I hope you haven't coverd these up yet.
Please don't take offence to my observations. I'm only offering comments that may help you prevent mistakes and insight to some potential problems that you may fix, although, I could be wrong, considering it is awfully difficult to ascertain your actual conditions from a few pictures, not to mention the whole scope of your construction detailing.
First off ,when you install the drywall on the interior face of the new construction, you will have created a THREE LEAF SYSTEM!Well I put up sheet rock on the existing extirior walls. Two sheets of half inch with green glue in between. I did three layers in places.


Second, I see windows framed within the interior shell framing. How are you planning on keeping the TL of the windows at the same TL rating of the
rest of the wall assembly? Unless you are using VERY THICK glass, like 3/4" or so, I believe you have built in a VERY WEAK LINK in the overall scheme, which in terms of $$$$, means you have negated all the work and money spent on the rest of the shell. Again, without knowing your TL goal, I could be spitting in the wind.

Third, in one of the pictures, it appears there are some spacer cleats fastened to the drywall/framing of the exterior shell, which from a common sense point of view, means that these spacers are TOUCHING the interior shell framing, no?


Modern Home studio construction school of thought maintains that MOST home studios do not need a "floating room", as this type of construction is not only HIGHLY difficult to implement correctly, it is also very expensive to do correctly. And without really knowing your TL goal(you do have a goal don't you?) my observations may not have any merit. However, there is something I see that, given a certain TL goal, may also contribute to "weakening" the rest of the "room within a room" construction TL potential. Your slab is also a DIRECT vibration transmission flanking path to the exterior shell. To overcome this problem, the usual method is ISOLATING the interior slab from the exterior shell slab/footing. Not only that, but once you "decouple" the interior slab, usually by cutting the slab with a diamond saw, then, because the weight of the whole "room within a room" structure is carried by a thin floor slab (which from my own experience may fracture the slab), which from a permit point of view, demands a new "footing" must be poured to bear this weight.

http://www.johnlsayers.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=2921
Anyway, take my comments with a grain of salt at this point. They are only intended for others to consider should they be in the PLANNING stage of their future projects. Hope this helps them somewhat, although there are MANY other considerations. BTW, what is your plan on the ceiling and HVAC?

fitZ

fitZ