freshmattyp said:
So, maybe you'd like to offer up a different suggestion? Perhaps something in the price range that isn't "a Large diaphragm condenser, Chinese-made, mildly sibilant with scooped mids and hyped highs"?
Yea, I'll give a really good suggestion, in fact. Better yet, I'll give you a method :
1) For starters, get on ebay and pick up
something mostly honest / neutral; less flattering. An Oktava would be a good starting point. MK-319 ... even an MC-012 with a good pop-filter.
2) Next, you'll want to get recording some stuff with it. Pick some material to track that will be indicative of your voice range and the style of music you plan to record. We're talking full mixes, here, too. Track everything so you can get an idea of what your voice will sound like in the context of a mix.
Now, listen back very critically. And as painful as this can be,

compare it with professional recordings over the same monitors. Pick reference material that reflects the kind of vocal styling you are shooting for; something in the same basic vocal range, and that you like and think represents a "good vocal sound."
When comparing, what's sticking out for you about your own tracks? What's missing? Other than talent ... money ... horrible room accoustics (standing waves, etc.); because that's all stuff you can't expect a mic to help with.
3)Now : Pull out the EQ and try and see if you can coax out of your track whatever you feel is missing. For starters, if you're going for a modern, pop-radio style vocal, then chances are you might need a little of high end jimmy ... so start out by boosting at 12 khz. If you're tracking in a less-than-ideal accoustic environment, then you also might need to cut some low-mids, so start futzing a little with the 400 hz range -- wide Q. Maybe your voice needs some more lows, so try boosting around 200 hz, narrow Q.
Once you get things to sound kinda' close to how you want it, then make note of the things you needed to do in order to get part-way there. If you found that there just wasn't enough air, and you had to jack the 12 khz up to infinity in order to get enough shimmer ... then I would start looking at the Rode mics as a good, logical next step. A C1 would qualify, since that's got a very similar sound to it (similar to the Rodes).
Now on the other hand If you:
*found your voice to be too sibilant ... too present on the consonants, and just, overall, would like it to "sit back" and mellow out a bit more
or
* felt that it got buried amongst a background of heavy guitar or other midrange instruments, and just didn't have the necessary midrange imediacy ...
Then I would look at a dynamic as being my next step. In the $200 range, there are plenty of good Electrovoice mics to be had off ebay (RE-15, 16, etc.) or Shure (SM-7 if you're lucky), or maybe just an SM-57 or 58 new.
And finally ... let's assume you listened back ... you like it for the most part, but you:
* just want your vocal track to seem more "real." You like your voice, and you want it to sound the way it does in the room, but maybe with a little extra clarity ...
or you:
* like everything, but just feel it needs a little something extra in the high-mids; you tried boosting 5-6 khz on the EQ, and felt that gave it just that little extra high-midrange cut that it needed ...
Then I would then proceed to purchase either an Audio Technica 4040 ... a Shure KSM-27, or
a CAD M-177.
My reasoning: The mostly flat reference mic will give you a good point of reference. A good middle ground starting point. By focusing on the air frequencies of 10-12 khz, you can get a really good idea of whether or not the Chinese / Rode stuff is for you or not ... because the Chinese / Rode stuff is all about the 12 khz. If you know right away that you don't need that stuff, then that's one "category" of mic that can be scratched off your list.
Now, by focusing on the immediacy of the mic; esses, consonants, beginnnings of words and transient response ... you're kind of deciding whether or not you need a condenser in general. If the esses and consonants on an Oktava are too much for you ... then they'll
definitely be too much for you on something else.

This is probably an obvious sign that you'd be happier with a dynamic. Also, if it sounds too "clean," or if it needs more midrange to poke through some busy or distorted guitar, etc ... that's also a good sign that you might prefer a dynamic (or even a ribbon).
And lasty, I mention the whole 6 khz thing because there's yet another category of condenser where that range is particularly prevelant, and I think of that as being a feature of the "midwest" mic companies. Shure (Illinois), Audio Technica (Ohio), and CAD (also Ohio) ... all seem to have that 5-6 khz boost in common, and it's somewhat indicative of the overall sound. Mostly neutral and realistic, but with that extra bite in the upper-mids.
The kind of bite that can cut right through a mix ... or right through your eardrums
, depending on what kind of voice you're dealing with.
Very, very generally speaking, this last category of Midwest manufacturers is very prevelent with the Indie-rockers due to it's more organic quality (think Wilco, Spoon, etc.). The Chinese / Rode variety tends to be prevelent with pop; think Britney, Averil, etc. or R&B / radio ... due to the extra high end juice. And the dynamics tend to be favored for heavier rock due to the more aggressive / loud nature of the vocalists. Or just for those who prefer a less accurate and more laid-back tone.
Once you're done with the reference / Oktava mic, then I would keep it around because they're good to have. Or if money is an issue, then ebay it for exactly the same as what you originally paid for it.