poo said:
Do you think that most Behringer pre's sound alike?
Mabye some sound shittier than others...
but then again, I think that its all about personal opinion here.
It's our EAR's that are all different.
Our ears, AND Berry's pres, are different...
Behringer can and does make good gear. Unfortunately, they also make crappy gear. The Quality Control department is supposed to keep the crap from getting out. QC seems to be their biggest failing.
I checked out a couple of their units. A
Eurorack MX602a and a Eurorack MX802a. There shoudln't be any differences between them except for size, number of channels/pres, and features. But...
The 602's pres got hissy in a hurry. Almost anything past "-10" was heading down to Shitty Sound City. White-noise-a-rama. The phantom power would not shut off, no matter how long you waited for the LED to dim. The power supply had bent pins. The knobs were set at all different tensions. It felt "cheap-o". It went back.
I tried the 802, figuring it's a good deal and that perhaps the 602 I had was just a junk model. Apparently so!
The pres on the 802 had much more ususable gain. Nothing you could use a ribbon on
, but something you can get good sound out of your 57s with. The power supply was in good shape and was much a beefier unit. The knobs were tensioned properly. The phantom power works as advertised (I' havent volt-metereed it though). Sound going into the hard drive from the unit sounds good. The quality difference of the parts, before taking into account the better QC, was very evident. For the extra $30 you get a much better unit overall.
I'm not gonna say that a Berry will compare to a high-end pre/console... but I've heard nice recordings come out of them.
I think MISTERQCUE got burned hard by Berry QC back in the day. I can see him itching to rant
. IMHO (and I'm no pro): A good Berry ain't bad. But it can be hard to find the good Berry.