That is exactly why I like this particular piece of software. If it were available to me, I would have it. The mundane, every song you write, same every time things.
I know what my voice sounds like. I know what I have to do to make it sound where I want it. It takes some tweaking for each song, but I have a preset that I use. Makes my voice sound like my voice (what people are used to hearing on my tracks).
I know what my bass sounds like, and how my playing makes it sound. I have a preset for that. Same EQ, same compressor with the same settings that I put on the bass bridge. Same two tracks that have the same crossover point that I use to emulate a 1x18 cab and a 4x10 cab into that bus. If it's a faster rock song, I have a preset for a track to mirror the bass with my piano. Some of the slower songs have a Subtractor patch that does a sub harmonic mirror of the bass line.
I've spent 100s of hours getting to this point on each of those preset sets. I still tweak each one after it's in the mix, but they both start out life in every mix pretty much the same. And on and on for each track, there are presets that I start with and then move on. If I didn't do this, every track would take 100s of hours (at my skill level).
This software intends (and maybe it will be a couple iterations down the road) to do that for you in a few minutes. Like an electric assistant that knows what you do with each song and sets it up for you. You are still in control. You can still tweak what it does, or scrap it altogether. You can still start all over from scratch. You can still have complete control of what's going on with your tracks, but it gives you
suggestions. To a 30 year vet, an assistant (electronic or otherwise) would probably be a nuisance. To someone who's got a few years invested and doesn't want to do all the mundane every single time, this could be a great starting point.
I will wholeheartedly agree that someone who buys this, plugs their music in and lets it do all the work is a hack and not interested in learning at all. Again, that doesn't bother me. It's THEIR music they're doing that to. IF it comes out sounding okay-ish, great. Good on 'em. But likely it will be as noticeable as auto mastering software.
You say YOU can't view... And I agree with the statement, totally. But there are some who'd like to skip some of the steps. If THEY view some of the steps as mundane chores and necessities to get their music out, then by all means, let them get Roombas to bypass those "chores". I don't believe what comes out will be in competition with Greg or Rami or Bat or Andrus or dozens of others here that are doing the entire job for themselves, and doing all the aspects well. Again, it boils down to people having different levels of apathy about different aspects of the process.
Trust me, I'm not done learning by any stretch, but I'd be happy to have this software to help me learn...and to do the vacuuming, please!.