anyone had experience with Marshall mic's

  • Thread starter Thread starter amala
  • Start date Start date
A

amala

New member
I have 2 mxl 603s Marshall mic's and I'm very happy with them on overheads, but I was checking those large diaphragm mics and wondering if they are any good??

What about their tube mic's??

Any luck??
 
There are several people on this site that have the V67 and seem to like it. I have 2 and for the price they are very decent.

I've never tried or heard the tube mics
 
All I've ever used is their MLX2001P condenser mic a few years ago. Crisp, but rather harsh in the high end. You get what you pay for...they're pretty low cost.
 
I'll give a thumbs up to the V67. I also have a SP B1 and I think they are different enough to compliment each other.

Dennis
 
I agree with Drummerbones, they´re cheap mics, I got 1 MXL990, need a lot of care, I think they´re constructed not to last long. This toy fell twice into the floor and is all worn, nothing to do with the SM57. You could use it to defense yourself against bad drummers:D
 
MXL mics

Yes the Mxl mic are pretty good mics, I have the V77 tube mic which I run through a dbx 386 or Joe Meek VC!Q and I get Great results.
 
Re: MXL mics

track one said:
Yes the Mxl mic are pretty good mics, I have the V77 tube mic which I run through a dbx 386 or Joe Meek VC!Q and I get Great results.



Track one,

Do you have any tunes up on the web using the V77? Ive been wondering how that mic sounds. Heck Im in Gilbert Az maybe Ill swing by and hear it in person.

Thanks,
Justin
 
MXL 1006

I use 2 MXL 1006 as overheads. I tried them on guitars, bass, vocals.... and, so-so. In fact, I really want to sell them and get the SP C4 kit.

I dont really like my MXLs.. But this is the only MXL model I ever used so, cant tell what I think about all the other models!
 
The mxl 603 is one of the best mics for accoustic guitar under $500 I can think of. It's one of those rare audio no-brainers.

I've owned the mxl v67, as well as the mxl 2003. The v67 I liked at first, but after a while it kind of fell out of favor -- a little muddy and indescript . . . not very smooth or present, and the pickup pattern is so wide as to border on omni . . . so not a very tight or focused sound, either. The proximity effect is so exaggerated as to make it nearly useless without a lot of bass-cutting. Probably just the thing, though, if you have a super-wimpy mousy kind of voice, I suppose.

The 2003 I liked somewhat better, but after a while, I sort of noticed it's just a very bright mic, and not particularly smooth, either, particularly in those high frequencies. Not nearly as bad, mind you, as the 2001 or some other cheapy condenser, mind you, but still not to my liking.

They've both been gone for some time now, but the 603 remains one of my favorites. I've never been unhappy with a single accoustic guitar track, and I like them as drum overheads on occasion (when I need a brighter, more defined cymbal or hi-hat sound).

The one I hear about a lot these days from some of my comrades is the v69. Supposedly a surprizingly good, inexpensive tube mic.
 
I have a v67g and in my opinion it's amazing on male vocals! It's not a great match with some voice types though, although I haven't used it on enough different ones to be able to give you specifics.

What application are you looking into the LD condensers for?
 
I've got a pair of V67's..I've never had any luck with them but my partener uses 'em..he seems to dig them.We also have a V69 I like this one on elec. guitars quite a bit..Havent had the chance to use it extensively on vox yet..



Don
 
I have a V93M (nearly identical to the 2003). Considering that the price includes the shockmount it is darn good value. It is very detailed. Most folks describe the 67 as a very good vocal mic. I would describe the 93 and an instrumental or vocal mic. It isn't bad at vocals, but some might find it too unforgiving and harsh. it doesn't seem to want so 'smooth out' anything. I picked it because it seems to stay very live and detailed until low in the bass range. For most folks having a dropoff at 100hz is no problem but my voice still has stuff going on down there besides noise.

You might want to check out www.thelisteningsessions.com
 
I have the v67G and the v93M....love em' both and have had no problemos with them.....
 
I've got a V67 and 603s, like them both. I like the V67 on my voice, but it does have a sort of loose quality and seems to exagerate some sibilance (spelling?). I could definately use some lessons on placement though!

Slackmaster 2000
 
V67 Angles

I can get a variety of good vocal sounds out of the V67 by tilting the top the mic either toward or away from my face. Certain angles will definately tighten things up if you are getting a bit too warm and/or loose of a sound. Add the changes that you can get by going off axis side to side and there is a lot of room for experimentation.

I find that moving the V67 off to the side a bit is another trick that not only helps the plosives but also helps in dealing with sibilance.

I am still new at this but I am enjoying experimenting with the V67. Between the V67 and an SM57 I feel I have my vocal needs covered for the near future. At $83 including shipping on ebay, I feel that the V67 is a bargain.
 
Here's something all you Marshall MXLV67G users may want to try...... try singing towards the top of the diaphragm, then stright into the middle of the diaphragm, and then towards the bottom of the diaphragm.... and you will hear 3 different tones in these positions... find the one that works best for you and use that position (try off to the side some too). Also, play with the distance of your mouth from the diaphragm.... get in close for that "up front" sound or move back some if that fits in the mix better for you. Plus, try using different rooms in your home.... they'll all sound different. Spend some time with your mic(s) and get to know them and they will be your friends. :)
 
Last edited:
WoW!!!

I didn't expect so many replys that fast! Thanks a lot guys!!!!!



tomleblanc said:
What application are you looking into the LD condensers for?


I'll be using them on vocals. Right now I have AT3035 and I'm happy with it but just want variety of mics in my studio.

So I was checking AT4060 and Marshall tube mics and I'm not sure with wich one I'll be improving my vocal recording??
 
1006

I have the MXL 1006. In fact, it's the only condenser I have except these homebrew ECMs I built yesterday.
I like it a lot on baritone voices and love it on an accoustic guitar. I used it once on a drum set but since it's a crappy set in any case, I don't know how good the mics are. I used a pair of these as room mics to make a live recording of a concert and they worked really well. I tried one once on an upright piano and it performed really well.
I don't like it on guitar cabinets or female vocals. I stick to SM-57s and their clones for these purposes.

Oren
 
amala said:
WoW!!!

I didn't expect so many replys that fast! Thanks a lot guys!!!!!






I'll be using them on vocals. Right now I have AT3035 and I'm happy with it but just want variety of mics in my studio.

So I was checking AT4060 and Marshall tube mics and I'm not sure with wich one I'll be improving my vocal recording??


The 4060 has a bigger clearer sound than the V69 in general{YMMV}

Don
 
Back
Top