
knightfly
GrouchyOldFartOnBatteries
Hey Chewie - if inputting mics to the computer is ALL you really need to do, then an inexpensive stereo preamp such as the Audio buddy would be the least expensive.
However, if you want the most bang for the buck, then a small inexpensive (but decent quality) mixer makes the most sense. For a few hundred $, you get several channels of preamp, some more channels of line level input, an efx buss to hook up a reverb processor, a monitor buss to be able to monitor in real time so latency isn't a problem, a pair of volume controls for the monitor speakers, metering for all the above, a headphone amplifier of sorts, and probably a dozen other features I forgot to mention.
Granted the quality of preamps in such a board usually isn't quite as good as a standalone preamp, but just having EVERYTHING pretty much covered takes off a lot of pressure and lets you save for upgrades, like better preamps, mics, phones, monitors, etc, while still being able to record, mix, etc.... Steve
However, if you want the most bang for the buck, then a small inexpensive (but decent quality) mixer makes the most sense. For a few hundred $, you get several channels of preamp, some more channels of line level input, an efx buss to hook up a reverb processor, a monitor buss to be able to monitor in real time so latency isn't a problem, a pair of volume controls for the monitor speakers, metering for all the above, a headphone amplifier of sorts, and probably a dozen other features I forgot to mention.
Granted the quality of preamps in such a board usually isn't quite as good as a standalone preamp, but just having EVERYTHING pretty much covered takes off a lot of pressure and lets you save for upgrades, like better preamps, mics, phones, monitors, etc, while still being able to record, mix, etc.... Steve