A letter from Steve Albini

  • Thread starter Thread starter kEVINk
  • Start date Start date
K

kEVINk

New member
Thought some here might find this interesting. This is a copy of the letter my friend sent to Mr Albini, with his reply. For those of you not familiar with Steve's work, he has been guitarist/frontman for Big Black, Rapeman and Shellac; if you haven't heard them, you've heard someone imitating them. In addition, he has become a well recognized producer; I can't list everything he's worked on, but if you've bought any albums in the last ten years, odds are his name is on the back of some of them. His new studio, Electrical Audio Recording Studio, is in Chicago, which, as Steve mentions, features adobe construction.



At 03:28 AM 02/24/2001 -0800, you wrote:
> Steve, I know you are a busy guy so I’ll try to keep this short and to the point. I am from the Champaign Urbana area. Chambana has two recording facilities; Private and Pogo Studios. But $45 dollars an hour is not always an option for young musicians. I’ve been throwing myself into a meat grinder every day for the past couple of years, working hard to save money. My hands are solid tree bark. I have managed to save $20,000. My goal is to put that money into developing a studio.

Wow. That's 444 hours and 25 minutes at $45 an hour. That's 10 weeks in the studio. Are you sure you want to do this? I have been in three bands during the last 20 years, and all-tolled, I haven't spent that much time making records combined. It's hard to see how spending 20 grand on building a studio will be saving you any money.

I know something about the studios you mention, and while they aren't really up to the standards we set here at electrical, they are perfectly good small studios. Every college town in America has a couple of studios like this, and they are all about the same. Building something yourself that would serve as well will be a huge undertaking, and it will eat up every cent you make available to it.

>I am a solid musician with 15 years of experience. I have good ears, but have only been turning knobs and putting sound to tape for a couple years. This studio would be a cheap alternative for independent musicians. I will record bands for free or next to nothing, and they will give me the opportunity to acquire more knowledge in this field.

This is pretty much the route everybody takes to get experience.

>(My arsenal of tools to get this job done)
>1.One friend that is a licensed architect that has been studying studio design & acoustics. (I trust him; he is a musician and he introduced me to the COWS)

That's good news -- I sure don't trust the guy who introduced me to the Cows.

>2.One father that has any and all tools needed to fabricate a studio. He is also an electrician, and somehow always has a connection to find free and endless supplies of raw materials ( I think he may be in the mob)

You probably weren't supposed to tell me that.

>3. I do have a knack for carpentry and an extreme drive to make records, and to help out independent music.
>So anyway, my questions to you, Steve, are these; I’ve got a decent size basement and $20,000 dollar budget. How should Ii move my money around?

You will spend it all, without a doubt, but how you spend it depends on a number of circumstances. If you own the building, I suggest spending the lion's share of it on construction, and a minimal compliment of equipment, since you will naturally acquire more eqipment over time, but the construction, once finished, is hard to make changes to. If you don't own the building, then you should do as little construction as possible, since you can't take the construction with you if you get moved out by a rent increase, problems with neighbors, etc. In this case, you can buy a bigger compliment of equipment, but the acoustics (which are the most important part of any studio) may be compromised. Remember to make everything you build into the studio removable -- you will need to fix it eventually, and may need to move it someday.

>With this kind of budget, what is important, and what can I do without?

However much of your budget you spend on equipment, try to only buy equipment that has held its value or appreciated over time. It is better to buy a couple of $1000 mics that will still be worth $1000 in a year than five $400 mics that won't be worth half that in a year. It is better to buy an analog tape deck that has a known market value than a computer that Is only worth anything when brand new. I bought a $2800 computer a few years ago, a top-of-the-line 486 IBM. Right now it's worth about $200. I bought an Ampex ATR 102 for $1500 at the same time, and it's now worth $5000. I bought 4 top-of-the-line Sony DAT machines for $2000 apiece a few years ago, and they are worth about $400 now. At the same time, I bought a pair of AKG C-12 microphones for $8,000, and they are worth $12,000 now. Good equipment is expensive now, but if it is really good, it will hold its value or appreciate over time.

Don't buy any computer software -- it is like burning money. There is no resale value for any computer software, and the hardware interfaces become obsolete very quickly. If you have to do computer editing of sound files, use free software, demo versions, etc. The code is out there.

You will need to buy a shitload of wiring. The Gepco company in Chicago is probably the best cost/performance compromise -- nearly as easy to use as Mogami or Gotham, half the price.

Get more mic stands (especially short ones with little booms on them) than you think you need. You will always need at least two more than you have.

>Do you have any suggestions on equipment? Or who is a good company that i can rely on for finding good new or used equipment? I would especially be interested in your take on a good microphone? And, last but not least, were did you get adobe, or the equivalent to adobe, in the mid west?

Adobe comes from the Southwest, so that's where you have to get it. Like Lemurs in Madagascar, they ain't found anywhere else. We got ours from New Mexico.

Good microphones for the money: Royer R121, SF12, Audio Techinca 4033, 4050, 4051, Pro37R, Beyer M201, M88, M380, M500, M160, AKG D112, 451, Sennheiser 421, Electrovoice RE20 or PL20, Crown GLM100 (cool little mic I use all the time).

Tape machines are a whole ball of yarn. If you're willing to take the time to learn about them, fix them and maintain them, the best big old analog multitrack machines sound amazing, and you can buy them now at very reasonable prices. If you aren't willing to spend the time and energy to learn about them, then please don't buy one. They are great, and can give you spectacular results, but if they get mechanically or electronically out of line, and you don't fix problems as they arise, they can tear themselves apart like a thresher hitting a woodpile.

Best,
-steve albini
 
excellent man! that was a great lil letter. so whats ur friend gonna do? if he really wants to have a studio he can partner up with me it sounds like he wants to do it for the same reasons i do it. i recently upgraded my studio. i kinda started over i got everything i should've gotten in the first place. now all i gotta do is upgrade my website. u know ur name kinda reminds of cEvin Key, do u know of him?
later,
jal
 
Funny!!! (Don't trust him *grin*, he thinks his 486 IBM is worth $200!!).
Musicians / producers turned engineers have some really good ideas about gear.................
An old analogue machine is defiantely not cheap, maintaining them is a pain in the a$$, then can sound good ............ but eeehhhhhhhhh, wait a minute, what about this thing you need to go in and out of them, what's it called again? Oh yes, a console.
A good analogue setup is wonderful, very expensive, and very difficult to maintain, time consuming and restricted to 24 tracks - unless you want to get another 2" machine.
I've been in an amazing number of studios with such equipment over the years where the gear simply didn't work "all that well". So don't discount computers and / or digital recording, new digital technology sound as good as, if not better than, the majority of analogue systems (and I'm still looking for a good second hand Stevens 2"!).
For the rest, some good comments.
 
I agree sjoko. When I look backat the amount of time, energy and learning experience I spent looking after tape machines.... I threw out a 486 yesterday. ...I don't discount the computer alternative at all. I tell you what, 6 light ports is a damn site easier than 24 in 24 out balanced!!

I did like the way he spoke about acoustics and its importance in the recording process though :)

cheers
john
 
Bah! Nonsense..........

Acoustics and mics are over-rated anyways - all you need nowadays are a POD, Sampler and Protools, and maybe a Finalizer to smash it all together!!! :p

:D :D
 
Damn Blue Bear!!!! I've got pods, samplers and pro tools Does that mean I've spend the last 7 months building a studio and not earning anything but spending all my money ............ for nothing?????
If only I'd known that before I started!
 
Yup!

The money you saved could have got ya that Finalizer instead!!!

:D :D
 
Ahhhhhhhhh now I know where I went wrong!
I'm trying to finalize building a studio..........
I should have bought a finalizer instead
 
...'s anyone read...

albini's piece over at mercenary audio? man, i didn't know what to think about that one at first. he starts out slaughtering the record companies - which i don't mind at all - but then he goes on and on and just lets chainsaw loose on everything and when i finished it i just thought i'd stare at the tv the rest of the night. after half an hour i even turned it on...

http://www.mercenary.com/probwitmusby.html

micmac
 
Steve is definitely known as "opinionated", to put it lightly. Another friend of mine wrote him a two page letter fawning over how great he was and how much he liked shellac, blah blah blah. Steve wrote back (exact words) "Mark - you should work on your penmanship, you make a sloppy impression. Steve". Mark thought this was hysterical and pasted copies all over his house.

Steve is also known for his aversion to the digital medium (One of my Big Black albums reads "The future belongs to analog loyalists, f*ck digital"). While I take this with a grain of salt, from his end it makes a bit of sense. All of his bands have been three-piece (plus one, shudder, drum machine), "rawk" bands, no orchestra or choir overdubs; does he really need 48 tracks? If nothing else, his letter helped my friend to see that the heart and soul of his studio isn't going to reside in an O2R, but spread evenly amongst all of his equipment. So now he's looking at pre-amps and better mics. For that alone, this is worthwhile.

I would be curious if anyone with studio experience knows anything about the use of adobe in recording studios. Acording to Steve, Electrical is one of the first in the country to use it. He claims it's benefits include: mass, to stop sound transmission; pourous, uneven surface for diffusion and absorbtion. Any thoughts?

To jal, I have to admit cEvin was a bit (okay, a lot) of an influence in my name; listened to Skinney Puppy quite a bit, only saw them once. I saw Ogre with Pigface after he straightened himself out. I have to plead ignorance, though, was it cEvin or Dwayne that ODed? I found it, well, ironic that they spent so much time being frustrated with Ogre for his addiction, how much time and talent they were wasting, then Ogre gets himself straight, then one of them proceeds to overdose. Tragic.

I suppose the other half of my name comes from the protagonist from some of Kafka's work, known only as "k". It's also the first letter of my middle name. whew, that's putting it all out, isn't it?
 
Forget about the probably bit ........ I might not like his opinions on equipment, but here he's spot-on.
Our new production company (in which we've put all our money!!) is called NGS Productions LLC, NGS stands for Nobody Gets Screwed - and now you know why.

A&R people - wannabe musicians without the talent to "make it" - result - jealousy for the people they supposedly etc....

Record companies are a business, they have to earn money., so they have to work according to commercial principles. Unfortunately, they have found that they can be more successful by manipulation and scheming than in an ideal world, where they would excist to guide and support artists.

A very good thing is that the record industry, like most other industries, has been proven to go through cycles. Over the last year we have seen the amalgamation of record companies into what is now called the "Big 5". The top of a cycle. Over the next years we'll see a return of independents, which is a good thing, clearing the way for innovation and some level of "the right principles".

I can give you numerous examples of rotten stuff in the music bizz, enough to write a book. It IS, without question, the hardest, most difficult business to be involved in. Artists, by nature, are not business people. Therefore they are on-the-whole, a group of people easily manipulated and taken advantage off.
I'll stick to a couple of examples:
An artist who is, without question, one of the most talented singers / writers. He was in a top band with major International success. Doen't drink, doesn't smoke, doesn't do drugs, workaholic. The rest of the band did all that, to extremes. He left, the band carried on, but never achieved nearly the same success again.
To his surprise, he didn't get a record deal. Somehow things always seemed to fall through at the last minute.
So, we set out to record at our own expense. We selected a bunch of his songs, collaborated with some of the world's top players. We finished when we had enough songs on tape to release at least 2, perhaps 3 CD's (thinking that, if this stuff hits - he won't have time to get back into the studio soon!). Two more offers, which both fell through, no reasons given. Very strange! I decided it was time to call in some favors and contacted the Snr. VP of one of the "big 5". I had given him a number of projects going back 25 plus years, the success of a couple of those was the reason why he was "earning the big bucks" anyway - in other words, he owed me big time.
He heard the tapes - I got a fax back saying "Yes! Brilliant!! We want it!". Negotiations with one of their labels, discussions with marketing people, lawyers etc. negotiated a contract (a very good one - it was worth it!). Suddenly I got a one paragraph letter: "Sorry but no, we don't think it is what we want" Considering the enthousiasm within the label, this was amazing. My phone calls went unanswered .... total silence. Even our lawyer got no response.
What happened? It took me a lot of time to find out. Major deals have to be signed of by the labels' top brass, and then by the top guy in charge of the company. In this case the person was / is a personal friend of some of the band members of the artists previous band. He hated him for leaving the band and vowed to make sure he wasn't going to succeed in anything. Rumours were spread about the artist being gay (definately not true!) and him being impossible to work with (also bullshit!). The contract landed on his desk - he never listened to the music, saw the name on the paper and apparently said "never!", tore the contract up, leaving everyone involved with egg on their faces and us well out of pocket (we spend 7 months recording, paid musicians, and had to spend on lawyers fees, travel etc.).
Now .... a record company is a business, its executives responsible to shareholders. In any other industry, if a CEO, president or other person in a senior position would be seen to make commercial decisions based on personal likes and dislikes, decissions which could have a negative influence on commercial success, they would be held accountable. Not here! Hey! this is after all .... the music business!!With the amalgamation of all the labels into the Big 5, virtually all executives have "been around". Everybody knows everybody. If we'd present his work to yet another label, someone will say "oh, I heard this guy's impossible! he's got a real bad repOf cause we did get other offers. As they know the artist's situation, the vulgers came out. "We'll take you on, we love your music!" - but only at a minimal amount of royalties and by the way, we need you to give us 50% of you publishing. Not just on your new material, also on your old stuff". This is what the artist lives on, giving 1/2 of it away would endanger his survival. Any company could sign him up, do nothing and just cash in on publishing rights.
Now he's at home, just writing songs, not earning money, getting depressed.

In the famous words of Hunter Thomson: "The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side."

Why am I in music again? Oh yes, I just love music.
 
*grin* I said a couple of examples - but that was only one. Don't make me carry on! Like I said, after 30 years - I could write a book on "foul play"
 
kEVINk said:
All of his bands have been three-piece (plus one, shudder, drum machine), "rawk" bands, no orchestra or choir overdubs; does he really need 48 tracks?

Ever hear of Neurosis? Layers upon layers of standard band instrumentation, samples, cello, violin, three vocalists, two drummers.
 
Trying to think of some way said band's name could be revealed in a manner that would not set anyone up for slander......


Anagrams, anyone? Naval Hen? Ty-sx? Kid Pon Fly? Spam Past Death Amen Ha!?

Okay, I'm lousy at anagrams, and band histories....

Now for spoonerisms...........
 
Enemy of the Sun,

Damn! I knew your name was familiar. Ya, I was a big Neurosis fan back in the day, though I must admit I haven't heard anything past "Through Silver In Blood".

Even have Pain of Mind on vinyl (back when they actually liked Maximum Rock n Roll). And of course my Day of the Lords 7". Youch, showing my age.

Ever see them live? I think I went outside and threw up at one of their shows from "overstimulation". Definitely go to a Neurosis show on an empty stomach.


But yes, you have a point. Not to say that anything typically "rock" can't venture outside of those limitations, only that Steve's work, band-wise, has not. Point well taken.
 
Kevink

Thats cool didnt expect anyone here to know what was going on there. Anyhow Albini is their producer of choice for some time now.

Yes the live show is without equal. They are mature musicians at this point that are in a odd class of their own. Best described I would say as half "god speed you black emperor" like, slow ambient mellow stuff with a dynamic droning metal sound in some parts. The live imagery is pretty amazing
 
Private Studios

Just thought I'd comment on Private Studios in Urbana. I recorded there a couple years ago in their "B" studio (24 track ADAT). We did 6 songs in 9 hours, mix down, horn, keyboard and vocal overdubs...everything. That guy (can't remember his name!) made my shoddy college band sound better than I could have dreamed for $30/hour! Seemed like a pretty good deal to me......
 
Back
Top