70s Twin Reverb Silverface Restoration Help

_brian_

_brian_

Member
Hi all,

I'm trying to restore my twin reverb back to health, I love the amplifier but I've never gotten round to giving it the TLC it deserves. However, there seems to be a discrepancy in capacitor sizes and online schematics and I'm not sure how to continue.

This amp was gifted to me by my uncle a long long time ago, he purchased it from a shop for £50! The low price was due to it not working but all it needed was a new tube, he then gigged with it constantly and when he retired around 15 years ago gave it to me.

It goes without saying that I don't want to change anything to the detriment of the amplifier's sound, but I have noticed it does need some work.

One of the electrolytic capacitors has a large leak, another has the beginnings of a leak, and there seems to be a non-original capacitor soldered in there which I don't know the value of because the text has rubbed off of it.

The capacitors are as follows;

220 MF, 285VDC
220 MF, 285VDC
20 MF, 500VDC
20 MF, 500VDC
20 MF, 500VDC
70 MF, 70VDC
>Unknown Capacitor<

Apart from the unknown capacitor, the rest look to be original Mallory's. I'm an engineer, and have some electronic understanding but not a lot regarding audio equipment. I tend to like to write music more than fixing the things that make it! However this amp was a present and I want to be careful with it.

Can anyone advise me of what the likely value is for this unknown capacitor and perhaps advise me on which electrolytic caps to replace them with?

Would it be best just to replace all the capacitors or just the ones that test or look bad?

Many thanks for your help.
 
Hi,
There are arguments both ways. Some say don't replace anything you don't need to replace and others say if one or two caps are known to be bad then replace all caps of that brand and type while you're in there.
I tend to go with the second approach.

For the unknown capacitor, when you say non original do you mean replaced at some point or not part of the schematic?
If it's been replaced you should be able to figure out where it is on the schemo and get the value from there.
If it's a modification added by someone then it would be good to try to work out where that is in the circuit and add it to your schematic, so you can show us.
If it's function is obvious it may be easy for someone to recommend values for it.
 
IMG_20231110_105117595vs.jpg

Steenamaroo said:
Hi,
There are arguments both ways. Some say don't replace anything you don't need to replace and others say if one or two caps are known to be bad then replace all caps of that brand and type while you're in there.
I tend to go with the second approach.

For the unknown capacitor, when you say non original do you mean replaced at some point or not part of the schematic?
If it's been replaced you should be able to figure out where it is on the schemo and get the value from there.
If it's a modification added by someone then it would be good to try to work out where that is in the circuit and add it to your schematic, so you can show us.
If it's function is obvious it may be easy for someone to recommend values for it.
Click to expand...

Thanks for replying, the only problem is I don't see any schematic which uses the same capacitor values which are installed so I can't use that as a guide. You can see the other capacitor in the picture, it looks like there's supposed to be one there because there's space for it but it's different from the rest so I assumed it's not original and has been replaced at some point.
 
"There are arguments both ways."
I kind of acquaint it with auto mechanics. "you have to take the hub off to change the rotors", "yes", "okay, while your in there replace the wheel bearings."
"My water pump is bad"? "Yes". "Okay, while you're in there put a new timing belt on."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top