$200k direct payment to Joe Biden

60's guy said:
CNN is what it is. Fox is what it is. Every network is what they are. At best, all networks are unreliable and biased one way or another. It's quite frightening that it's the media outlet moguls who have more control of not only the U.S. but also other countries politicians. Newspaper editors are worse yet!
Click to expand...
Edit
 
60's guy said:
CNN is what it is. Fox is what it is. Every network is what they are. At best, all networks are unreliable and biased one way or another. It's quite frightening that it's the media outlet moguls who have more control of not only the U.S. but also other countries politicians. Newspaper editors are worse yet@
Click to expand...
It is our responsibility to exercise critical thinking when watching/reading everything these days.
 
brassplyer said:
No one is going to think less of you for admitting that your original comment about Rumble creating content was in error.
Click to expand...
That's inaccurate, but OK. They are like most/many/all sites. They want clicks/eyeballs and those that are like minded are the prey.
Critical thinking is what we all need to employ.
 
brassplyer said:
No one is going to think less of you for admitting that your original comment about Rumble creating content was in error.
Click to expand...
Dave Matthews said:
That's inaccurate, but OK.
Click to expand...
What's inaccurate?

Dave Matthews said:
They are like most/many/all sites. They want clicks/eyeballs and those that are like minded are the prey.
Critical thinking is what we all need to employ.
Click to expand...
Like-minded to whom? There's guidelines of course but no prohibition against any political orientation on Rumble.

Here's their terms of use - the word "political" appears nowhere.

Website Terms and Conditions of Use and Agency Agreement

rumble.com rumble.com
 
PorterhouseMusic said:
Side note regarding Wikipedia - which I have donated to since it's beginning....

It is an excellent open source information resource that takes the responsibility of being reliable very seriously. If you've ever tried to contribute to or edit a subject entry there - you'll find that there is a system in place which facilitates the end goal of reliability. Nothing is perfect and nothing ever will be. But it is neither true or accurate to claim that Wikipedia is an unreliable source. It is, in fact, an incredibly reliable source. This is not an opinion. It is verifiably true. Not to mention that much of the subject matter there is not the kind of thing that you have an "opinion" about. For instance - the entry on the subject "Algebra". Like a lot of subjects - there's not much room for opinion about algebra.

From Wiki:
Click to expand...
Wikipedia is by no means reliable. Many schools and universities won’t allow you to cite them as a source. 77% of the articles there are written by 1% of their editors. Like every other information outlet on the planet, a select few control what the public sees. Your donations are much like supporting leftist policies. NO REFUNDS!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top