$200k direct payment to Joe Biden

That's interesting. Not really though.

I've been in Tucson and San Tan Valley for the last week or so. I read the New York Times, Reuters, and NPR every day and didn't see anything about this. But I did see Chris Botti and his incredible band at the Fox Theatre on Thursday night. Our 3rd time seeing him. It was an outstanding show. That kat continues to surround himself with world class players. It was a killer performance. Highly recommended :thumbs up:
 
PorterhouseMusic said:
That's interesting. Not really though.
Click to expand...
Some have a strong devotion to pretending Joedaughtershowers isn't corrupt.

PorterhouseMusic said:
I've been in Tucson and San Tan Valley for the last week or so. I read the New York Times, Reuters, and NPR every day and didn't see anything about this.
Click to expand...
Okay well...that settles the matter, nothing to see here.

:ROFLMAO:

PorterhouseMusic said:
But I did see Chris Botti and his incredible band at the Fox Theatre on Thursday night. Our 3rd time seeing him. It was an outstanding show. That kat continues to surround himself with world class players. It was a killer performance. Highly recommended :thumbs up:
Click to expand...
He's got a nice sound, always has a great group from examples I've heard.
 
brassplyer said:
Joedaughtershowers got some 'splainin to do.


rumble.com

House Oversight Chair James Comer: We Have Evidence of a $200,000 'Direct Payment' to Joe Biden

*** The Liberty Daily benefits when you shop using the following links and Code: TLD _ The Liberty Daily Recommends ONE Honest, America-First Precious Metals Company - Our Gold Guy! https://ourgoldguy
rumble.com rumble.com
Click to expand...
You laugh at Wikipedia, but trust Rumble? Hmmm...

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Rumble - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no
mediabiasfactcheck.com mediabiasfactcheck.com
 
I'm not claiming Joe Biden is not corrupt. I am claiming - because it's 100% true - that there is no evidence of corruption. James Comer has said lots of stuff - and has produced nothing. Just like with election fraud - the type and scale that would change the outcome of the last election - you've got nothing but accusations. And hope. That's not good enough for me.

This too.... is looking like another nothing-burger. When damning evidence is brought out in the light of day - you won't find me defending Joe Biden.

www.yahoo.com

Another GOP ‘Bombshell’ About Joe Biden Turns Out To Be A Dud

Republicans’ impeachment inquiry continues to limp along in the background of their speaker drama.
www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com

www.newsweek.com

GOP raising alarm over Joe Biden getting $200K loan repayment spurs mockery

"Jamie Comer is pretty desperate to try to distract from Republicans' speaker mess," wrote Ian Sams, White House spokesman for oversight and investigations.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com
 
Last edited:
Dave Matthews said:
You laugh at Wikipedia, but trust Rumble? Hmmm...
Click to expand...

Rumble like Youtube, Bitchute , etc is just a platform. They don’t create the content, they just host it.
You could get on Rumble and start a ‘Dave’s music’ channel. Would it all of a sudden be deemed crap because it’s on Rumble?

More platforms for putting out info is a good thing, not a bad thing. Some censor more, some less.

Its up to the end user to determine and make up their own minds as to what is bullshit and what’s valid info.
 
Side note regarding Wikipedia - which I have donated to since it's beginning....

It is an excellent open source information resource that takes the responsibility of being reliable very seriously. If you've ever tried to contribute to or edit a subject entry there - you'll find that there is a system in place which facilitates the end goal of reliability. Nothing is perfect and nothing ever will be. But it is neither true or accurate to claim that Wikipedia is an unreliable source. It is, in fact, an incredibly reliable source. This is not an opinion. It is verifiably true. Not to mention that much of the subject matter there is not the kind of thing that you have an "opinion" about. For instance - the entry on the subject "Algebra". Like a lot of subjects - there's not much room for opinion about algebra.

From Wiki:

It is hard to know what to trust online these days. Disinformation and scammers are everywhere. Wikipedia is different: not perfect, but also not here to make a profit or to push a particular perspective. It is written by everyone, together. Wikipedia is something we all share, like a library or a public park. We are passionate about our model because we want everyone to have equal access to high-quality information – something that is becoming harder and harder to find online.
Click to expand...
 
RFR said:
Rumble like Youtube, Bitchute , etc is just a platform. They don’t create the content, they just host it.
You could get on Rumble and start a ‘Dave’s music’ channel. Would it all of a sudden be deemed crap because it’s on Rumble?

More platforms for putting out info is a good thing, not a bad thing. Some censor more, some less.

Its up to the end user to determine and make up their own minds as to what is bullshit and what’s valid info.
Click to expand...
You are missing the fact that Rumble DOES create bullshit content. That is exactly why they are rated so poorly.
 
Dave Matthews said:
You are missing the fact that Rumble DOES create bullshit content. That is exactly why they are rated so poorly.
Click to expand...
What content is that? What channels?

And even if what you’re saying is true, that doesn’t mean there aren’t truthful content creators on the platform or any of the other media platforms.
 
Last edited:
PorterhouseMusic said:
I'm not claiming Joe Biden is not corrupt. I am claiming - because it's 100% true - that there is no evidence of corruption. James Comer has said lots of stuff - and has produced nothing. Just like with election fraud - the type and scale that would change the outcome of the last election - you've got nothing but accusations. And hope. That's not good enough for me.

This too.... is looking like another nothing-burger. When damning evidence is brought out in the light of day - you won't find me defending Joe Biden.
Click to expand...
Preach brother.
 
brassplyer said:
Joedaughtershowers got some 'splainin to do.
Click to expand...
Dave Matthews said:
You laugh at Wikipedia, but trust Rumble? Hmmm...

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Rumble - Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no
mediabiasfactcheck.com mediabiasfactcheck.com
Click to expand...
There's a significant difference between Rumble and Wikipedia. A Rumble video is by one particular content uploader and in this case is a statement by a particular individual James Comer. The big difference between Rumble and YouTube is Rumble doesn't actively censor voices from a particular side the way YouTube does. Is Comer telling it straight? Decide for yourself.

A Wikipedia article typically has input from numerous, mostly anonymous editors. Even gotten involved with a Wikipedia article? Arbitration and other committees, moderators and on and on - the layers are endless. "Policy" means whatever some cabal decides it means and isn't at all consistently applied from one article to another. A "reliable source" is whatever a particular cabal says it is. The content is subject to the bias of whoever has the time to devote to it and there's a definite leftist bias, that's just fact.

Wikipedia has an odd credo - "Verifiability, not truth". Some bullshit article in a leftist rag that's deemed a "reliable source" says something, that's a good citation by Wiki standards. Use a citation from a source the leftists don't like they'll go to obsessive lengths to get it excluded.

From one of the founders of Wikipedia.

nypost.com

Wikipedia co-founder says site is now ‘propaganda’ for left-leaning ‘establishment’

Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger has warned that the website can no longer be trusted — insisting it is now just “propaganda” for the left-leaning “establishment.”
nypost.com nypost.com
 
Last edited:
PorterhouseMusic said:
Side note regarding Wikipedia - which I have donated to since it's beginning....

It is an excellent open source information resource that takes the responsibility of being reliable very seriously.
Click to expand...
Funny then that universities don't accept it as a source for research papers.

Some try to add reliable information, many are devoted to only allowing leftist bias. At best it's a place to start but nothing more.

A (believed former) Wikipedia moderator whose identity I became aware of is a convicted child molester - did time for it. When he was active as a moderator he pissed off a lot of people - absolute horse's ass.
 
Dave Matthews said:
You are missing the fact that Rumble DOES create bullshit content. That is exactly why they are rated so poorly.
Click to expand...
Show an example of content specifically created by the company that runs Rumble.

Leftists hate Rumble because it doesn't censor conservative voices the way YouTube does and Twitter used to do.
 
brassplyer said:
Show an example of content specifically created by the company that runs Rumble.

Leftists hate Rumble because it doesn't censor conservative voices the way YouTube does and Twitter used to do.
Click to expand...
Sites like Rumble don't need to create original content. They are tickled pink to post bullshit for the clicks = money.
Anyway... where's the indictment?
 
brassplyer said:
Show an example of content specifically created by the company that runs Rumble.

Leftists hate Rumble because it doesn't censor conservative voices the way YouTube does and Twitter used to do.
Click to expand...
Dave Matthews said:
Sites like Rumble don't need to create original content.
Click to expand...
So you can't back this up:

You are missing the fact that Rumble DOES create bullshit content.
Click to expand...
They host a variety of content, not all of it political, they don't create any.

Haven't you claimed to be a conservative? Why would you object to a site allowing a wide range of voices?

Dave Matthews said:
They are tickled pink to post bullshit for the clicks = money.
Click to expand...
I'm not versed as to what Rumble's income flow model is but other than volunteer efforts do you work for free?
 
brassplyer said:
So you can't back this up:


They host a variety of content, not all of it political, they don't create any.

Haven't you claimed to be a conservative? Why would you object to a site allowing a wide range of voices?


I'm not versed as to what Rumble's income flow model is but other than volunteer efforts do you work for free?
Click to expand...
finty.com

How Rumble Makes Money: A Look Inside Their Business Model

A detailed look into how Rumble makes money. Learn how the free speach-loving YouTube alternative generates revenue.
finty.com finty.com
 
Dave Matthews said:
Are they worse than Fox news?
Welcome back BTW.
Click to expand...
CNN is what it is. Fox is what it is. Every network is what they are. At best, all networks are unreliable and biased one way or another. It's quite frightening that it's the media outlet moguls who have more control of not only the U.S. but also other countries politicians. Newspaper editors are worse yet@
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top