"Mystical" - New Minimal Tribal Techno

  • Thread starter Thread starter OSHC
  • Start date Start date
First comment.... thanks for not subjecting me to a 120BPM thump!!!! I actually listened to the entire track instead of the first 10 seconds.

I guess techo is just one of those genres that doesn't excite me on it's own, but as I was listening to it, I was thinking "this would be a really cool instrumental section of a bigger work", like after a couple of verses, a short guitar solo, then here comes some really cool keyboard antics just before the band makes a big return. Maybe it's from my days of listening to Yes or ELP, etc. where you had 10 or 15 minute songs with different sections that combined to make a complete composition.
 
First comment.... thanks for not subjecting me to a 120BPM thump!!!! I actually listened to the entire track instead of the first 10 seconds.

I guess techo is just one of those genres that doesn't excite me on it's own, but as I was listening to it, I was thinking "this would be a really cool instrumental section of a bigger work", like after a couple of verses, a short guitar solo, then here comes some really cool keyboard antics just before the band makes a big return. Maybe it's from my days of listening to Yes or ELP, etc. where you had 10 or 15 minute songs with different sections that combined to make a complete composition.
Thank you so much for taking the time to listen to the entire track. I really appreciate it. Yes, in this particular track I wanted to try something different and not make the kick the main focus for a change :) I can totally relate with you about a track like this being a section of a bigger composition. I was just now imagining something like that where an orchestra started playing drums as a build up from the break in this track or a similar track. At the same time, it is also entirely possible that I still need to develop the skill to create a complete composition - like a story with lots of twists and turns.

I really appreciate your encouragement. Really glad that you could hear some improvements in my track. Thank you once again!
 
Things in general sound OK.

The music, to me, didn't move enough to keep interest up. With no vocal, something needs to attract listener interest. That little 4-bar riff on the bass goes on throughout the song and never changes up.

Maybe add different instruments. Have something provide a counter melody. Add a bridge. That kind of thing.
 
Things in general sound OK.

The music, to me, didn't move enough to keep interest up. With no vocal, something needs to attract listener interest. That little 4-bar riff on the bass goes on throughout the song and never changes up.

Maybe add different instruments. Have something provide a counter melody. Add a bridge. That kind of thing.
Thank you so much for taking the time to listen to the track. I agree with you about the dynamics of the track. Thanks for pointing that out!
 
While this isn't a genre I produce, I do listen to a lot of stuff like this. I listened to this track and several of your others on YouTube. I think you have some interesting ideas (like your genre crossovers) and some mostly solid arrangements. I think there are a few things you can do to make your stuff sound more like it belongs in a minimal techno playlist like this one:
  • More bass. In all your tracks I heard, the kick drum is the only element that has any sub-100hz bass energy (and even some of the kicks are on the weak side). Compare any of your tracks to the ones from that playlist above; by and large they have much more activity in the low end of the spectrum.
  • More air and space. Your arrangements and production are very tight, but they feel a little claustrophobic. Most of the pro stuff feels bigger due a lot of reverb and delay, but also it feels more vibrant due to the high-frequency content in the mix. I'm not talking about transients so much as harmonics (saturation/distortion).
  • More automation. When working in genres that involve minimalist compositions where the melodies and riffs are so sparse and repetitive, you have to work a lot harder to keep the listener's interest. In the track above you do some automation on a mid-range pulse synth, but your bass is pretty static. You could improve things a bit by using a bass patch with a lot of mid/high harmonics and doing some resonant filter sweeps on it throughout the track.
(I am also an electronic producer- mostly synthwave/synthpop- and I have a personal goal of making it into some of the curated playlists. And these are the kinds of things I think about with my own work, as well.)
 
While this isn't a genre I produce, I do listen to a lot of stuff like this. I listened to this track and several of your others on YouTube. I think you have some interesting ideas (like your genre crossovers) and some mostly solid arrangements. I think there are a few things you can do to make your stuff sound more like it belongs in a minimal techno playlist like this one:
  • More bass. In all your tracks I heard, the kick drum is the only element that has any sub-100hz bass energy (and even some of the kicks are on the weak side). Compare any of your tracks to the ones from that playlist above; by and large they have much more activity in the low end of the spectrum.
  • More air and space. Your arrangements and production are very tight, but they feel a little claustrophobic. Most of the pro stuff feels bigger due a lot of reverb and delay, but also it feels more vibrant due to the high-frequency content in the mix. I'm not talking about transients so much as harmonics (saturation/distortion).
  • More automation. When working in genres that involve minimalist compositions where the melodies and riffs are so sparse and repetitive, you have to work a lot harder to keep the listener's interest. In the track above you do some automation on a mid-range pulse synth, but your bass is pretty static. You could improve things a bit by using a bass patch with a lot of mid/high harmonics and doing some resonant filter sweeps on it throughout the track.
(I am also an electronic producer- mostly synthwave/synthpop- and I have a personal goal of making it into some of the curated playlists. And these are the kinds of things I think about with my own work, as well.)

Thanks so much for taking the time to listen to my tracks and for your very kind detailed feedback/suggestions above. It really helps me out by giving me some things to keep in the back of my mind while I sit down to produce my next track!! BTW, I really enjoyed listening to your cover of "Reflections" on Soundcloud. Loved the flow and the overall sound of the track!!
 
Things in general sound OK.

The music, to me, didn't move enough to keep interest up. With no vocal, something needs to attract listener interest. That little 4-bar riff on the bass goes on throughout the song and never changes up.

Maybe add different instruments. Have something provide a counter melody. Add a bridge. That kind of thing.
As per usual, often I just go "What Trip said".

I always find my first impression of such is "cool sound!" - which if it doesn't "do something else" wears quickly on me. That's the trick of this genre. I don't go to dance clubs to listen to music for the same reason. So what might work in that environment thins a bit when all one is doing is listening. But - that's why such comments need to be taken with a grain of perspective. This stuff is not meant for listening entertainment like, say, a folk song. So contextually, it may be fine as is. But it is a duck out of water in a critical listening situation. It's meant more as background than extended close listening.
 
This stuff is not meant for listening entertainment like, say, a folk song. So contextually, it may be fine as is.
I think that's true. Many people like to have music playing in the background while they go on about their life - listening passively. And this piece is probably fine for that purpose.
 
As per usual, often I just go "What Trip said".

I always find my first impression of such is "cool sound!" - which if it doesn't "do something else" wears quickly on me. That's the trick of this genre. I don't go to dance clubs to listen to music for the same reason. So what might work in that environment thins a bit when all one is doing is listening. But - that's why such comments need to be taken with a grain of perspective. This stuff is not meant for listening entertainment like, say, a folk song. So contextually, it may be fine as is. But it is a duck out of water in a critical listening situation. It's meant more as background than extended close listening.
Thanks so much for your insightful comment. I totally agree with you about most music in this genre being more like background music!
 
Back
Top