kcearl
I see deaf people
You are better educated on how to get banned?
Im not sure...only time will tell
You are better educated on how to get banned?
At least you're not paying off any student loans in Trollology.Im not sure...only time will tell
It's way fuzzier than that. The problem has already been broached by those hedging the operant phrase as the "known universe" as opposed to the Universe.
Yup!But, the balloon analogy shows why trying to locate an actual center (i.e. "Where the Big Bang expansion happened") is a{n even more} poorly formulated question.
Except they are saying.. We can see to the outer edge, and earliest time of that big bang.That's the rub. The observable universe ain't the whole thing. You are always at the center of your own observable space no matter where you are. Unless the universe isn't homogenous and isotropic. There really isn't anything remarkable about being at the center of your own horizons. ..
So that's sort of the link between, our universe, and time I guess? Also the boundary of space itself?Time cant exist without the presence of evidence of at least some substance in motion, or the result of the effect of substance moving in relation to another substance or the result of the effect of substance. No change on any level, no time. No change, no time. Time can still pass for the observer but not at the location with no change.
Except they are saying.. We can see to the outer edge, and earliest time of that big bang.
Now that idea, seem fairly straight forward.
But they're also saying that there is no other 'part of the universe' nor even time beyond (or 'prior' to) that!
The second link I posted FWIW..