
miroslav
Cosmic Cowboy
Right... 

Different things...one is about quality of tone...the other is about getting it without rules (but it still has to be quality).
The fact that real tube amps sound great and pods suck ass and DO NOT sound like real amps...is NOT a rule...it's a fact.
I was open-minded many times and tried many a pod/sim…and NOPE…they can’t hide their digital pedigree.
Maybe you just don’t hear it.
He does...it's me/you...the player.![]()
Unfortunately, that is such a minor factor that for any given band it is totally meaningless what their individual gear selection is.
You, on the other hand, seem to suggest that you could rank the bands mainly by their gear (you did state that was the first thing you notice), so the band with the Mesas that sounded like mud and the chick singer who couldn't carry a tune in a bucket (hot though, I love her) should have won. Hmmm.
Meaningless to whom...the audience or the players?
I'm talking about the player's perspective about his gear...but there will also be a few people in the audience who are listening/looking beyond the band's "party" effect...and actually picking up on the finer nuances of the playing AND of the tone/gear guality.
Why "look"? You keep saying that. The only reason to "look" is to prejudge the band based upon your feelings about the quality of their gear. Can you truly enjoy a band that uses all solid state gear? Be honest, can you? Or are you thinking in the back of your mind, "Gee, they would be better with a tube amp"?
Read this article and meditate on it:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/04/AR2007040401721.html
hey miro, where are you seeing this constant inflow of new club bands?
What is it that you really want to ask/say:
Instead of fishing...just ask/say it.![]()
i'm not fishing for anything. around here, the bands that play out are the same group of people i've know and played with for....
A violin player and a club band are two different animals.
And I don't "prejudge" on visuals...but there is NO way to NOT also judge a band visually...unless you happen to be blind.
My main point was about using gear that makes you play, feel and sound better...VS...using gear that just gets the job done.
If you don't see any difference between the two...then there's no point in going further with the discussion.
No, your main point is about using gear that makes YOU feel better, and trying to enforce that preference on everyone else. Tube amps don't make me feel or play better, they just make the notes I am playing sound slightly different.
...I've said it at least a few times...it makes ME feel better, and I think pods sucks, and I prefer real tube amps.
Even if you do raw Punk...there is a look that works and one that doesn't..
you've said it way more than a few times.
really? which one of these is real raw punk rock?![]()
Why don't you tell me...you picked them all out.
nah, you're the expert.
I think what we need is a studio modelling box, stick any old $10 mic in front of any old $10 instrument, select studio: Abbey Road, Sun Studios, etc etc. Out pops the sound of the studio.
In fact we could take it further, dial up the engineer you want it to sound like, the producer, the musician, than any old talentless anyone can sound like:
Eric Clapton, on a classic Les Paul, through a vintage fender twin.
Recorded at Abbey Road with a C12 microphone.
Engineered by Alan Parsons and produced by George Martin.
Perfect world.
Alan
I don't much care what other people use.![]()
Sure...I could listen to [a shitty looking band]...but the *overall* impact would still be that their stage presence was shitty and that they should work on it
They will start the revolution this July...
Maybe you're on to something there.Notice how they ALL have a similar look...