cyan...I think you have a good idea going... some kind of format might work out, especially after a few get the hang of it....others might follow along.
One thing that kinda gripes me about this clinic is everyone kinda seems to *gush* over peoples stuff, and it seems like there IS a hesitancy to be honest. Many, many people just post..."sounds good, killer mix".....end of statement.
Also, I think there are a couple of levels of competency going on here looking for reviews. Those that are in the mixing stages...looking for assistance/advice....those that are just new to recording...and finally a group of people whos stuff is really good and have a finished product. Personally, I like listening to finished products more, rather than "works in progress" and admit that I am swayed away when the poster states "this mix is in progress, I am going to redo the drums, the vocals suck, and I am going to add another guitar, etc, etc...." Also, I like reviewing/listening to polished mixes the most, and actually think they should be compared/reviewed in comparison with current artists who are making a sucessful living out of it...ala...selling it and getting good airplay.
And...last but not least...I am one of the many that still has a 56k modem hookup VS highspeed, so downloading 5mg files kinda sucks. Therefore, (yeah I know the quality aint there), a lo-fi option makes reviewing more attractive to me...such as like places at MP3.com and IUMA, etc. I listen to the lo-fi first, and if I think the MP3 needs better scrutiny, I'll download it. Those are the files I look for first, and people with just links to download a 4+mg file, I do last.
Just a couple random thoughts I had....btw, I have been part of several internet review groups, and this is by far the most active I have seen. Some don't even comment after sending CD's around, so I kinda dropped doing that stuff, as I was just mailing CD's off into the wind. Maybe a compilation CD every now and then might be a ticket too....just some ideas...