Well i definetly wouldn't use the 58 either one for recording. It's more designed for live stage use. You'd be better off going for the 57 which are only like $90 for pry the most verstile mic on the market.
PG = the Pro Gear range. Rather like the Squire range of Fender. Similar components, same look, essentially the same specs BUT NOT THE SAME.
Then again I don't like Shure mics either.
Well i definetly wouldn't use the 58 either one for recording. It's more designed for live stage use. You'd be better off going for the 57 which are only like $90 for pry the most verstile mic on the market.
I'm not sure how you get from PG58 territory to "Nice Ribbon" territory so easily. "Don't waste your time with that bicycle, buy yourself a nice helicopter."
For live sound use, the PG mics are not entirely useless, but you would be well served to save up for a regular 58. And yes, I've used both in live settings and I know the difference.
The windscreen has a significant effect on the sound. The 57 also has a more usable HF response, both in terms of having less deep frequency cuts and in terms of rolling off a little higher, I think.
metalhead28 said:
I'm not sure how you get from PG58 territory to "Nice Ribbon" territory so easily. "Don't waste your time with that bicycle, buy yourself a nice helicopter."
Depends on the definition of nice. I've seen fairly nice ribbons used for $500-ish, which, price-wise, is more like the difference between an 8-year-old used car and a new one.
For that matter, even the cheapest ribbons coming out these days sound a million times better than a PG58, IMHO, and you're only talking about a factor of two price difference. Chump change in the grand scheme of things.
Of course, I'm assuming that this is intended for recording use, not stage use.