What is a tube?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jerberson12
  • Start date Start date
If you don't know Ohm's Law, you definitely aren't an audio engineer. A sound technician, perhaps, but not an engineer. I don't even call myself an engineer; I reserve that term for people that either have an EE or who actually know what they are doing. Sometimes that is the same person.
 
If you don't know Ohm's Law, you definitely aren't an audio engineer. A sound technician, perhaps, but not an engineer. I don't even call myself an engineer; I reserve that term for people that either have an EE or who actually know what they are doing. Sometimes that is the same person.

We don't write the laws, we just enforce them.. oh.. wait... that was a traffic ticket... regardless, I hope 'technician' implies some experience with voltage, current and resistance beyond sticking the paperclip in the outlet:eek:

After reading a bunch of your posts, MsHilarious, it seems the EE is already in your head, so I think it can come on out now:)
 
Last edited:
We don't write the laws, we just enforce them.. oh.. wait... that was a traffic ticket... regardless, I hope 'technician' implies some experience with voltage, current and resistance beyond sticking the paperclip in the outlet:eek:

After reading a bunch of your posts, MsHilarious, it seems the EE is already in your head, so I think it can come on out now:)

I came out years ago, I'm an accountant. Trouble is my IQ is 5 points too high for accountant and 5 points too low for engineer. Oh well, beats working.
 
I came out years ago, I'm an accountant. Trouble is my IQ is 5 points too high for accountant and 5 points too low for engineer. Oh well, beats working.

haha! 5 points too low? I'm thinking maybe you don't hang around with a lot of engineers if you think that...:D
 
it's that glowing glass thing that behringer puts in their gear and charges you double for. if it's an Ultra or Pro model, you better be prepaired to pay triple.

HA HA HA ....you know you right.
Now is that glowing glass thing an LED light?
 
Preamp tubes
then there's "in the tube":
SuperStock_1760-1520.jpg
Power tubes
http://www.waveridersgallery.net/catalog2/surfphotographer-jamie-scott-c-23_40.html
If you hadn't I suppose I would have..:)
 
haha! 5 points too low? I'm thinking maybe you don't hang around with a lot of engineers if you think that...:D

Nah, it's just reality. IQ doesn't equate to common sense, but it does track pretty closely with ability to comprehend higher math. I mean, they make you take calculus to become an accountant, but it's "business" calculus (i.e. calculus lite), and you can flush it right after you finish as it has little application in accountancy. Unless you go into postgrad research, but then you need more stats than anything else.

So while I'm sure there are a lot of engineers who are social idiots, I have confidence that they all at one point in their life could do math. And the hardcore computer science types I knew in an old job I had definitely weren't idiots. The owner of one company I worked for (hint: he had a lot more to do with the interwebs than Al Gore) wrote our billing system. You had to use Unix commands to retrieve customer accounts, it was hilarious. Now, customer service reps aren't normally Unix literate, but they had to be there! I bet he coded it in his spare time over a weekend, too . . .

Safe to say I know the difference between actual genius and pretend genius. I'm more of the latter.
 
Safe to say I know the difference between actual genius and pretend genius. I'm more of the latter.

:DWell okay then! I didn't actually mean to say engineers were idiots, but I re-read my post & can see how you got there. Sorry about that! Afterall, engineers are why we move forward. That said, I always thought accounting was math heavy. Go figure
 
:DWell okay then! I didn't actually mean to say engineers were idiots, but I re-read my post & can see how you got there. Sorry about that! Afterall, engineers are why we move forward. That said, I always thought accounting was math heavy. Go figure

Not really. On a day to day basis, your average accountant only needs to demonstrate sixth grade math skills. +-*/%, that's about it. There are some rare situations where algebra is called for, but those functions are either programmed into the accounting system or solved by most accountants by iteration. Time-value-of-money calcs use low-grade calculus, but 99% of accountants cannot derive or solve the equations, we just use financial calculators or spreadsheet formulae. Auditing uses basic statistical methods, but in practice those are reduced to standard practices and rules-of-thumb. Nobody in practice is doing regression analysis or calculating significance of t-stat. Academics do that in research, but that is hardly particular to accountancy.

(I remember reading on article on the "lattice" model of option valuation, which to me seemed to be a dumbed-down spreadsheet exercise for persons incapable of understanding the beautiful statistical method of the Black-Scholes-Merton technique. Then I noticed the article was written by my thesis advisor--D'Oh! :eek: Who is a very, very smart guy and a subject-matter expert :o )

People who think accounting is hard course work generally have IQs in the 115 range and end up as finance or management majors. CPAs are generally 120-130, compare that with 140-145 for engineers and 150-160 for scientists.
 
wtf? there has been WAY too much geek-speak in this thread. let me break it down for you:

An essay on tubes​

While many learned professors have abandoned hope of ever discovering the truth behind tubes, I for one feel that it is still a worthy cause for examination. Advancments in tubes can be linked to many areas. Though tubes is a favourite topic of discussion amongst monarchs, presidents and dictators, tubes is featuring more and more in the ideals of the young and upwardly mobile. It still has the power to shock socialists, obviously. Complex though it is I shall now attempt to provide an exaustive report on tubes and its numerous 'industries'.

Social Factors

While some scholars have claimed that there is no such thing as society, this is rubbish. When J H Darcy said 'fevour will spread' [1] she borrowed much from tubes. While deviating from the norm will always cause unrest amongst ones peers, tubes raises the question 'why?'

Did I mention how lovely tubes is? Just as a dog will return to its own sick, society will return to tubes, again and again.

Economic Factors

Derived from 'oikonomikos,' which means skilled in household management, the word economics is synonymous with tubes. Of course, tubes fits perfectly into the Custard-Not-Mustard model, making allowances for recent changes in interest rates.
National
Debt

tubes

When displayed this way it becomes very clear that tubes is of great importance. My personal view is that the national debt will eventually break free from the powerful influence of tubes, but not before we see a standardised commercial policy for all. A sharp down turn in middle class investment may lead to changes in the market.

Political Factors

Politics, we all agree, is a fact of life. Contrasting the numerous political activists campaigning for the interests of tubes can be like looking at tubes and ones own image of themselves.

We cannot talk of tubes and politics without remembering the words of nobel prize winner Xaviera H. Amster 'The success of any political system can only truly be assessed once the fat lady has sung.' [2] One cannot help but agree when faced with tubes, that this highlights an important issue. It would be wise to approach the subject with the thought that 'if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all'. However this can lead to missing out important facts.
One thing's certain. The Human species liberally desires tubes, and what's more human than politics?

Conclusion

To conclude, tubes is both a need and a want. It enriches, influences the influencers, and never hides.

The final say goes to the award winning Nicole Beckham: 'I demand tubes, nothing more nothing less.' [3]

[1] J H Darcy - The Spaniard - 1988 - PPT

[2] Amster - The Popular Vote - 2002 Worldwide Publishing

[3] Sham Magazine - Issue 124 - Monkey Books

been way tooooooo long since i've read one of these diatribes.... carry on...
 
I came out years ago, I'm an accountant. Trouble is my IQ is 5 points too high for accountant and 5 points too low for engineer. Oh well, beats working.

Why, for some reason, I'm suspicious of anyone who willingly takes an IQ test... Even more, when they remember their score.

Dr. V
 
Why, for some reason, I'm suspicious of anyone who willingly takes an IQ test... Even more, when they remember their score.

Dr. V

Personally, I really don't care if you are suspicious of me or not; I will sleep soundly tonight either way. Anyway, one doesn't need to remember their IQ test score (don't know that I have taken one since third grade when I was forced to), but the correlation between many types of other standardized tests and IQ is so high that all I really need to remember is my SAT score, the year I took it, and how to use teh Googles to cross-reference the two statistics.

Even if you were too drunk or stoned to remember your SAT score, it's not very difficult to estimate your intelligence versus other people you know, and derive an IQ score within 10 points from that experience.
 
Personally, I really don't care if you are suspicious of me or not; I will sleep soundly tonight either way. Anyway, one doesn't need to remember their IQ test score (don't know that I have taken one since third grade when I was forced to), but the correlation between many types of other standardized tests and IQ is so high that all I really need to remember is my SAT score, the year I took it, and how to use teh Googles to cross-reference the two statistics.

Even if you were too drunk or stoned to remember your SAT score, it's not very difficult to estimate your intelligence versus other people you know, and derive an IQ score within 10 points from that experience.

C3P0, is that you?! :eek:
 
During the summer as a child we all use to go tuben down the river.Ah to be young again
 
Even if you were too drunk or stoned to remember your SAT score, it's not very difficult to estimate your intelligence versus other people you know, and derive an IQ score within 10 points from that experience.

well just to keep things in perspective, back in the day, every drug store had a little combo-cupboard full of tubes with a tester on top. This is where the mica meets voltage, and the "wiggle" factor came into play. Speaking of, there is much wiggle factor in an IQ test, as these are largely based upon what you know.... not what you are capable of knowing, so "IQ" becomes more of a data storage ideal instead of a neuron count, which as we know is pretty much a done deal by the time you are 5 years old or thereabouts.

Since I just made up 71.547026% of my statements above, I'll make up another... or at least prompt someone to go look it up. China is presently graduating 450,000 engineers each year. This is larger than the total number of engineers in the US. If I believed that on average, these 450,000 had IQs in the 140-145 range, I would also believe that a saturated transistor sounds the same as a saturated vacuum tube, and that the saturated brains of our sigma black belt engineering ranks, who, by the way depend heavily upon regression analysis to depict productivity and cost savings.... never ever meet their statistical mark. Why? Variation, of course. This is also why tubes have to be matched by non-engineering folks who look at uncalibrated meters and write values on the boxes.:D

an PS... I'm just havin fun... so please don't take this too seriously
 
Back
Top