we dont need no stiinkiiinn protools...

  • Thread starter Thread starter dementedchord
  • Start date Start date
I checked out several of his tunes.....wish I could play like that....
 
that settles it!
if you use Nuendo...you support a Nazi Germany.

I'll stay American, and stick with Pro Tools.
 
But Pro-Tools LE came with Melodyne?!

NOW WHAT DO I DO!

I wonder how persuading his voice would be with the "Cher Effect" on it.:rolleyes:

Isn't Pro-tools more like the dictator though?
 
First of all you see all of the smart people left the room cause they know which is better lol.

Now down to business

Obviously whomever made the video doesn't know much about pro tools because it says you can't punch in but they knew how to actually work the program you can. Also it says that it will be over compressed and something else can't remember, but the program doesn't make you sound over compressed it would be the person actually mixing. And it says protools is an expensive program when protools LE is actually cheaper than nuendo.

I actually used Nuendo for 2 years before switching to protools and the only thing that nuendo has over protools is unlimited tracks but if you know how to mix and record that actually isn't even an issue. Pro Tools is actually easier to use than nuendo. It is easier to setup aux tracks and run through them than Nuendo.

Finally.....If you come here to protools bash leave now because almost all of us PT users have tried all of the other programs out there because we didn't want to have to buy hardware to run a program but guess what we made the leap because PT had something to offer us that the other programs didn't. So thank you and have a nice day.
 
RD423 said:
Finally.....If you come here to protools bash leave now because almost all of us PT users have tried all of the other programs out there because we didn't want to have to buy hardware to run a program but guess what we made the leap because PT had something to offer us that the other programs didn't. So thank you and have a nice day.
Click to expand...



uhhh.... vanna yhis guy would like to buy a vowel....
 
RD423 said:
First of all you see all of the smart people left the room cause they know which is better lol.

Now down to business

Obviously whomever made the video doesn't know much about pro tools because it says you can't punch in but they knew how to actually work the program you can. Also it says that it will be over compressed and something else can't remember, but the program doesn't make you sound over compressed it would be the person actually mixing. And it says protools is an expensive program when protools LE is actually cheaper than nuendo.

I actually used Nuendo for 2 years before switching to protools and the only thing that nuendo has over protools is unlimited tracks but if you know how to mix and record that actually isn't even an issue. Pro Tools is actually easier to use than nuendo. It is easier to setup aux tracks and run through them than Nuendo.

Finally.....If you come here to protools bash leave now because almost all of us PT users have tried all of the other programs out there because we didn't want to have to buy hardware to run a program but guess what we made the leap because PT had something to offer us that the other programs didn't. So thank you and have a nice day.
Click to expand...

im with you on this one. iv had cubase and live, used logic, Fl studio, audacity ... im running out of memory now. but yea, i love pro-tools, how the hell is it too expensive? its £149.99 for the cheapest version or £195 for one with inputs to record with. thats an ok price.

its powerful, reliable, easy to navigate, and always being updated with new bits to play with

use the software before you bash it yea

get a life
 
RD423 said:
Obviously whomever made the video doesn't know much about pro tools because it says you can't punch in but they knew how to actually work the program you can. Also it says that it will be over compressed and something else can't remember, but the program doesn't make you sound over compressed it would be the person actually mixing. And it says protools is an expensive program when protools LE is actually cheaper than nuendo.

I actually used Nuendo for 2 years before switching to protools and the only thing that nuendo has over protools is unlimited tracks but if you know how to mix and record that actually isn't even an issue. Pro Tools is actually easier to use than nuendo. It is easier to setup aux tracks and run through them than Nuendo.

Finally.....If you come here to protools bash leave now because almost all of us PT users have tried all of the other programs out there because we didn't want to have to buy hardware to run a program but guess what we made the leap because PT had something to offer us that the other programs didn't. So thank you and have a nice day.
Click to expand...



Hey Mr. Sandy Vag, I think it was supposed to be a joke :)
 
My girlfriend thought it was funny.:)

Thanks for posting it, I usually can't make her laugh.
 
Used cubase vst then cubase sx3 then tried protools m-audio, it just seems counter intuitive to cubase so I sold it and bought cubase studio 4 and I'm very happy with it.

Pro tools isn't inferior, just didn't want to take the time to learn another program. Spent enough time learning cubase in the first place

He's totally right about melodyne though, Anteres SUCKS BALLS!
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top