Volume Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter black aspirin
  • Start date Start date
B

black aspirin

New member
Okay, newbie time. I actually hope this is some stupid little mistake of my own; any embarrassment would be well worth overcoming this problem.

Everything I record comes out at very low volume. I use a Roland VS2400 recorder, and I set input levels at just below the red. I record direct from a drum machine, and usually one bass track direct as well. For guitar and distorted bass tracks, I use two Shure SM57's and a Beta52, setting levels just below the red. I've tried close miking, a few feet away, 6-7 feet away and combinations of all three.

Yet the finished product is at very low volume. I've even had tracks with horrible clipping, yet you had to turn the stereo up twice as loud just to hear the mix. What gives?

I had the same trouble with my previous recorder, a Fostex MR-8.
 
I am not sure man, but did you try mastering it? Make sure that you bounced tracks mix has a good level too.
 
black aspirin said:
I use a Roland VS2400 recorder, and I set input levels at just below the red.
STOP THAT - (Oh Geez, doesn't anybody get the basics anymore?).

You're recording WAAAAAAAAAAAAY too hot. Line level on that unit is going to be probably around -18dBFS or so. You're *overdriving* the signal on the input. You don't want to be even *close* to "the red" zone. You want to be around 0dBVU. NOT -0dBFS. 0dBVU is going to be "around" -18dBFS at the input.
black aspirin said:
I record direct from a drum machine, and usually one bass track direct as well. For guitar and distorted bass tracks, I use two Shure SM57's and a Beta52, setting levels just below the red. I've tried close miking, a few feet away, 6-7 feet away and combinations of all three.
Same thing. You're *crushing* the preamps with signal.

And you're probably mixing way too loud also... But that's for another thread... You have headroom. You *NEED* headroom. Use it.

YOU WILL NOT GET A LOUD RECORDING FROM RECORDING YOUR TRACKS TOO HOT. Actually, it will normally work against you. As you add all that distortion (small amounts on ever track adds up to a lot of sh*t later on) and lose all that clarity and focus, you'll wind up with a muddy, small, pinched sounding mix that won't have the ability to handle the "volume abuse" of the mastering stage (which is where you'll be concentrating on volume - unfortunately).
black aspirin said:
Yet the finished product is at very low volume. I've even had tracks with horrible clipping, yet you had to turn the stereo up twice as loud just to hear the mix. What gives?
You shouldn't be concentrating on sheer volume during tracking and mixing anyway. You shouldn't expect an unmastered mix to compete with commercial recordings. You shouldn't expect (how do I say this) "novice" mixes to have the same volume potential as recordings that were made by teams of industry professionals either. In any case, you're shooting yourself in the foot before you even load the gun here.
black aspirin said:
I had the same trouble with my previous recorder, a Fostex MR-8.
And you'll have the same problem with every piece of gear you own until you start using it as it's designed to work.
Either start ignoring your digital meters and use the VU meters on the preamps or figure that you're looking for signals that ride around -18 or -16dBFS at the track level. A transient here or there that whacks against -10 or -9dBFS isn't going to hurt much, but the bulk of the signal should ride around -18dBFS or so. Mixing, more or less the same thing. Maybe a whisker hotter. You should be able to start the mix with everything at unity and NOT have problematic clipping. You'll probably have to turn things down a bit, but not like you'd have to with ultra-hot signals (which you'd probably have to turn down to - oh, around -18 or so to prevent problematic clipping. Getting the picture?).

When I'm running mixes, I try to keep the very top peak below -6dBFS with the "bulk" of the level riding around -18 or -20dBFS or so. Plenty hot, yet a decent amount of headroom for the mastering stage.

And NO - This ISN'T going to make your mixes louder. Unmastered mixes aren't that loud. Unfortunately, "loud" has become rather important to some people for some strange reason. But that's still saved for later. Generally speaking, you want to keep, to have, to hold, to cherish as much headroom as you can at every single step of the game *UNTIL* all that headroom is abused & used during the final stages.

Again, I hate the volume wars passionately. But almost without question, the mixes that leave here the loudest are the ones that came in the quietest. And when I say "quiet" I mean "normal." 0dBVU has been a standard for over 60 years. Digital didn't change that. It was designed around it.
 
Last edited:
Massive Master said:
STOP THAT - (Oh Geez, doesn't anybody get the basics anymore?).

Nope, that's why I'm here.

Let me clarify, because my usage of terminology is....well, not good.

The master level and track level are set at 0dBVU. Then the input level is brought up until the bulk of the track meter is around -12 to -18, normally. The meter goes yellow at about -12, and red at about -4. I've peaked as high as -6, but usually stay around -12 for the peak, and about -16 for the bulk of it.

So being "below the red" means peaking at about -12 on the track meter, and having the bulk around -16. This is where I normally record.

When mastering, you can only go +6, and it starts distorting at +3, which really doesn't gain much volume. Am I misunderstanding still?
 
Is the signal distorting?

If not, turn it up and quit looking at the pretty lights.
 
ez_willis said:
Listen with your ears, not your eyes.

The last time I did that is when there was horrible clipping once it was burned to CD. That's what made me start watching the meter more closely.

Here's what's strange about that clipping incident....on the track with clipping (pops and hisses), it didn't show up until I played it on my car stereo. It was fine on the headphones during mixing, and the computer speakers and home stereo, though.

Is that strange?
 
what is......

massive master, I'm new to this also, but not having these same problems. still, I'm curious, what is dBFS and dBVU?
 
ryanr said:
massive master, I'm new to this also, but not having these same problems. still, I'm curious, what is dBFS and dBVU?
0 dBFS represents the highest possible level in digital gear. All other measurements expressed in terms of dBFS will always be less than 0 dB.

Here

Regarding dBVU, read this. It may not give you any better understanding of it but what the hell.
 
jonnyc said:
AHHHHH. Well your first problem is you need some good monitors.

I know.....I've been looking into them, will have a pair pretty soon.
 
ryanr said:
massive master, I'm new to this also, but not having these same problems. still, I'm curious, what is dBFS and dBVU?
( sigh :( )

I don't mean to sound jaded, but this is the stuff that everyone should have a handle on before they're allowed near a "RECORD" button - This is day one of recording class - Things you should know before you even know the instructor's name.

0 dBVU (really, really basically here) is line level. This is where all of your gear - Preamps, compressors, EQ's, *converters* (yes, even converters) are designed to work at. This is where the sound is best, the clarity, the focus, the "air" - the lowest distortion, the ideal signal-to-noise ratio -

-0dBFS ("-" as nothing can ever really be "+" in digital) is the very top of the digital scale -- "All 1's" if you will. Nothing can have a higher signal.

Depending on how the gear is calibrated, 0dBVU is normally going to be around -18dBFS (full-scale - Digital range). This "buffer zone" is headroom that's "built in" to the process. 18dB (or so) of transient headroom before clipping. This is where your levels should be when you're recording. This is more or less where the bulk of your mix should be sitting during mixdown.

This is how the system is designed. This is how it's been done "downtown" since long before digital recording was a dream. And digital didn't change that.

Pushing input signals hotter than line level is taking the gear beyond where it was designed to run. You add distortion, you lose "focus" and clarity, you add noise, you "pinch" dynamics - While it might not be incredibly noticable (especially on poor monitoring) on a track or two, when you stack all that goop together during a mixdown, you wind up with a "small" and veiled sounding mix that lacks clarity and space, focus on and between instruments, extreme difficulty EQ'ing instruments to sit well together - All sorts of nasties.

Some gear handles the "abuse" much better than other gear. But even so, running gear with the headroom it's designed to have almost always produces noticably better sounding recordings in the end.
 
black aspirin said:
When mastering, you can only go +6, and it starts distorting at +3, which really doesn't gain much volume. Am I misunderstanding still?
+6 and +3? Are you looking at the meters or the scale next to the fader?

Mastering is a separate process. I've worked with the VS2480, what you have to do is mix it as it is. Then, import the mix into a new session and aply the mastering effects. (I think I remember it having something call the mastering room) EQ, Compression and limiting are what will allow you to increase the volume of the track.
 
massive master threw down some great posts in this thread. very informative. im bookmarking this one. :cool:
 
Farview said:
+6 and +3? Are you looking at the meters or the scale next to the fader?

Mastering is a separate process. I've worked with the VS2480, what you have to do is mix it as it is. Then, import the mix into a new session and aply the mastering effects. (I think I remember it having something call the mastering room) EQ, Compression and limiting are what will allow you to increase the volume of the track.

Yes, I'm talking about the fader levels. Sorry.

I had some good success when trying the effects patches during mastering, there are some basic EQ patches that worked well for a beginner like me. I've messed around with EQ'ing each track and such, but without any knowledge, I'm bound to do more harm than good.

I'm gonna start looking into a course to take.
 
Back
Top