The info provided leads me to want to point out a couple of things.
1. Unbalanced = inexpensive consumer audio ; Balanced = Pro-audio. If your not using pro audio level gear don't complain about signal quality.
2. To fix this problem either A: Get a better mic B: get a balanced/unbalanced converter box.
Bit harsh? The OP has done everything right. Ok, cheap mic at $30 but not the cheapest you will find by a long chalk. It IS a Shure and purports at least to be balanced...I was fooled and I have been "at it" best part of 50 years!
Plugging an unbalanced mic into a transformer box is unlikely to improve things. The output of the mic needs to be clean and balanced.
But...FFS can somebody get a digital guessing box on that effing mic? PLEASE!
Dave.
Bit harsh? The OP has done everything right. Ok, cheap mic at $30 but not the cheapest you will find by a long chalk. It IS a Shure and purports at least to be balanced...I was fooled and I have been "at it" best part of 50 years!
Plugging an unbalanced mic into a transformer box is unlikely to improve things. The output of the mic needs to be clean and balanced.
But...FFS can somebody get a digital guessing box on that effing mic? PLEASE!
Dave.
Sorry, It's not my normal self. It's a strange reaction that occurs whenever I see the word karaoke.
Not trying to be a mic snob here,. I love cheap stuff. Just trying to look at it from a right tools for the job perspective.
Op has already stated that the problem goes away when he uses the supplied cable.
The SV100 is rated at 600ohms impedence, is supplied with a HiZ cable, and is marketed to be used with consumer level gear.
The cost of a microphone has absolutely no bearing on its ability to deliver a quiet signal, so long as it is balanced it should be as good as one 3 or 4 times the price (tho' not many have the humbucking ability of the SM7b) . As I mentioned at the top of the thread, the SV100 is specced' as having about 6 dB greater sensitivity than a 57 so signal should not be a problem.
I might have to order one and rip it apart!
Dave.
I double dare ya dave.
I've been pretty much certain the problem was the faulty cheap XLR cable, honestly surprised nobody's backed me up on that yet.
Are you using a known working XLR-XLR cable? Hopefully you're not using an XLR-1/4" cable.
Has a different XLR-XLR cable been used successfully, or is it just the XLR-TS cable that's known to work?
Has a different XLR-XLR cable been used successfully, or is it just the XLR-TS cable that's known to work?
It could be a faulty cable...but a cable can't create 60Hz interference all by itself. USUALLY, with a balanced cable it just works or doesn't (or perhaps crackles when you wiggle it). A faulty ground can make a balanced cable susceptible to outside electrical interference...but it bugs me that the 60Hz must be coming from somewhere and, by going to battery, you've pretty much ruled out the computer power supply.
" The first connection is XLR. If the insides of the mic cancel out the balanced signal, what would have been the point?"
Yes Rock' totally agree! No point at all but they DO do it! Not Shure of course but somewhere along the line in a Chinese factory the error was made and so has persisted.
I cannot know for sure of course and it is very frustrating for me to sit here with the means to find out in seconds and you cannot!
And so I shall continue to bang on about musicians and recordists buying the very basic means of circuit testing. You COULD build a house without a line and level I suppose....But wouldn't want to be inside it!
Dave.
So Dave, with a multimeter I could also test to see if the mic is internally balanced? Don't be frustrated.. we'll figure it out sooner or later!