
cjacek
Analogue Enthusiast
Hi,
It's quite likely that you might be sick of giving opinions with regards to this processor and I've read that some of you don't particularly like Behringer. Please be as objective as possible and think of the ULTRA-VOICE® VX2000 as just another product from some unknown company
Anyway, briefly, here's my set-up:
1. SHURE BETA 58A
goes to ..
2. ART TUBE MP
goes to ..
3. TASCAM 414
4. ALESIS NANOVERB (fed through the EFFECTS 1 SEND, on the back of the 414 and into 5-6, 7-8 STEREO INPUTS).
***My main concern is to give my vocals more presence/sparkle, warmth and make sure that very occassional "clipping" does not occur - some slight compression migh also be helpful***
As you can see, any "processing" (except the NANOVERB processing) would be recorded directly to the 414. My main concern is my vocals as I sing to pre-recorderd music. I've perfected my setup in the last 2 years of doing this and am getting good results. (Yes I tried a condenser mic but I prefer a handheld dynamic mic). As you can see my setup is rather simple and I wish to keep it this way. Anyway, I found the ULTRA-VOICE® VX2000 and I was wondering if the VX2000's mic pre-amp is a STEP UP from the ART TUBE MP ? Other than that, and please keep in mind my simple set-up, would the VX2000 be a quality piece of gear ? Please don't compare it to any $5000 gear but for someone who wishes to get better results from his current set-up at a very reasonable and budget price, would it be a move in a "BETTER" direction ? Would it be a bad move for me to get the VX2000 ? I mean, ya can't ignore the price of the VX2000 which is just over $100 bucks US in some places
For what the VX2000 is, how would you rate the (1) mic preamp, (2) equalizer, (3) compressor, (4) de-esser and (5) tube emulation. Thanks and be kind please 
Daniel
It's quite likely that you might be sick of giving opinions with regards to this processor and I've read that some of you don't particularly like Behringer. Please be as objective as possible and think of the ULTRA-VOICE® VX2000 as just another product from some unknown company

1. SHURE BETA 58A
goes to ..
2. ART TUBE MP
goes to ..
3. TASCAM 414
4. ALESIS NANOVERB (fed through the EFFECTS 1 SEND, on the back of the 414 and into 5-6, 7-8 STEREO INPUTS).
***My main concern is to give my vocals more presence/sparkle, warmth and make sure that very occassional "clipping" does not occur - some slight compression migh also be helpful***
As you can see, any "processing" (except the NANOVERB processing) would be recorded directly to the 414. My main concern is my vocals as I sing to pre-recorderd music. I've perfected my setup in the last 2 years of doing this and am getting good results. (Yes I tried a condenser mic but I prefer a handheld dynamic mic). As you can see my setup is rather simple and I wish to keep it this way. Anyway, I found the ULTRA-VOICE® VX2000 and I was wondering if the VX2000's mic pre-amp is a STEP UP from the ART TUBE MP ? Other than that, and please keep in mind my simple set-up, would the VX2000 be a quality piece of gear ? Please don't compare it to any $5000 gear but for someone who wishes to get better results from his current set-up at a very reasonable and budget price, would it be a move in a "BETTER" direction ? Would it be a bad move for me to get the VX2000 ? I mean, ya can't ignore the price of the VX2000 which is just over $100 bucks US in some places



Daniel