I don't know if he was being smug, and maybe the "source=95%" thing is a bit extreme, though I think he was saying that more for effect.
Sort of (for effect - not the 'smug' part).
For instance -- "Back in the day" had a band come into
the studio and we recorded for a few days some of the worst-sounding - everything (drums, bass, guitars, etc.) I've ever had the displeasure of recording. These horrible Crate amplifiers, some (I don't even remember the brand) bass, a drum set that should've had a picture of "Animal" from the Muppets on the kick head...
Spent days trying to get usable mixes. This is all analog stuff here, so no tweaking and saving and tweaking and saving... Eventually wound up with a semi-listenable, yet "small" sounding CD.
A year later, they're back. "We really like what you did last time and we were hoping that you'd sort of be the 'producer' on this one - Whaddya' think?"
I asked them if they brought all of their gear again. They replied in the affirmative. I told them to leave all their gear outside and c'mon in.
We spent a couple hours restringing and strobing *my* guitars and properly tuning the house kit and we proceeded to pound out death-metal's answer to Metallica's "Black" album in probably two days. Laney AOR amplifiers with G12M70-loaded cabinets, Tama kit with fresh Remo Pinstripes tuned to E pentatonic friendly notes (just on the sharp side - I've always preferred that for some
reason), my drummer's cymbals -- But otherwise, the same rooms, the same mics, the same recording and mixing gear (decent stuff, but nothing spectacular) as the last album.
It was huge. It was dynamic. It almost mixed itself. A little reverb, a little compression on the kick and snare, 17ms between the left and right overheads (I still do that on the rare occasion that I'm mixing), barely any EQ on anything. Did so well regionally that they ended up doing a lot of gigging and made enough money to turn their passive marijuana use into hard-core heroin addictions (that's really for another forum).
It was all about the source.
Granted - that's more about instruments. But the same thing applies to vocals. And although it's far too late to "long-story short" anything, most of the "I can't get my vocals to sound good" issues wind up being the vocalist more than the gear.
And don't get me wrong -- I'm not disagreeing with RAMI by any stretch (I threw in the 'gear snob' thing for fun against his "Now, I'm not a gear snob or anything..." or whatever that was). It's evident that he's using the bottom-of-the-barrel as far as gear is concerned (that interface looks like a "counterfeit" of an already freakishly inexpensive Focusrite unit) and --- uh --- where is it...
Also i have 2 30x30 acoustic foams right behind me. The room is quit big but has suprisingly decent acoustic "as is". It's about 4x5, and has one window aprox. 2meters from me.
There it is. His room is probably terrible if it's a 12x15 rectangle with two completely useless 30x30 sheets of foam on the wall when he actually needs a dozen broadband panels to
control that space. Add to that a mic that's going on CL for $15 and a knock-off interface and I can totally see RAMI's point from page one.
But I'd wonder if he has a decent voice also.