elementary
New member
A thought occured to me today and I'm sure its probably come up before, but if Steinberg charged about 30 or 40 quid for Cubase do you think they might actually make more money?
Every kid who wants to record his/her band goes and grabs a dodgy copy of cubase because realistically, only people who are very serious about recording will be willing or able to spend 400 quid on something with no resale value which will go out of date in a year or two. Most students could stretch to £40 and Steinberg would definitely sell a lot more copies if they drastically lowered their prices.
With people I know, being a young student who knows lots of bands, I would say there is about a 12-1 ratio of illegitimate copies to legit copies and if cubase charged £40 a copy compared to £400ish, with my small sample Steinberg would stand to make more money if they lowered their prices and the pirates bought copies (which I know a lot of people would do).
Is the high price a purely prestige thing?
I am in no way advocating piracy here, its just an interesting point.
Every kid who wants to record his/her band goes and grabs a dodgy copy of cubase because realistically, only people who are very serious about recording will be willing or able to spend 400 quid on something with no resale value which will go out of date in a year or two. Most students could stretch to £40 and Steinberg would definitely sell a lot more copies if they drastically lowered their prices.
With people I know, being a young student who knows lots of bands, I would say there is about a 12-1 ratio of illegitimate copies to legit copies and if cubase charged £40 a copy compared to £400ish, with my small sample Steinberg would stand to make more money if they lowered their prices and the pirates bought copies (which I know a lot of people would do).
Is the high price a purely prestige thing?
I am in no way advocating piracy here, its just an interesting point.