The $1000 solution for everything audio!

  • Thread starter Thread starter sonusman
  • Start date Start date
So here is my take on the above.

1 - Toobs, solid state, hybrids, whatever. If they pass signal, they will have their virtues and their crap factors. I have used Bruce Averill pre's that couldn't touch a Mackie in certain applications.

2 - Well performed parts with a proper tone will usually require little to no compression to make it stand out in a mix. EVERYTHING in a mix doesn't have sit up front and center!

3 - Reverb is cool. Effects are cool. Use them to ENHANCE an already good mix. Do not make your mix rely on them.

4 - Right out of Harvey Gerst's own mouth: Any mic can sound great in any application. Learn to use what you have to it's fullest potential.

5 - Kill the early reflections in your room! THAT in itself will go the farthest is helping you hear your audio at it's best. Most "low end" problems go away when you can hear transients that are not clouded by frequencies in the 160-400Hz range. I will tell you all the truth. I have never heard the difference between bass traps being installed and not. NEVER. If it still concerns you, put a chair in the corner. That way, you at least have a place for one of the artist to sit (or your friend), and that will do probably just as much for low end build up in the corners IF that is what the biggest problem is! I can assure most of you though that you probably have much bigger problems in your room than a little bass build up in the corners that have dramatic effects on what your hear! Simply putting bass traps in a room will do little if other acoustical problems that have far more bearing on what you hear are prevelent. Early reflections are what cloud what you hear. Kill them and you can work. John Sayers mid/low traps on side walls will make far more difference in the acoustical environment than any bass trap will! Period. Consider bass traps once you have solved the bigger problems of the early reflections from the wall behind the monitor and the side walls are solved. I think you will find that after solving those problems, you will hear little difference at your mix position with or without bass traps installed.

The above is my opinion based upon just doing this stuff for a long time. I have no credentials as an acoustic designer. I never claimed that I do, and never will. If you want to build/purchase bass traps, knock yourself out! My experience has been that they don't make enough of a difference to worry too much about them. Learning to use a high pass filter on tracks that don't need low end in them will sure help a lot though! :)

Rick, you actually make some great points about "schools of thought". You can take mine if you choose. You can leave it too. I asked for NOTHING in offering mine! You didn't have to purchase a book to read mine. It was freely given. Sorry if you haven't ever heard any of my work. In the last year, I haven't posted much of it. But I have posted probably no less than 100 mp3's over the 3 years or so of stuff I have worked on. Not just the stuff I thought turned out well. I have posted some pretty bad sounding stuff friend!!! Stuff that HURT to listen to. Usually, I offered "opinions" about what went wrong with the bad sounding stuff, as well as what I thought went right with the good sounding stuff.

At least annually, I post something here where the gist is:

Just start recording! MIX MIX MIX MIX!!! Try EVERYTHING! LEARN from it all.

You can read until you are blue in the face about audio. Think of it like this:

You can study music theory. Does that make you play your instrument any better?

Absolutely not! You have to practice.

I think sometimes people are asking the wrong questions but don't know it. They feel they have a problem with their audio and need a solution. 99 times out of 100 the problem is they didn't actually try doing something different than what they did! If I have learned anything about audio over the years it is simply that if something isn't working, I try something else! I keep trying until I run out of time, or I get what I want.

I have been just as guilty over the years of recommending gear to overcome problems in audio. Too many times, I have made statements that you gotta have this or that to get a good sound. You know what actually made me slow down on that? John Sayers once posted two mp3's of a piano, one mic'ed with a AT 4050 mic, and one of the same piano and performance mic'ed with a Shure SM-58. He simply asked people to guess which was which. Not a single person could guess with CERTAINTY which was which because they sounded mostly identical! I have posted mp3's where the ART preamp was what was mostly used and had people give the audio high praises. Many comments that it sounded about as good as anything they have heard in the same genre.

Most of what I have ever posted was recorded in basements! Mixed in basements or bedrooms. You know how I got over the horrible acoustics and made pretty decent sounding recordings under these less than ideal circumstances? I EXPERIMENTED. I REFERENCED my work. I did LOT'S of "push mixes" and played them on other systems. Just good ol' tried and true stuff here. The very same things that most any ol' big time engineer REALLY does. If a mix had too much bass, well, I turned down the bass. I made myself adapt to the situation because frankly, it is MUCH cheaper for me to experiment and adapt than to purchase new gear and build acoustical treatments in the attempt to create the "perfect" monitoring environment.

JUST DO IT! Nike had it right (heh..I happen to live about two miles from the world headquarters...nice property...)

As to what some you feel is my "condescending attitude" and what not.

1 - Some of your guys come across as such nice guys on the bbs and are probably big jerks in person! Toche'!!! If you place a lot of value and your own personal worth on MY online persona, I feel very bad for you.

It is not that I don't empathize. When I was in college, I had instructors that seemed very condescending and had that "know it all" attitude. Thing was, I learned the most from them. Regardless of what I personally felt about their "style", they had a LOT to offer and I took it! What I did find out about them once I got over my little bruised ego was that some of these instructors were in fact very nice people and gave me a lot of "out of class" time to explain things to me when I sought that out from them. They usually were very quick to admit what they didn't know if I asked questions in those areas.

I have a contact list on MSM (microsoft messenger) that is full of "audio people" that I talk to. A couple of these guys have worked on stuff that most of your have probably heard. Others are just guys starting out in audio. Others are people about where I am at in engineering. We have a great time chatting. We all learn from each other. In my opinion, I have a LOT of patience and am pretty good at getting to the point and understanding where the problems really are.

Sometimes, a thread like this does far more to get people's attention than being proper and polite. Like it or not, that is the approach I take. Frankly, if you don't like WHAT or HOW I post, don't read it! It is as simple as that. But please people. If you are going to lash out at me with insults and long tirades about how I am condescending and arrogant and what not, and tell me how wrong that all is, maybe you should look in the mirror! If you truely feel that way about me, then in my eyes, you came down to that same level. If you feel you don't need my condescending attitude concerning audio, certainly you can understand that I don't feel I need YOUR condescending attitude concerning what your perceive as being my intent! Is it an eye for an eye with some of you? "Ol' Ed can be that way. So will I!" :rolleyes:

You don't have to take my word for it, but really, I am a pretty nice guy if I say so myself! I will not even begin to try to justify my online persona. It is okay for some. Others don't like it. Take it or leave it. But at least try to understand first what I am talking about.

This post started because of a conversation I had with another engineer who's work I respect highly. I made the comment that bass traps seem to be the new "cure-all" thing. She said "I thought it was compression/limiting". I told her that was last years cure-all and that it was tubes the year before that. It just grew. She finally made the comment that she could solve all her audio problems for about $1000. I thought it was funny and started this post.

Glad a few got it! :D

Ed
 
sir, by quoting me, you are infringing on my unintellectual property....dont make me get my lawyer on ya........:rolleyes:
 
I thought the thread was down right entertaining and did not for a moment take it seriously...or should I have? Crap...now I am confused!!

Brutus...now living in San Antonio, TX.
 
It's healthy to have a provocative thread going.
It brings out a lot of interesting things and can expose a lot of B.S. going on.

I wouldn't lose hair over it.
 
I like threads like this. It gets peoples minds going. It helps us dig deeper in the reality of some situations.
Sonusman is cool. Go sonusman!!!
 
I find it interesting as to who took ed seriously and who didn't. I instantly recognised that he was refering to all the TRENDS that have appeared on this and other BBS's for the past few years.. yup it's years now. That mic test that ed mentioned worked for me to prove that most of it is BS. I recently had this guy who was totally confused as to what was the best mike he should buy. So I played him a track and said what do you think of this mike?? that sounds really nice, nice vocal sound, what type is it, I need one?? it's the FET mike in the top of my computer monitor I replied!!

As for acousticians - I have a beef with them - what have they offered society?? Ed's venue is a perfect example - nothing - go to modern restaurants and you can't hear your own conversation because the acoustics are shit! movie theatres sound like shit! railway stations, bus stops, malls, courts, all sound shit because these acousticians with all their uni degrees haven't managed to promote their expertise to have anyone use it on everyday things that need it. There are some acousticians on the web that have only designed one or two studios in their time, and their role in that is dubious, yet because they can give you a complex formula for calculating room modes under water they get everyones ear.

When I first came to HR no one seemed to know or care about acoustics. I mentioned slot resonators (which BTW is 30 - 40 old acoustics from the old BBC days) people had never heard of them.
Slowly I managed to get people to take acoustics seriously because I believe it's serious, an I've managed to convey that. I believe "what hear is what you get" an acoustic guitar in a railway tunnel will sound different then one in a open paddock - the only difference being the acoustic medium.

As I pointed out to someone the other day - how come you are prepared to get someone else to design and manufacture your expensive mic preamp yet you want your acoustics for free whether or not you understand how it works or whether or not you are capable of understanding the drawings/plans, or have the carpentry skills to build them. I bet you don't have the skills to design a mic preamp - so why should you expect to have the acoustic skills??

cheers
JOhn
 
HOLY SHIT. :eek: Thats the most words I've EVER seen John say in one post. Damn, must have pissed him off. Either that or my desease is catching.


Well John, this is all I can say. I'm getting ready to move up around where knightfly lives in 2 months.

I am going to build a studio. But its not going to be my design. Its going to be yours. Because, should you allow me, I intend on commisioning you. Thats how much I trust you. So know this. I will be in touch on a professional level soon. I believe this is the only way I'll ever hear the proof. Enough said. Talk to you soon.
fitz:)
 
I hired John to design the new Blue Bear Sound back in April of last year.... best decision I could have ever made!

Without a single doubt, he absolutely, positively, *KNOWS* his stuff..................
 
HOLY SHIT. Thats the most words I've EVER seen John say in one post. Damn, must have pissed him off.

no you didn't piss me off at all - you just voiced what I'd been thinking for awhile so I just vented because I knew exactly where you were coming from.

Looks like I might be about to build Left Bank II, so there is one client who's happy to do it again in his new house anyway :):)

Cheers
JOhn
 
Hey John, thanks for a little back up.

Hopefully, not many took the initial post as "law". I guess a few did, and feel for some reason that I think I am the sheriff in these parts.:rolleyes: I am not, and won't ever claim to be.

I hope also that nobody thinks I don't value the good acoustical engineering either!!! Having worked in so many bad acoustical spaces, then moving to well tuned acoustical spaces, I totally appreciate what a well thought out acoustical design for any room can do for the sound!

I just happen to think bass traps are ALMOST not needed IF other common acoustical problems are addressed. Yup, seeing the trend of bass traps come up lately, and thought I might make a little fun here. ;)

John, did you get my lengthy email a few days ago? I haven't heard back from you concerning it. It came from a hotmail account.

Ed
 
I just happen to think bass traps are ALMOST not needed IF other common acoustical problems are addressed.

I happen to agree with you Ed which is why I press for low-mid absorption in most cases. A standard drywall on studs is a low end panel absorber anyway and if you create a room with drywall walls in the reverb calculator at SAE it will show a lower reverb time at the low end than in the low mids because of it, but to be honest I agree with you about the use of high pass filters. I use then all the time.

Sorry mate I didn't get your email - I just realised I haven't been to hotmail recently so I had to reactivate my account - it should work now but could you sent it to my normal address johnsay@locall.aunz.com

cheers
john
 
I meant that I sent my email from a hotmail account. That email addresss you listed was the address I sent it to. Hell, with the recent hotmail problems, you might see my email next month. :)

I really didn't intend this thread to turn into a "breaking the myth's" type of thing, but it looks like it is going that way. I just wanted to poke a little fun at the "trends" that become popular concerning home recording.

It IS unfortuneate that there is not that much good information out there for people to read, and in addition, that there is a LOT of conflicting information. It was the lack of info when I started trying to become an audio engineer that made me just go out and do a LOT of it.

Even good info get's the average Joe just starting out almost nowhere in real life! In the last 6 months, I have dealt with about 5 different "school trained" audio engineers, and not a single one of them had much of a clue about how to achieve decent sound in a recording or for live sound. While they possesed quite a vocabulary of technical terms, they lacked much of the real life experience that makes that knowledge pay off even more. Knowledge without application is dead basically!

I have almost 4000 posts on this BBS. Not all of them are of the "you are a dumbshit" variety by any means. If some of you feel that is all I post, why don't you spend the same time you would spend blasting me in thread on doing a search on my user name on any numbers of topics. Hell, just read them all. I have probably posted something about just about anything concerning recording. ;) I would say most of it is fairly decent stuff.

Peace

Ed
 
RICK FITZPATRICK said:

I read stuff here all the time that refer to Low Frequency Response of things. But no one can really prove how low though. Isn't that odd. I finally found out why. NO UNIVERSITY IN THE WORLD HAS BEEN ABLE TO EVEN MEASURE RESPONSE BELOW 100 khz.

hey Fitzy, that 100 kHz figure is a typo, right???:)
 
hey Fitzy, that 100 kHz figure is a typo, right???

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah, yes, what a fuckwit. 100khz.......hahahahahahahahahahahah Yes, yes, what a zorch I can be sometimes.

Actually, I meant 100 hz, which is not exactly quoting the acoustician who wrote it. I don't remember the exact quote, but he did say that that is the reason manufacturers of things like auralux will not quote specs below 100 hz. Go to yahoo acoustic groups and search just last month for Eric Desart. He is the writer. I should know better than to quote stuff like that cause I ALWAYS FUCK IT UP:rolleyes:

But my point is this. Beware of people telling you of response specs for things below this, He did say, they have a limit to what they have been able to measure, which is not far below 100 hz. How that relates in the real world I do not know. Now I'm sorry I even mentioned it. Me and my big mouth.,
fitz:eek:
 
So what is........

...the best solution for $1000??????????


:D :D :D
 
c7sus said:


Let me know what you think of this little item........

Damn, that looks great. But that would put us up over $1000. :D

--Lee
 
Now kids...

Folks,

Wow, what a load of crap there is flying around. And some good comments too. :)

In order:

Rick:

> NO UNIVERSITY IN THE WORLD HAS BEEN ABLE TO EVEN MEASURE RESPONSE BELOW 100 khz. Maybe Ethan can clarify <

That's not quite true. No acoustics lab is certified to measure below 100 Hz., but that doesn't mean they can't measure below that frequency. The main reason no labs are certified below 100 Hz. is because the certifying organization doesn't recognize or consider lower frequencies! The secondary reason is it requires a very large test room to get accurate results, and that costs too much build because nobody would pay more for tests at frequencies that can't be certified. It's a Catch 22. But I assure you any decent acoustics lab can and does measure frequencies far below 100 Hz. It's just that as the frequency goes lower, confidence in the measurements is reduced. IBM's lab which I use says I can count on readings down to 50 Hz. to at least be in the ball park.

Ed/Sonus:

Wow, where do I start? First, get a grip. Take a deep breath. Then repeat three times out loud, "I don't know everything about audio and music." Just because you have 4000 posts doesn't mean anything more than that you like to spout off a lot.

> I have never heard the difference between bass traps being installed and not. <

Obviously you have not tried real bass traps. Or you didn't pay attention enough to listen for the right things to change. Or by happenstance the room was already pretty good (unlikely). I have yet to see a room that will not benefit greatly from adding bass traps. But they have to be bass traps that work, not the popular nonsense that poses as bass traps.

--Ethan
 
Back
Top