Ok did some more testing. I hooked up my 1010lt left's output to my passive RCA switchers right in on input 1, and the 1010lt right's output to the minimon's rights in, then the minimon right out to the passive switcher right in on input 2. And then the passive switcher to my right speaker. Make any sense? Any way if you follow the signal chain, by selecting input 1 on the passive switcher I am hearing the m-audio through the passive switcher and on to the right speaker, and if I select input 2 I am hearing the m-audio through the minimon to the passive switcher on to the right speaker. I ran stuff through cubase to a mono group, so both of the outputs being used on the m-audio got the same signal. Then I switched between the two signal paths. There is about a 99.984232% match between the two signal paths. Neither one jumping out as being better in anyone category. Needless to say after this test I am confident enough to say, the minimon for a home studio will probably get you buy with out major signal degredation, something that when I bought it, I thought I was assured of that wasn't going to be the case and that is why it wasn't going to be in my main monitoring chain. I am going to have my brother in-law (sound installation installer) give it a listen to tomorrow and see what he thinks and if he can pick out one being better then the other. I know nobody prolly cares about this test, but thought I would share anyway.