"summing" the output of a combo amp to run a cab

  • Thread starter Thread starter amra
  • Start date Start date
amra

amra

Well-known member
I am wondering if you can sum the output of a combo amp, in sort of an external "bridged" mode with some kind of external device to run a single cab?

Can it be done?
 
Would this be for the purpose of a power increase, or blending the characteristics of two amps? :confused:
 
But for the record I'll say that I've never heard of anyone doing it. I don't know if it can be done or not.

If you really want to run two amps into one cab, you could just rewire the cab so that it has two inputs, and dedicate different speakers within the cab to different amps.
 
amra said:
I am wondering if you can sum the output of a combo amp, in sort of an external "bridged" mode with some kind of external device to run a single cab?

Can it be done?
Click to expand...

Nope, sorry. You never want the outputs of two amplifiers to merge. As Zaphod sez, you could wire up a cab so that the separate amps drive separate speakers, but driving the same speaker with two amps will damage both amps and possibly the speaker as well.
 
Sorry guys, I should have been more clear....

The combo amp is 2x35 watts, and I want to combine it's two channels (like a bridge switch would do) to run one cab, instead of the two speakers in it's own cabinet....
 
Not unless it has a bridging function, or a channel blend.

Your combo amp has two discrete 35W power sections?
 
Zaphod B said:
Not unless it has a bridging function, or a channel blend.

Your combo amp has two discrete 35W power sections?
Click to expand...

Not too odd. If it has modelling capabilities or an effects loop it's probably stereo.

Also, I'm not saying this would work, but why wouldn't it? I mean, as long as polarities are matched and impedances are paralleled, the output transformer really wouldn't know the difference, would it?
 
timthetortoise said:
Not too odd. If it has modelling capabilities or an effects loop it's probably stereo.

Also, I'm not saying this would work, but why wouldn't it? I mean, as long as polarities are matched and impedances are paralleled, the output transformer really wouldn't know the difference, would it?
Click to expand...
You go first and let us know how it goes. ;)
 
Thanks for the replies.
Yea, I don't know about the 2 discrete power sections, it does have an effects loop, though. It is an '86 Randall RC-235 with stereo chorus. Pretty nice sounding for a solid state. I am just wishing it was a 70 watt mono, instead of 2x35 watts...
 
If you can get a stereo cab, that would probably be ideal. Same overall output and number of speakers, and you have both a cab that was designed for your stereo output and one that won't fry your amp.
 
Zaphod B said:
You go first and let us know how it goes. ;)
Click to expand...

If I had a combo try it with, I probably would. But the question remains, why wouldn't this work?
 
timthetortoise said:
If I had a combo try it with, I probably would. But the question remains, why wouldn't this work?
Click to expand...
The main reason I can think of is that the output of the amp is looking for an impedance of 4, 8, or 16 ohms. I would imagine that the impedance of the output section itself, viewed as a load of another output section, would not be anywhere in that range, and so you would be paralleling the impedance of two output stages with a speaker. What's the resulting impedance as seen by either output section? Whatever it is, it isn't going to look anything like a speaker to the output section and if it's really low it's going to fry them.
 
Sounds like a) We know it's possible to design for 'brodged vs dual and b) you'd be guessing untill you know how.
 
OK, I had to do a little research to re-familiarize myself with amp output impedances, etc.

The output impedance of amplifiers has to be very low in order to reduce the voltage induced by speaker cone motion. One rule of thumb I'm reading is that the amp's output impedance should be about 1/10 of the speaker load. So for an amp optimized for 8-ohm loads, its output impedance would be less than 1 ohm.

If you wire the outputs of two of those amps together they are going to see a < 1-ohm load and they will likely fry from overcurrent unless they are built like a fucking tank.

That's the way it looks to me, anyway. Maybe someone who works with this stuff more frequently can shed some light.
 
fry'd

years ago i wired 2 amps to one speaker .... bad idea .......... both amps up in smoke the instant i turned on the second amp ....... :(
 
Ok, so you can't just hook them up together. I pretty much figured that would be a bad idea.

I am wondering though, if you could replicate how a mono bridge switch works, but with external components. I mean, it seems to me based on what Zaphod says, that the bridge switch must somehow handle the low impedances somehow when combining two seperate channels. Does anyone know how that works? If you could build an external box that did the same thing, it would be pretty sweet.....
 
amra, I wouldn't think so. A bridging swich has got to effect the signal path in several places within the amp, and I just can't see how an external box could do that.
 
amra said:
Ok, so you can't just hook them up together. I pretty much figured that would be a bad idea.

I am wondering though, if you could replicate how a mono bridge switch works, but with external components. I mean, it seems to me based on what Zaphod says, that the bridge switch must somehow handle the low impedances somehow when combining two seperate channels. Does anyone know how that works? If you could build an external box that did the same thing, it would be pretty sweet.....
Click to expand...

That's a different animal, What bridging does is send a signal to one power amp and its exact inverse to another identical power amp, and then runs the speakers on the positive terminals of the two (reverse polarity) amps, letting the negative terminals float (or ties them together, I'm not sure). It generates a waveform with twice the voltage swing of either power amp alone. It depends on the amps being identical and the input signal being identical but polarity flipped.

It's typically done on solid state PA amps whose outputs are not transformer coupled; I don't know if a transformer coupled output could even do this at all, even if the other conditions could be met, and it's certainly not done to somehow blend the tonal characteristics of two different amplifiers. The upper half of the waveform would be different from the lower, at the very least, and I don't think you'd find that pleasing.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I understand impedance limitations. But let's say you've got 16 ohm outputs with an OT that can handle 4, 8, or 16 ohms, why wouldn't you be able to wire parallel for an 8 ohm load? Does the impedance on the OT depend solely on which set of taps you're using? If so, then I understand why you wouldn't be able to do it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top