I'm in the process of upgrading my soundcard. On advise of a lot of people cruising these forums, the general concensus was that the weak link in my recording setup (aside from considering myself self proclaimed OK musician but an inept recording engineer), was my Soundblaster - Live. Although I though that it was a fairly decent soundcard (and it is for certain applications), it is still a consumer product. I've been looking at (and will be purchasing within a couple of days) a Delta 66 sound card made by MIDIMAN / M Audio, They have a few soundcards available ranging in price from their Audiophile soundcard with I believe the same number of Ins/Outs as the soundblaster, to the Delta 44 with four Ins/Outs, the Delta 66 which is identical to the 44 with an additional S/PDIF In/Out., and they keep on going. Most of the comments I've read from people who went from a consumer soundcard to a Pro Audio soundcard stated that when they used the new card for the first time, the sound quality and reproduction was like night and day. Upon playback, it sounded like you were actually playing the track live, not just playing it back. For a sensitive application like reproducing a nylon stringed classical guitar with it's soft gentle tones (even when strumming, the brilliance of the initial strum is short lived with the nylon), you may need a different soundcard to do your playing justice. Check out the "Computers and Soundcards" thread. I've gotten a boat load of good advise over there. Also check out the post "Is this the clinic for me or do I need the MP3 Intensive Care Unit" in the MP3 Forum. Quite a ways down in the thread is where I finally discovered that my soundcard was the likely culprit for my poor recording/playback quality. Tom.