Mistral said:
You can't ALWAYS trust your ears. Ever hear of fatigue?
What does good sound look like?
If one's ears are fatigued, it's time to take a break and step away from the desk. One should not drive an audio worksatation with fatigued ears anymore than one should drive a car with drowsy eyes. Granted the car is more critical because lives are at stake, but the effect on the quality of the end result is no different.
Spectrum analyzers, to answer the OP question first, are boxes or software that display a graph in real time of volume by frequency. Frequency is laid out on the X axis left-to-right from low frequency to high. The Y axis represents the volume or energy level.
High-end (expensive) spectrum analysis with calibrated microphones that cost more than most of our entire studios do are used regularly in measuring and analyzing room acoustics in preparation for designing the proper acoustic treatment to turn that room into a studio space. They're great for that.
There can sometimes be specific instances where an off-the-rack RTA (real-time analyzer, another term for spectrm analyzer) might help the engineer find a trouble frequency in his music that may be at the ends of the spectrum where the human ear is weak. For example a buildup of LF sub-bass rumble can sometimes manifest itself on a spectral display before one really hears it, but 98 times out of 100 it's a hell of a lot faster and easier just to do it by ear.
This is of course assuming that one's ears are properly trained and conditioned. RDMS may have put it a bit bluntly, but he was absolutely correct. If one needs to to use an analyzer because their eras aren't up to the task, they really need to work ontheir ears more before they work ontheir music.
G.