Sonars biggest letdown: effeciency after mixing or when a quick on-the-fly CD needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter tubedude
  • Start date Start date
tubedude

tubedude

New member
I recently had 3 projects run all over each other, and ended up with around 25 songs to mix at the same time (talk about stressing out).
Now, I love Sonar for the most part. It is solid and does what it does well without getting in my way, but for the occasional error.
But here is what kills me, and wastes TONS of time. Maybe I'm missing something and i hope I am, but if not then this should have been addressed in Sonar 1.
1st.. 25 songs... I get em all mixed where I want them, now I have to bounce them all down. This can be quite time consuming with 20+ tracks and numerous plugs open.
Next, I want to save each song to a .cwb file on a CD.
This sucks and wastes a TON of time becuase I have to save it as a .cwb, then I have to burn the Cd from the location I saved it to (desktop for easy reference) and burning a big ass .cwb takes a few minutes too.
Next, I have to delete the saved .cwb files from desktop and the project files from Sonar, and then go to the recycle bin and toss them.
My suggestion for these gripes: a function that will allow me to choose all the songs in a project (say, 8 songs), and either bounce them all down to a stereo track, a .cwb, or both at the same time while I go watch TV or play guitar or eat or sleep.
Then a fucntion that will allow me to export them all at once to say, a folder on the desktop.

I could save a TON of time if I could pick 10 songs to save as .cwb files and walk away and do whatever else I wanna do.
Instead, I gotta babysit and thats bullshit. Waste of time bullshit and I hate it.
There has got to be a better way. If there is, tell me.

Next gripe: there is no reason in HELL that when I finish a take on the last song of the day, and the band says "can we get a CD real quick so we can plan our next move" that I cant pick the songs I want and burn them as they are FROM Sonar directly onto a Cd without bouncing down and all that crap. Do you know how much it sucks after a 14 hour session to say "well, umm, ok but you'll have to wait 3 minutes per song for me to bounce them down, another minute for me to export it someplace and then another minute for me to get them all into a Cd burning program and get THAT rolling too. 30 minutes at least, unacceptable.
Thats bullshit. The efficiency comes to a standstill and suddenly its all slow going crap, especially when you are wore out and in a bad mood and ready to be done.
I should absolutely without any question be able to open a "burn CD" window from Sonar, drag and drop the files from the cakewalk projects window that I want into the BURN CD window and click BURN and be in business. A rough draft of the songs in their current state, no bouncing, no bullshit, no wasting time. This is not asking too much, this is a simple need that should have been met a long time ago. This is a need, not a want, and I doubt I'm anywhere near the 1st to have this problem.
25 songs is taking me FOREVER to bounce down, then save as a .cwb, then export the actual bounced track elsewhere, then burn a cd from the .cwb, and then mess with all the bounced stereo tracks in ANOTHER program and move them all in seperately, and then render them all AGAIN down to 16 bit with whatever effects I wanted on the whole lot (via Wavelab) and THEN move them to a CD burning program to get THAT done.
Damn. What a pain.

Sonar should do all that shit. At least keep it all native. I should be able to do my "mastering" and burn CD's directly from Sonar. No ifs, ands or buts. I should not need a seperate CD burning software OR Wavelab.
The efficency stops when you are done mixing. Or, when you need a quick on-the-fly copy of a song or a group of songs. God forbid its a whole group of songs. You'll be all damn day.
I'm done.
 
Oh... something else that would be cool from within Sonar...
after I have bounced them all down at the SAME time to stereo tracks and have the all exported to wherever (or to a cool hypothetical place within Sonar) I can open one song, lets say in the non-exisitent stereo editor within sonar, I can set up all the things I want in that editor, lets say an EQ with a little top added, a mastering compressor to get the levels even and a good quality dither, and once I have it where i want it, I can pick whatever bounced songs I want and render them all at the same time, to a seperate file OR printed to the file themself.
rendering them all at the same time.... instead of loading one at a time.
How dreamy fast that would be when I just wanna level the levels a little and dither.
They could all stay in a single folder and I could do whatever from the folder. Lets say the folder is "band1" and I have all the bounced tracks there. Now I open a song in the 2 track editor, get my overall settings, and apply it to folder "band1" and its done.
now, I open the Sonar Cd burner and add "band1" to it and it burnd me a Cd.
How nice.
 
Most of what you're saying is true and it would be nice.
One thing you can skip for less-than-final masters- as you play the song for the last time of the day, record it directly to a cd recorder. That would be no less timely than working in some other mediums.
If you're like me and don't have a stand alone burner..
Set up an output buss just for a mix-track. Bounce the mix to the track(takes about 30-40 seconds once it's set up- which can be part of your templates that you're already using right?;) ), add the eq tweaks, comp, whatever if needed, export it as a 16bit. Chop it off. Skip the other program. (hell i do my masters in ackus)Do it on the final run through of the songs befor you go to the next. All the wav's will be there ready to burn.

Jees, I thought you were going to go on about how much slower mixing in the box is sometimes...:D
Wayne
 
I thought about the outboard thing, but thats expensive and shouldnt even be neccesary, really.

I thought more people would back me up on this stuff. Obviously everyone LIKES to work more than they have to. :mad:
 
Hey - I totally agree - please don't take silence as not caring! ;)

For me, I use Sonar to mix it down, then use Cool Edit Pro with the CD burning plugin to create the CDs. I can convert the sample rate, do any filtering I want to -- even normalize a group of files to the same perceived loudness. Yes, its not anywhere near as convenient as it would be if it were built into Sonar.

Of course, my joyful days are numbered. CEP was bought by Adobe who has decided for now at least that they don't need to bother with CD burning within the program. So, as long as I don't upgrade, I'm fine. ::sigh::

-lee-
 
I'm pretty green when it comes to big projects but I have been recording and mixing about a song and a half every two weeks since May. I have a digital console that I use for 90% of EQ and 60% of compression. I record my mix back into Sonar. I will not explain the routing because it's hardware specific but I have this set up in my standard template that I use for tracking.

When I need a rough mix or final mix the procedure is the same. I set my levels and record the mix either static or automated. I don't have another program for mastering but I have Waves and use those plugs from within sonar. I'll do whatever I need to do on that take and EXPORT it from sonar in whatever format/bit rate I need. From there I move it to where ever it needs to go.

Generally my only client* is a demanding, impatient ass and doesn't deserve or appreciate the hard work I do. The method he puts up with is somewhat tedious but it's the only way I can get the compression and EQ from my outboard gear. Furthermore it's probably not far from how the big boys have to do it aside from having a dedicated CD recorder or DAT to mix to.

Organizing bundles of bundles is beyond the horizon at this point because of my wreckless, irresponsible methods but it will be a problem soon. I am getting better and the stuff I do is less and less like a grade school project so I'll probably want to keep it.

Cheers, RD

*I am my only client at this point.
 
So now I'm curious. How does this stack up with other programs? ProTools? An analog studio...?
Wayne
 
All very valid gripes. I'm not sure how I ever will be able to record and mix 20 songs in 14 hours.

The 1 aspect where you can save lots of time is with your file management and backups. Make sure your Sonar is set to file manegement by project. When starting a large project like this, set your default folder to some new folder on your c drive and create a shortcut from your desktop to this folder. That should take a few seconds. Now, as you create each song, Sonar will automatically save all the songs in a seperate sub-folder in that new folder and save all the audio for each song inside another subfolder of the song's folder called audio. Don't bother to save as cwb files. Just save as normal. You can burn that whole new folder to a CD (or DVD 'cause a CD will be too small for such a large project). Another advantage of this method is that each audio track inside every song is available from the CD to import in any other software package without having to open Sonar if you want to re-use a sample.

Another bit of advice: before starting the project, while you are changing the default project folder, also change the audio folder where Sonar mix down the audio. This will ensure that as you mix down, all the songs are kept in the same folder.

If you are working with many projects at the same time, you can manage these default folder settings by making copies of the .ini files.

For the demo-mastering part I would suggest the following:

Set up a template with all your mastering plug-ins (I use Ozone that mnage mastering pre-sets pretty well) in the main bus. As you master each song you simply have to import audio and export audio.

I have not tried the following myself yet, but this could work: Unfortunately Sonar can not master in batch mode, but you can import all the songs into a single song file, one after the other. Just make sure that each song has a +- 2 seconds lead in silent part. Burn the whole thing doen to one very large file. Some CD burning software has the ability to recognize the silence in between each song.
 
BloodHound said:

If you are working with many projects at the same time, you can manage these default folder settings by making copies of the .ini files.
Can you elaborate on this part. What are you doing here?
Wayne
 
This may sound like a bit of work initially, but it works fine once you got it set up. Sonar stores the deafault pths inside the registry, so first go to registry editor and export the following entry to a file:

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Cakewalk Music Software\SONAR\2.0\UserPaths]

My file called userfiles.reg looks like this
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Cakewalk Music Software\SONAR\2.0\UserPaths]
"WrkFolder"="F:\\MIDI"
"TplFolder"="C:\\PROGRA~1\\Cakewalk\\SONAR2~1\\Sample Content"
"CalFolder"="C:\\PROGRA~1\\Cakewalk\\SONAR2~1\\Sample Content"
"LayoutFolder"="C:\\PROGRA~1\\Cakewalk\\SONAR2~1\\Sample Content"
"WavFileFolder"="F:\\Wave Files"
"VideoFileFolder"="F:\\Video files"
"SysxFileFolder"="C:\\PROGRA~1\\Cakewalk\\SONAR2~1\\Sample Content"
"PlayListFolder"="C:\\PROGRA~1\\Cakewalk\\SONAR2~1\\Sample Content"
"GrooveFolder"="C:\\PROGRA~1\\Cakewalk\\SONAR2~1\\Sample Content"
"PanelFolder"="C:\\PROGRA~1\\Cakewalk\\SONAR2~1\\Sample Content"
"DrumMapFolder"="C:\\PROGRA~1\\Cakewalk\\SONAR2~1\\Drum Maps"
"PatternFolder"="C:\\PROGRA~1\\Cakewalk\\SONAR2~1\\Pattern Brush Patterns"

You can now make many copies of this file, e.g. project1.reg, project2.reg etc.

For each project you specify a different "WrkFolder"="F:\\MIDI" parameter.

Before starting Sonar each time you click on the appropriate @@@@.reg file and the registry will be updated with those parameters. Start Sonar and magically the default folders are set to that project's settings.
 
Wouldn't it be easier to edit the aud.ini file?
 
Crap! The folders aren't listed there... :(

But messing with the registry every time I start Sonar... No, I don't think so. Too much can go wrong...
 
Don't be a sissy!!

That trick is really only for those who can do 20 songs in 14 hours for 3 different projects. Normal people like me would be fine just making the changes in Sonar (just a few clicks more).
 
No band I have ever worked with would ever be able to get 20 songs done in 14 hours...
I'm ususally lucky to get drums, bass and 1 guitar player down for 5 songs in 12 hours. But, thats what pays for more toys. I had over 20 songs to mix at once though, and that sucks bad. I've never had a project start and finish and be done in the same day, maybe even in the same week. Shit always runs over. And when projects run together, thats where Sonars mixdown efficiency and bouncing and all that crap can be way too cumbersome and time consuming.
 
tubedude said:
...Shit always runs over. And when projects run together, thats where Sonars mixdown efficiency and bouncing and all that crap can be way too cumbersome and time consuming.

And again I quietly ask, compared to what? Seriously, I'm asking because the only experience I have to compare to is analog mixing to dat. My biggest need in this regard is trying to find ways to cut the moves in the mix and setup process. So many moves and clicks to fill in. Otherwise, I'm frikin' ecstatic.:cool:

"I'm ususally lucky to get drums, bass and 1 guitar player down for 5 songs in 12 hours. But, thats what pays for more toys. "

Sounds about right.:D
Wayne
 
mixsit said:
And again I quietly ask, compared to what?


Well, as compared to how easy it would be to click, umm "burn on-the-fly" open a window, pick the songs you want to burn a quick copy of and press OK.

As compared to bouncing down 10 songs seperately and then saving 10 songs seperately as bundle files. I should be able to open a box, pick the ones I want, and walk away and let it work. Right now to bounce 10 song, export the stereo track, and save as cwb it takes me 3 times as long as it should or could, which can be up to 2 hours. Thats just stupid to me. Too much work, I cant just sit for 2 hours watching that blue line say 45%, 50% 60% over and over. I could get things done while it does its own thing.
I should also be able to burn CD's from my main app, which is exactly what it is for in the long run, am I correct? No reason it doesnt ahve that and a stereo editor either. Its just not effiecnt aAFTER you have mixed or want a quick CD of a song. Its just not and it COULD be so much more. THAT would be worth an upgrade cost by itself, and be a truly USEFUL add on, not some shit just to call a feature.
I'm not asking for too much here, and people should be blowing cakewalks email doors off for features like this. I guess I'm the only one that wants to get done faster and thats ok I guess. I just dont understand it.
Peace!
 
Part of the question was, is anyone doing this? Protools, Logic? Or is sonar behind in this regard?
Wayne
 
Tubedude has some very legitimate gripes here, and I agree completely. A "batch bundle" scenario would be awesome, and so would a "quick burn" function.
Right now, I just keep a cassette deck handy for "quick burns". I just don't have the patience to go through the 30 minute process to burn a couple songs to CD.

I don't know if ProTools or other programs do this now or not, but to me it's irrelevant; SONAR should.

Everybody works differently, and a lot of what SONAR does will never get used by some people, and used everyday by others. I understand that. The two features we're talking about here are pretty universally beneficial and should be at the top of the list...

Aaron
www.voodoovibe.com
 
Aaron Cheney said:
Tubedude has some very legitimate gripes here, and I agree completely. A "batch bundle" scenario would be awesome, and so would a "quick burn" function.
Right now, I just keep a cassette deck handy for "quick burns". I just don't have the patience to go through the 30 minute process to burn a couple songs to CD.

I don't know if ProTools or other programs do this now or not, but to me it's irrelevant; SONAR should.

Everybody works differently, and a lot of what SONAR does will never get used by some people, and used everyday by others. I understand that. The two features we're talking about here are pretty universally beneficial and should be at the top of the list...

Aaron
www.voodoovibe.com


Amen Brother. For some insane reason, not everyone agrees. Why not have an app that takes us from start to finish and leaves us in need of nothing? Makes sense to me, at least.
 
tubedude said:
Amen Brother. For some insane reason, not everyone agrees. Why not have an app that takes us from start to finish and leaves us in need of nothing? Makes sense to me, at least.

Gee I hope you don't include me in that remark!:D Although it is odd this subject hasn't generated more intrest. Maybe sometimes it takes a while to get the wheels turning.
Wayne
 
Back
Top