Sonar 5 V-Vocal Vs. Antares Autotune

[studiomaster]

Which one do you prefer?

Personally, I don't even know how to work Autotune properly!
But i can use the V-Vocal...maybe one of you who is an Autotune user can help me out..please?

 

[punkin]

It's been my experience that autotuners only work at "tuning" with very minor out of tune problems. They just sound too fake if you have to do much processing. On the other hand, if you lean on them real hard, they give up a kind of cool effect but it only works if it fits the style of music.

I stay away from them myself.

 

[BAP]

I have elastic audio [Samplitude], V-vocal and an old version of Autotune.

I tend to use none of them... out of tune-ness has a charm of it's own!

 

[Myriad_Rocker]

V-vocal and an old version of Autotune.

How mis-informed you are...

 

[Ford Van]

It isn't even close. V-Vocal smokes the older versions of Autotune.

I haven't used the latest AT yet, so I cannot say if it can compete.

Really, Melodyne is probably the best product on the market for "fixing" stuff.

Some of these responses appear to be from people that are afraid to try the products! When I make a trip down the the MP3 Clinic here, it certainly sounds like there should be a LOT of pitch correction users here!

 

[Melsi]

i use both of them but only for light fixes, and from my experiance with them i much prefer auto tune, its great to fix up minor problems.

Also ive used auto tune to make an electric voice effect which sounds pretty cool, if you turn the retune button all the way to fast, and then turn the tracking button all the way to relaxed and hit improved targetting and add a sine wave vibrato, gives nice effect.

but by far the best auto tuner, is a SINGING TEACHER hehe.

 

[IainDearg]

Celemony Melodyne Uno for vocals.