Something Dig Heads cant do

[RCATechnician]

I don't know if all of the Disk and Dig heads realize, that when you record a session on analog tape, and take the tape and sit in on the floor. After roughly a day, the earth's magnetic pull will allign the phase of everything on the tape. The difference is night and day! then drop it to disk. but after using hard drive based systems lately. I find that latency is making for alot of phase problems. If anyone has a formula to figure out how to move tracks to make up for latency, please post it
thanks

RCA technician

 

[Beck]

Location: Was Nashville, Then Minneapolis, Then London, Then Atlanta, The Savannah, Now SouthWest Georgia, Soon to be San Jose Costa Rica.

More power to ya, but it's just a matter of time before he catches up.

 

[Dr ZEE]

it's just a matter of time before he catches up.

heh heh
My first thought actually was it has to be She.

 

[Track Rat]

I use an Ionic Breese to re-ionize the ions. These re-polarizes the the phase-locked-loop chroma delay to reasonable latency (well within the range of plate techtonics at least). Hope this helps. YMMV.

 

[The Ghost of FM]

At last! An easy question.

Gyrokinetic simulations of a DIII-D L-mode discharge, using GYRO, are able to simultaneously reproduce experimentally measured ion and electron heat diffusivities as well as the root-mean-square (RMS) density fluctuation levels measured by beam emission spectroscopy (BES) at mid-radius (ρ = 0.5). Synthetic BES signals, which account for the finite wavenumber sensitivity of the volume-sampling measurement, are generated from GYRO to perform quantitative comparisons with the experimental signals. In contrast, local simulations of the outer core (ρ = 0.75) are found to under predict the ion and electron heat fluxes by a factor 4. The synthetic RMS density fluctuations at this location are less than half the level measured by BES. Additional comparisons of frequency spectra and correlation lengths, as well as to Te fluctuations obtained by the new correlation electron cyclotron emission (CECE) diagnostic are underway.

Cheers!

 

[Track Rat]

I suppose you could do it that way if you had to.

 

[dementedchord]

Gyrokinetic simulations of a DIII-D L-mode discharge, using GYRO, are able to simultaneously reproduce experimentally measured ion and electron heat diffusivities as well as the root-mean-square (RMS) density fluctuation levels measured by beam emission spectroscopy (BES) at mid-radius (ρ = 0.5). Synthetic BES signals, which account for the finite wavenumber sensitivity of the volume-sampling measurement, are generated from GYRO to perform quantitative comparisons with the experimental signals. In contrast, local simulations of the outer core (ρ = 0.75) are found to under predict the ion and electron heat fluxes by a factor 4. The synthetic RMS density fluctuations at this location are less than half the level measured by BES. Additional comparisons of frequency spectra and correlation lengths, as well as to Te fluctuations obtained by the new correlation electron cyclotron emission (CECE) diagnostic are underway.

Cheers!

HEY!!! i was gonna say that....

 

[Beck]

Gyrokinetic simulations of a DIII-D L-mode discharge, using GYRO, are able to simultaneously reproduce experimentally measured ion and electron heat diffusivities as well as the root-mean-square (RMS) density fluctuation levels measured by beam emission spectroscopy (BES) at mid-radius (ρ = 0.5). Synthetic BES signals, which account for the finite wavenumber sensitivity of the volume-sampling measurement, are generated from GYRO to perform quantitative comparisons with the experimental signals. In contrast, local simulations of the outer core (ρ = 0.75) are found to under predict the ion and electron heat fluxes by a factor 4. The synthetic RMS density fluctuations at this location are less than half the level measured by BES. Additional comparisons of frequency spectra and correlation lengths, as well as to Te fluctuations obtained by the new correlation electron cyclotron emission (CECE) diagnostic are underway.

Cheers!

Yeah me too, but I screwed up. When I rubbed the balloon on my head and tried to stick it on the wall to impress my kids it wouldn’t stay. It would stick to the lampshade but not the wall.

Then I realized I had factored p = 0.075 instead of 0.75 as Jeff rightly called it. I know, I know… what the hell was I thinkin’?

 

[FALKEN]

not latency errors, but timing errors nonetheless. with 44,100 samples per second, I would have to bet that not every sample taken is at the exact correct moment in time. I doubt the clocks/converters are really accurate to 1/40,000 th of a second.