some help on chosing a mixer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter guhlenn
  • Start date Start date
Guhlenn....


well, it kinda depends what you're using it for. You cant really ask if a digital desk is better than an analogue cus it depends what you're using it for and depends what desk you're comparing.

With my studio, in my main Studio A, i have an analog / digital desk setup. I have a Neve console as the analog desk, and also 2 Mackie D8B's to mix with. Then in my dance studio, i have another two Mackie D8b's cus with dance music, digital is better FOR ME cus i can run automation and it's all digital, etc.

some bands who come into the big studio here (studio a) tend to like to use analog mixing cus a)its a neve so the quality of it is excellent, and also they're scared of digital.

if yuo're using synths and loads of sound modules, then try the digital desk, cus you can keep stuff in the digital domain and you can benefit from desk automation (i.e. the faders, pans, etc all moving automatically). digital desks such as the D8b have compressors built in as plug ins, eqs, amp sims, loads of modulation and with my D8b's, i have auto tune pitch correcting on every channel. with digital desks, you can use the onboard compressors if you run out of a compressor or something drastic like that. most analog desks dont have fx/compressors.

even for bands, it may be god to get an automated desk, it's so much easier. even my neve analogue desk is automated. it means if you need to turn your lexicon up, your Focusrite compressor down all at the same time, you can get it to do it automatically. automation is also really handy if you need to remix the song at a later stage.

if you're thinking of getting a mixer, why not spend a little more...have a look at the yamaha AW4416 (i htink thats what its called), it has a digital desk (with technology from the Yamaha O2R), and a 16 track digital recorder.
 
thanks,

i haven't looked at digital mixing because when i first started reading here i read somewhere that digital mixers suck so i didn't bother anymore...

Well, i'm thinking, the price seems more then reasonable and i guess that it cuts down on compatibility issues and noise because of incorrect use of different parts.

I am thinking together a studio with at least 8 simultaneous analog (preamped) channels to record, and a little more channels just to not be stuck with 8 channels. All the yamamha studff that's affordable is 20-bit though and i feel i'm biting myself in the ass when buying such.

My analog option wuld be something like the spirit SX20 with 16 preamps. and a cheap 24/96 soundcard (well, cheap...;)). so what would yield better results when thinking of rock/metal do you think?

Thansk for the trouble,
Guhlenn:)
 
my $.25.... just in case you're not ready to blow a gajillion bucks.

Cheap and good= a Tascam tmd-1000 a SoundScape Mixtreme. less than $1000.

The Mixtreme is a 16 ch TDIF card.. and it totally ROCKs. its 24/96.. and has a buil in v-mixer as well as effects options running on its own chip.

The Tascam isnt the BEST mixer in the world, but it would have 8 ins (all pre-amped.. but only 4 with phantom pwr..) and it really sounds good to me. Way better than my Mackie or my Behringer. And you can always Upgrade later. New mixer.. or expand it to 16ch... whatever. Oh, and the INPUTS are 20-bit, but OUTPUT is 24-bit.. so all the onboard DSP has some headroom. Its only 48k, tho.

Id Definately stick with the Mixtreme, though. Its great. http://www.soundscape-digital.com .

xoxo
 
i thought it only had 4 pre's.

you mean the package costs $1K? that's not too much. Sounds better then what MAckie? and maybe i'm wrong but the A/D is 20 bit and out is 24 bit but it's a digital mixer????

i don't get that.

still sounds interresting enough...

thanks,

guhlenn

ps. is having 20 bit and 105db headroom any different from 24 bit and 105 db headroom? maybe a stupid question but i don't know.
 
Back
Top