Chris Fallen
New member
Everyone has had time to play around with it by now (except poor fools like me who can't afford it right now).
How does everybody like it?
How does everybody like it?
And poor fools like me whose computer system is below the required specs for running 3.0.Chris Fallen said:(except poor fools like me who can't afford it right now).
kylen said:
The new interface is growing on me and I'm beginning to appreciate it better - I've already 'swiped' away 3 tracks by mistake somehow (and it wasn't undoable) so it is really powerful !
kylen
Dr_simon said:I got off to a bit of a bumpy start.
With Sonar 3 I notice my system (1.8Ghz/256 mb RAM) is becoming a problem. Sonar 2 handles 12 tracks @ 24 bit no problem. Sonar 3 is dropout city. I had to dither down to 16 bit to get it all working.
Time for a faster processor I think !
Paa more expense !!
pdlstl said:Are y'all saying that the undo function under the Edit menu doesn't work for that?
It's always brought back tracks which I've mistakenly deleted.
????
Earl
Chris Fallen[/i] [B](except poor fools like me who can't afford it right now).[/B] [/QUOTE] [QUOTE][i]Originally posted by dachay2tnr said:And poor fools like me whose computer system is below the required specs for running 3.0.
I have one suggestion:Dr_simon said:With Sonar 3 I notice my system (1.8Ghz/256 mb RAM) is becoming a problem.