S
sbcgroup2
New member
re:
Uh-oh...
Uh-oh...

Personally, I like the original better.chessrock said:Just imagine the post, as it is. Only with a bunch of f-bombs in there for accent ... along with a few "you guys are bunch of idiots" comments thrown in ... just for good measure.
.
chessrock said:Just imagine the post, as it is. Only with a bunch of f-bombs in there for accent ... along with a few "you guys are bunch of idiots" comments thrown in ... just for good measure.
.
I'm hoping this is a typo or a simple misunderstanding, considering most vox sibilance occurs somewhere in the 4kHz - 9kHz range (give or take a kHz amongst friendssbcgroup2 said:How about just dipping some eq frequencies? (I usually drop out the ~1k range when de-essing vox).
SouthSIDE Glen said:I'm hoping this is a typo or a simple misunderstanding, considering most vox sibilance occurs somewhere in the 4kHz - 9kHz range (give or take a kHz amongst friends).
G.
littledog said:It would certainly have been interesting to watch an engineer try and tell Jerry Lee Lewis - "don't hit the piano so hard, and it will sound better."
But I wouldn't want to be the one to try and do it.
littledog said:But at the price point for a pair of Royers, you have LOTS of options - 414's and Josephson C42's come to mind as a starting point. But anything in that price range will sound SO different than your C1000's, you'll have a hard time believing it!
Don't believe everything you read. "s" and "p" are not in the 1k range. Like Glen said, ESS-ing is alot higher than that.sbcgroup2 said:I read somewhere to drop out the 1k range and it seems to do the trick for me. I adjust my eq frequencies in that range until the "s" and "p"s are tamed.
I'm not judging your recordings because I've never heard them. But I guarantee you that if you keep learning and improving, you'll listen back to what you think was good in a year from now and say "I can't believe I used to like my recordings". Nobody's trying to make you sound like an idiot.jeez...you guys are all makin' me sound like such an idiot...granted I'm an amateur, but i like my recordings...i really do!!![]()
RAMI said:Don't believe everything you read. "s" and "p" are not in the 1k range. Like Glen said, ESS-ing is alot higher than that.
I'm not judging your recordings because I've never heard them. But I guarantee you that if you keep learning and improving, you'll listen back to what you think was good in a year from now and say "I can't believe I used to like my recordings". Nobody's trying to make you sound like an idiot.
That didn't and wouldn't happen because JLL actually knew what he was doing. But when some mook walks into the studio with daddy's credit card and more drums in his kit than years of experience actually playing them, you're damn right the experienced engineer is going to "save him from himself".littledog said:It would certainly have been interesting to watch an engineer try and tell Jerry Lee Lewis - "don't hit the piano so hard, and it will sound better."
NL5 said:I briefly read thru the thread, so I apologize if this has been said, but to minimize the hi-hat, you really need to be aware of the mic's pattern and placement. I get very little bleed from the hats in my snare tracks....
HangDawg said:I have to agree. I did so well placing the snare mic last time I recorded drums, I needed a mic on the hats. First time for everything I guess.
littledog said:You had too little HH in your overheads? You should write a book on how you did it - it would be a best seller!![]()
littledog said:I happen to use the C42's almost exclusively as overheads .