B
boingoman
New member
juststartingout said:As to the original qusetion, the biggest difference between the single, duel and tri is the number of channels.
Actually that is not the case.
In a sense, since they all sound kinda the same, you are sort of right. And actually come closer to anwering the original question than I did. The only exception is the single, with only a diode rectifier. It is not as varied, tonally.
The sonic differences they do have come from different power levels and gain stage designs, and rectifier options.
But the original idea behind the single/dual/triple is the number of rectifiers/rectifier tubes, not number of channels.
Sorry if I didn't make that clear in my other post, the technical vs. sonic aspects.
The single uses one diode rectifier. It currently has two channels. This is the odd man out, as it does not offer the tube rectifier option. Pure diode rectifier rawk!
The dual uses two rectifier tubes, one for each pair of output tubes. It currently has three channels.
The triple uses three rectifier tubes, one for each set of output tubes. It also has three channels.
The concept is that the multiple rectifier tubes keep some of the warmth and compression of tube rectifiers, while not letting the amp sag at high power levels.
Since the dual and triple also offer the diode option, they could be called the triple and the quad.
The spongy/bold switch is essentially a built-in variac, which starves the amp for voltage in spongy mode, browning up the sound ala EVH. It has a different sound, as Marshalls and Mesas sound different, but the idea is the same.
Dogfood, you posted about a reverb/tremolo model. That was the Trem-O-Verb, the best sounding Rectifier amp they made, IMO.
Last edited: