TheRockDoc said:I have a nice Martin, and old Yairi, and a $129 Fender. I use the Fender mostly to do open tunings as such. I have recorded with all three, and the Fender holds it own for its value and purpose...
I think you could get alot more for the money if you were in the $150-$195. At such a low price, you'll get so little value for the money that it will actually cost more for you to have it. Make sure that you include at least $25-$50 for getting it set up, and make sure that you are in a humidifier. Those two alone will help get your $175 Ibanez to actually be workable.
Wait another 1-2 months and save just a little more money- you'll be glad that you did.
$175= "This one is pretty good. It sounds OK and it definitely does the job."
$100= "I hate this piece of crap- please put some kerosene on it an blow it up."
Know what I mean?
scrubs said:I don't have a very high opinion of the Sigma guitars that I've played. I really wanted to like them when they first came out, because I thought I could get a cheaper guitar that was Martin-esque. However, the workmanship was terrible and the sound didn't really impress me either. I've had much better luck with inexpensive Fender and Yamaha acoustics. YMMV.
gordone said:hmmmm, You're not going to get much of an acoustic for $100. Do you play acoustic? Do you want one to keep at the studio so a band can use it? I think any band/performer worth anything would already have their own acoustic(s) already. I know I would want to bring one of my own acoustics to record anywhere.
Now if you can up that budget to $400 (preferably $700) you can get a pretty decent acoustic that will be fairly versatile and not suck. Larrivee is (again IMNSHO) the best bang for the buck in acoustics right now. There -03 series are well under a grand and are constructed of the same materials as their more expensive higher-end models.
For fair disclosure, I own a bunch of acoustics from the Larrivee OM03R (<$800) to a Santa Cruz OM/PW (~$2500). Every sub $500 guitar I've played at Sam Ash/Guitar Center sucked real bad...
They're a mixed bag, imo. The cheapo DG-7/DG-8 models are not my personal favorite, but if you take the time to pick out a good one, and get it set-up properly, it should serve you well until you can afford something better. The DG-9 was a nice inexpensive guitar, but they didn't make it for very long. IIRC, the DG-14 was pretty good. My main acoustic is a Fender JG-26SCE electric/acoustic, which I absolutely love.msblaze said:so fender is decent eh?
scrubs said:They're a mixed bag, imo. The cheapo DG-7/DG-8 models are not my personal favorite, but if you take the time to pick out a good one, and get it set-up properly, it should serve you well until you can afford something better. The DG-9 was a nice inexpensive guitar, but they didn't make it for very long. IIRC, the DG-14 was pretty good. My main acoustic is a Fender JG-26SCE electric/acoustic, which I absolutely love.