U
UtahBites
New member
Greetings,
I was hoping to draw on the kick @$$ experience of this site, as I’m having some problems effectively setting up a second IDE drive to work efficiently (with Cakewalk 9, anyway).
Win 98se is installed on my C: drive, as is Cakewalk. I am using CW exclusively for mixing (importing 44.1khz wav files from a vs1680) and some of our songs have up 40 tracks PER SONG, so the more tracks I can play, the better! I bought a 40GB Ibm drive (7200 rpm) thinking that it would improve efficiency, since it would not be utilized by anything except CW9. (side note: unfortunately, my BIOS limits the effective drive size to 33 GB, but that’s another issue IBM’s website and utilities were unable to resolve, and I don’t DARE to Flash my BIOS, as I’ve never tried that before!!)
I’ve tried to change all the “temp” files directory in Cakewalk to the D: drive, but can’t get anywhere near as many tracks to playback as I can on the C: drive (?). I suspect the BIOS issue as the problem area, but yet…I am able to copy/paste/swap files between drives in other programs PLUS, I’ve ran some diagnostic software to compare both drives' performances, and can’t see any red flags.
…So how are YOUR dual IDE drives configured w/Cakewalk??
Would I benefit to install Cakewalk on the d: drive, instead of c:?
Thanks to all…I trust in you more than the computer places around here to help me out w/this!
FWIW, Here is my setup:
Duron 700mhz (not overclocked)
Epox 8kta2 (via kt133) award 4.5 BIOS (ata100)
3 x 128MB RAM (pc133)
Win98se
WD 20GB primary c: drive on IDE 1 (ata 100, 7200 rpm)
IBM 40GB secondary d: drive on IDE 1 (ata 100, IDE, 7200 rpm)
CD-rom, primary on IDE 2
CD-burner secondary on IDE2
Soundblaster 128 PCI
Geforce2mx video (32 mb)
PS …With my i/o setting at 512, I can play up to 15 tracks simultaneously…and at 1024, can playback around 25 tracks…so far. Does anyone have a setting HIGHER than 1024?!??
Thanks in Advance!!!!
I was hoping to draw on the kick @$$ experience of this site, as I’m having some problems effectively setting up a second IDE drive to work efficiently (with Cakewalk 9, anyway).
Win 98se is installed on my C: drive, as is Cakewalk. I am using CW exclusively for mixing (importing 44.1khz wav files from a vs1680) and some of our songs have up 40 tracks PER SONG, so the more tracks I can play, the better! I bought a 40GB Ibm drive (7200 rpm) thinking that it would improve efficiency, since it would not be utilized by anything except CW9. (side note: unfortunately, my BIOS limits the effective drive size to 33 GB, but that’s another issue IBM’s website and utilities were unable to resolve, and I don’t DARE to Flash my BIOS, as I’ve never tried that before!!)
I’ve tried to change all the “temp” files directory in Cakewalk to the D: drive, but can’t get anywhere near as many tracks to playback as I can on the C: drive (?). I suspect the BIOS issue as the problem area, but yet…I am able to copy/paste/swap files between drives in other programs PLUS, I’ve ran some diagnostic software to compare both drives' performances, and can’t see any red flags.
…So how are YOUR dual IDE drives configured w/Cakewalk??
Would I benefit to install Cakewalk on the d: drive, instead of c:?
Thanks to all…I trust in you more than the computer places around here to help me out w/this!
FWIW, Here is my setup:
Duron 700mhz (not overclocked)
Epox 8kta2 (via kt133) award 4.5 BIOS (ata100)
3 x 128MB RAM (pc133)
Win98se
WD 20GB primary c: drive on IDE 1 (ata 100, 7200 rpm)
IBM 40GB secondary d: drive on IDE 1 (ata 100, IDE, 7200 rpm)
CD-rom, primary on IDE 2
CD-burner secondary on IDE2
Soundblaster 128 PCI
Geforce2mx video (32 mb)
PS …With my i/o setting at 512, I can play up to 15 tracks simultaneously…and at 1024, can playback around 25 tracks…so far. Does anyone have a setting HIGHER than 1024?!??

Thanks in Advance!!!!