G
ggunn
Crystal Flavolian
Weighing in late, here, but I have a hypothosys.
[...]
Just a hypothysis-
Hypothesis.

Weighing in late, here, but I have a hypothosys.
[...]
Just a hypothysis-
It's true - the back and sides aren't made of wood. They are made of something not too different from Formica.
Always glad to see the spelling police on patrol...
A gloss finish cut back to give a matt finish is just that. After an indeterminate amount of time through use you will have a part gloss, part flat finish depending on the hardness of the finish and the amount of wear.
Aw, lighten up, OK?
True, but I rather dislike adding flatteners as they make the finish less hard. I'd much rather just rub it out matte - it's easier to make that matte again too.
Oh, and by the way, if we want to go back to the first guitar I finished, add 20+ years to the experience thing - though if we only want to include professional experience I guess we'd have to subtract a couple years. Oh, and my dad agrees, and he finished his first guitar 40 years ago, so I'm pretty sure we have over 100 experience saying that sales guy is full of shit.
Light
"Cowards can never be moral."
M.K. Gandhi
It was meant as a joke response to your... joke response.
Resonance is the only reason why light satin finishes are applied to Martin acoustics, (or any other acoustic guitar)...![]()
One guy somewhat famously made the sides of a guitar out of PAPER MACHE', just to prove that the sides of an acoustic guitar have nothing to do with the guitar's tone. I've seen documentation, but do not recall who it was.
Fred Carlson. It's not QUITE paper maché (I don't remember the exact difference - he explained it to me once), but then he makes rather, um, odd guitars to begin with. Definitely NOT a traditional "Martinish" style of guitar.
Nice guy, though.
Light
"Cowards can never be moral."
M.K. Gandhi
In any event that discussion is way beyond the realms of this thread.![]()
heh. funny, b/c my friend gary and i both thought that was pretty likely (that he was full of it). he generally exuded an arrogance that belied his position as a salesman (although he's also the repair/lesson guy).
for instance, gary picked up one guitar and the guy said, "why don't you just put that back?" i guess he assumed it was out of our price range.
then, when gary asked to play a d-hole git, the guy said, "what do you want to play THAT one for? it's the worst one in here!"
on top of all that, while trying to audition various acoustics, he insisted on yakking incessantly over top of our playing, making any critical, comprehensive assessment impossible. and then, when i was playing one that i really loved, he took it from me and proceeded to strum out chords as hard as he could to demonstrate its projection, as if i couldn't properly test it myself per my own playing style. when gary put his hands out to take the git from him and said, "may i?" the dude held onto it and yakked for about 5 more minutes before reluctantly relenquishing it to him.
i'd say that all told, we spent 2 hours in the shop and a maximum of 10 minutes playing.
yeesh what a piece of work.![]()