
noisewreck
New member
I was reading kunalkho's post, and a question popped in my head.
I have some sample libraries that I have purchased. One of them is from Ubershall. To my dismay it turned out to be one of those "construction kits", although there is some stuff that I can use (no, I don't use an entire loop, before anyone jumps and starts another analog vs digital type argument here)...
What bothers me about this particular sample CD is that all the tracks are individually compressed and limited. I mean LIMITED to hell! The drum parts have all their peaks chopped. It's a mess.
So, my question is why do some of those companies releasing sample libraries do stuff like this? What's the logic behind it? Why purposly diminish the flexibility of their product?
Just wondering, maybe discuss the merits (if any) of such approach.
Ok, just felt like bitching about what's wrong with today's digital world, fractured bass on mp3s and pixellated high-ends on you toob
I have some sample libraries that I have purchased. One of them is from Ubershall. To my dismay it turned out to be one of those "construction kits", although there is some stuff that I can use (no, I don't use an entire loop, before anyone jumps and starts another analog vs digital type argument here)...
What bothers me about this particular sample CD is that all the tracks are individually compressed and limited. I mean LIMITED to hell! The drum parts have all their peaks chopped. It's a mess.
So, my question is why do some of those companies releasing sample libraries do stuff like this? What's the logic behind it? Why purposly diminish the flexibility of their product?
Just wondering, maybe discuss the merits (if any) of such approach.
Ok, just felt like bitching about what's wrong with today's digital world, fractured bass on mp3s and pixellated high-ends on you toob
