Rules of thumb for EQing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saltine
  • Start date Start date
Besides, I don't know what you and NYM are complaining about. You guys should be glad that me and my over-opinionated ass of a self stay out of there and leave you guys alone. There's in fact a whole boatload of forums on this BBS that I do not frequent. Among many other reasons, I just don't have the time. That should make you guys very happy.

G.
'I just don't have the time' is a great reason for not using the clinic. I just thought that the reason you put forth "Who am I to tell someone what I think they should do with their mix, if they don't even know themselves what they want?" as a reason not to use the clinic was well, sorta lame.

Telling someone what you think they should do with their mix is exactly what the clinic is for. If everyone felt the way you suggest would we even have a clinic?

All kidding aside, you have alot of great skills that would benefit us just as much if not more in the clinic as in this forum. I don't spend enough time there myself but I'd actually be happier if you'd be there to critique anything I put up there.
 
All kidding aside, you have alot of great skills that would benefit us just as much if not more in the clinic as in this forum. I don't spend enough time there myself but I'd actually be happier if you'd be there to critique anything I put up there.

+1

The clinic is all about having a second set of ears. Experienced ears are preferred. ;)
 
That's just me being dense again. I don't know why I try to make a simple thing more difficult than it is. I guess when I see a guy getting paid big bucks to do something, I assume there's a lot more to it than meets the eye. Or ear, in this case. :D
But... It's not a simple thing. It is difficult. And there is way more to it than meets the eye.

On the surface, the mechanics are very simple. Turn knob and listen. Underneath, the guy turning the knob has built a mental model out of sound and is shaping it, turning it, pushing it, pulling it, hammering it... Adjusting an EQ is not an isolated incident. It is rarely ever "EQ this track and move on". The "action" that the mixing engineer desires might be done with an EQ on this track, a fader move on that track, and a reverb on the other track. Each of the three would be useless on its own, but work together as one "mix move".

Learn to "see" the sound as a three dimensional object. Learn to mold the sound like clay. All of this goes on "under the hood". It takes a looooooong time and a ton of practice to wire your brain to work that way.



In short, save the technical knowledge for programming synths and sequencers, right? Got it. :D
You don't quite have it... It's not a case of "save the technical knowledge for...". You use all of your technical knowledge at all times. The more of it you have, the faster you can work and the less you get hung up. It's just that the technical knowledge itself is such a minuscule part of what is going on.
 
Underneath, the guy turning the knob has built a mental model out of sound.... Learn to "see" the sound as a three dimensional object.

Building mental models is actually something I'm pretty good at, as it's a major part of object-oriented programming. Most of my work is done away from the computer - thinking of how to organize the data, what operations an object should perform, what their dependencies and interactions with other objects should be, etc. Maybe there's hope for me yet! :D
 
'I just don't have the time' is a great reason for not using the clinic. I just thought that the reason you put forth "Who am I to tell someone what I think they should do with their mix, if they don't even know themselves what they want?" as a reason not to use the clinic was well, sorta lame.
Well, you're entitled to your opinion on that, of course. But for me, and I'm being completely honest here, what you within your rights consider "lame" is something I believe actually drives right to the heart of this whole thing. If one doesn't know what they want from a recording and needs to get someone else's opinion on that, then I have no idea why they are even there to begin with. It just doesn't make any sense to my little ol' monkey brain. It's like someone picking up a guitar with the expressed purpose of playing a song, but having no idea of what song they want to play or what key they want to play it in. If you don't have that already figured out, then put down the guitar until you do.

Again, if they know what they want, but just need help in learning the techniques involved in achieving that, that's fine by me, which is why I even come to this BBS to begin with.

But if someone comes along - which happens all the time - and asks whether they should hard pan their guitars or throw reverb on the lead vocal or make the floor tom louder or whatever, because they want my opinion of what would sound better, I don't know how to honestly answer that other than to ask them in return, "What do YOU want?" Because, frankly, IMHO, if they don't know the answer to that themselves, then they are stepping in front of their DAW or mixer waaaay too early. Which in my banana-loving mind is the most important of all points above all others, and not a "lame" idea at all. But that's just my IMHO. Sorry if you see that as just being opinionated, but it's what I believe.

And BTW, the thing about not having enough time referred to the reason I am not on a whole multitude of forums. The three that I do regularly visit (recording, mixing and mastering) are the ones that I feel I can both learn the most from and contribute the most to, and take up too much of my time as it is. I've given my reasons for not frequenting the clinic and why I feel that burning even more time away by adding that to my list of forums is not a good idea.
Telling someone what you think they should do with their mix is exactly what the clinic is for. If everyone felt the way you suggest would we even have a clinic?
No, which is my point exactly. I don't buy into the need for it.

You have the right to disagree, and perhaps you and legion and a hundred others find it useful. More power to you. I don't tell you not to go there and I'm not doing that now. I'm just saying that for me and my way of thinking about the whole thing it just doesn't make a whole lot of sense, so I don't regularly participate. Do you really want to begrudge me my honest feelings on that?

That's not to say that I have never done and will never do it again. There have been times here where I have helped a few individuals in that way. But frankly, I don't believe I am doing them a whole lot of favors by doing that. They think I am, of course, and in that way I am happy to make them temporarily happy; but I'd rather them be mad at me if it means a better chance for their longer term happiness by learning that they need to have the will and the self-confidence to figure out for themselves what they want to hear and not to just have them do something because I or someone else thought it sounded OK.
All kidding aside, you have alot of great skills that would benefit us just as much if not more in the clinic as in this forum. I don't spend enough time there myself but I'd actually be happier if you'd be there to critique anything I put up there.
Well, I thank you kindly for saying that, I do appreciate that as a compliment.

I have no problem producing and mixing or other people, that's what I do, and I'd like to think that I'm not awful at it. But there's a difference between that and telling someone else what to produce and mix, even if they ask for it. If you're going to mix, mix. If you're going to produce, produce. If you want me to do it instead, I will, just step aside. If you know what you want to do, but need help in learning the technique of how to get it done, I'll help if it's something I know. But if you just want to know WHAT to do, I'm really not all that interested in telling you what to to do. I figure that's your own personal domain, not mine or anyone else's.

G.
 
Last edited:
Hey...this thread is still going strong. :)


So I thought about it, and I think I have the only two rules of thumb for EQing that anyone has to follow.

1. Choose the frequency.
2. Cut or boost as needed.



:D
 
Hey...this thread is still going strong. :)


So I thought about it, and I think I have the only two rules of thumb for EQing that anyone has to follow.

1. Choose the frequency.
2. Cut or boost as needed.
:D

So no one has brought up parallel EQing yet? :D








:cool:
 
That's just me being dense again. I don't know why I try to make a simple thing more difficult than it is. I guess when I see a guy getting paid big bucks to do something, I assume there's a lot more to it than meets the eye. Or ear, in this case.

Asking other people how to eq is like asking them to tell you what your favorite color is. That guy gets the big bucks because he has a clear and strong vision of how it should be and he interprets the client's vague ideas into a well defined finished product, not because he knows some simple rules of thumb.
 
I think alot of people download those eq charts because they look cool stuck on the wall next to your music stuff, that's why I got mine!
 
I think alot of people download those eq charts because they look cool stuck on the wall next to your music stuff, that's why I got mine!

I was thinking a wall of SK-1s would look cool, but now I'm leaning more towards the chart myself. :D
 
Today I learnt that by overloading/clipping a signal causes a natural compression, and that when done with some anologue gear and desks. It can act as the secret "create a great mix button". so producers used to mix without using this technique to create a great mix and then add it in at the end creating a Brilliant mix.

I also like green JELLY!!!!
 
Back
Top