Rookie review: Tannoy Reveal monitor

  • Thread starter Thread starter getuhgrip
  • Start date Start date
getuhgrip

getuhgrip

Bring Back Transfat!
I was leary of purchasing a monitor rated at 6ohms since I had just purchased a relatively low powered (70 watts) amp rated at 4ohms. The Tannoys were given high praise by several experienced users so I figured if the 70 watts wouldn't drive them, I'd grab another amp this summer.

The Reveals are a beefy 15lbs a peice and though a bit modern looking, they're not unattractive with kind of a mauve on black color scheme.

After setting up my C-Port soundcard (a feat in itself!), I ran its 1/2 outs to the amp and connected the Tannoys. My first test of the card and the monitors was to route wave sounds thru the software mixer and adjust levels.
With the amps gain controls set at half, I clicked the button in "sounds" for the "microsoft sound". I don't know how to do the math to determine what the output level of 70watts into 6ohms equates to, but at half, the wave sound 'bout blew me outta my chair!
Ok, so I run the levels down to about a quarter. Then I tried a song I downloaded from Morpheus: "Urgent" by Foriener. I've always liked this song as a test for speakers because of the extreme range of highs and lows. Lou Grahm's voice is a real good vehicle for examinig mids.
I've never known if the intro to this song is a guitar tuned down a half step, a bass, or if it was done on a synth. In any case, it boomed clearly with no distortion and when the drums came in they sounded crystal clear. During the solo that sounds like a "synth sax" the highs were carried nicely with headroom to spare.
On this digital recording, these speakers sounded as good as the Klipsch 10.5s in my theater. Not as warm and full, but every bit as accurate even at high volumes.

This was also my first test of a new mic (AT4033) and after figuring out the routing for recording between the C-Port and Ntrack I was ready to do some guitar and vocal work.
While I'm still new at recording I was able to get several guitar tracks down using different settings on a Digitech GNX2. I played the same riffs using clean and grungy channels with different effects. On playback all these peices sounded as if they were being played in real time thru my guitar amp. No added warmth or spacial transients, which I guess is the point with reference monitors, right? A bit "anticeptic", but accurate.

On vocals I used the mic straight into the C-Port, and then thru a TubeMP. My voice is 42 yrs old and sounds it! But the point is, this mic/card combination made for some very clear tracks and the Tannoys reported exactly what was going into the computer.
I prefered the signal going thru the tube pre and may look at some higher quality units later.

All in all, during this setup and learning process, I frequently forgot that I was evaluating my first pair of studio monitors. That is, they were there doing their job as nicely as I could hope for and become an un-noticed part of the program.
The 70 watts drives them as high as I would ever need though they are rated to 100watts at 6 ohms.

My thoughts about equipment is to be taken with the fact that I'm new at this and most of the stuff I'm using is the first I've ever owned/tried. Nevertheless, these speakers are consistantly accurate at all levels thru all tonal ranges.
I'll give a plug to this little Samson Servo 150 amp also. I bought it used from a member. Simple operation and runs cool even at high gain for extended periods.
I like really like the 4033 thus far, but again my core of knowledge/experience is limited.

Now, if I could just figure out all the settings on this card and Ntrack!! :confused: :D
 
getuhgrip said:

The Reveals are a beefy 15lbs a peice....

Hey...nice opinions, and thanks for the time to post them.

However, isn't that new $4.00 Wendy's hamburger at least that heavy too?...:p
 
how about sending them this way for a second opinion?.....ill send you my ProtoJ's......:rolleyes:
 
Now why the rolled eyes? Are you not happy with the protos? I almost bought them on your recommendation, but when it comes down to the "Buy" button I always get wishy-washy! :D

If ya really wanna try them, email me a shipping address. I'm going to be in Austria for a couple weeks and won't miss them. Be quick about it though, I'm leaving next thursday.
 
Rick,

Glad to see another happy Reveal owner. I'm powering mine with the Alesis RA-150 and at this stage I find it hard to imagine that upgrading to a Hafler will be very much of an improvement.

And Austria for a couple of weeks? Damn, get that changed to Australia.......lol.

Chris :cool:
 
nah, amigo, i was just kiddin......ive heard the Reveals and they are pretty sweet...... im happy with my PJ's......

beisdes the extra $$$$$, i needed the ProtoJ's lower bass response.......
 
Funny thing but the week I owned my proto-js I didnt notice bass response, so I traded up to monitor ones which had that in spades.

I shouldnt have expected it though because you have to have a sub to round out the set.
 
like i said, i needed the lower bass response....i guess i should have said "less" bass response.....and i dont need a sub with them......
 
Now I understand youy needed to over emphizize the bass to translate to other systems.

Presntly the monitors Im using now dont have Quite the bass response the monitor ones had but are alot more accurate.
 
not exactly why.....i was advised by a very trusted pro member of this BBS that if ill be monitoring in an acoustically challenged room, choose a monitor that has less bass....not one that is so bad it would need a sub, but still less....
 
I just ran Inagoddadivida thru the Tannoys. If they're lacking bass response, it didn't show up on this track. :cool:
 
I can dig how you dont want the reflections from the back wall effecting your judgement. Have you considered difusers maybe even a bookshelf to get rid off those unwanted waves.
 
darrin, nah...the PJ's are a much easier solution for me.....

grip....yeah them Reveals have some booty (bottom)...thats one of the reasons i didnt even consider them......
 
Damn. You just dropped a SHITLOAD of cash, din'tcha?

:D

(congrats, btw. thinking of doing the same thing... i admire your balls!)

(p.s.: nobody take that out of context, ok? lol...)
 
In A Gadda Da Vida............now that's one album I have run through mine yet, but it will be on before I log out the forums:) .

Gidge,
The bass response you were avoiding......how much of that was room acoustics as opposed to the actual Reveals bass output?

:cool:
 
I have a couple of Tannoy Reveal Active.. These are my impressions.

They are a bit too forgiving.
They have poor detail in the highs.
Lower mids gets pretty busy.
VERY poor low end.
Totally great for playing loud rock.
pretty good - for the price -

I have a pair of Dynaudio Audience 70 powered by a Harman/Kardon 680 in the livingroom. They cost a good deal more, but are WAY more accurate.

If I was about to buy monitors today, I'd definitely go for a pair with better high-end detail.. The busy low mids aren't that much of a problem, and the bass can be controlled with headphones..

It has been said many times around here.. Don't save money by buying cheap monitors.. It's hard to buy speakers. It's easy to get charmed by the good sides, and it takes time to hear how they really sound.
 
using headphones to check the low end...never thought of that....
 
and here comes all the flame posts to say that you cant accurately mix with headphones....that subject has been buried in the ground guys, so just move on...theres nothing to see here......
 
Gidge said:
using headphones to check the low end...never thought of that....
Well.. You know how it works, bro. I do the thinking and knowing, you do the typing. :D :D :D
 
Back
Top