Qwerty
New member
This quote comes from long-winded thread over at the Cakewalk forums discussing the perceived quality of Samplitude's audio engine compared to Sonar 3.
Lot's or arguments either way until Ron Kuper from Cakewalk put out some flames of ignorance... Mine included
He then went on to say this -
So why does SONAR 3.1.1 sound better to some? One reason I suspect might because S3.1.1 sets track interleaves to stereo in some cases where SONAR 2 might not. When a track is processed in stereo the panning law is different, so the overall volume level of the mix will change. When comparing S3.1.1 mixes to S2.x it's important to verify that all track interleaves are the same.
What's a track interleave and how would you adjust it in either 2.2 or 3.0?
Huh?
Q.
Lot's or arguments either way until Ron Kuper from Cakewalk put out some flames of ignorance... Mine included
He then went on to say this -
So why does SONAR 3.1.1 sound better to some? One reason I suspect might because S3.1.1 sets track interleaves to stereo in some cases where SONAR 2 might not. When a track is processed in stereo the panning law is different, so the overall volume level of the mix will change. When comparing S3.1.1 mixes to S2.x it's important to verify that all track interleaves are the same.
What's a track interleave and how would you adjust it in either 2.2 or 3.0?
Huh?
Q.