
miroslav
Cosmic Cowboy
Dare I say Katy Perry? Yeah, she may be a bit mediocre, but it sells.
Well...she does the up/down bouncing thing real well. I guess if I had her cleavage, I would do it too....

Dare I say Katy Perry? Yeah, she may be a bit mediocre, but it sells.
Well...she does the up/down bouncing thing real well. I guess if I had her cleavage, I would do it too....![]()
Not really harsh - just realistic. I know plenty of guys who have 'made it'. Major label releases, world tours, sell out theatre venues in 15 minutes. Others who were very popular regional bands - gigging every night, packed houses. Guys who do music for soundtrack, commercial, video games. Seriously talented multi-instrumentalists - drums, guitars, bass, keys, vocals, harmonies. My jaw drops when I hear their stuff, even the stuff they are just doing as a goof. They all are insanely talented, driven and occasionally were in the right place at the right time. I've been content to keep doing what amounts to the digital equivalent of '4-tracking' my whole life - writing songs and giving out cds and mp3s to friends. I never had the the drive, the talent or the luck to pull off anything more than that.
That too shows that "luck" was not what got her to the top.
I just don't like her mainly because of her need to be so weird-extreme in order to get audience attention....but do agree she's pushed hard to get to the top, and has talents...maybe not as a great singer or player...but as an entertainer, for sure.
But I guess weird-extreme is her shtick.
I just wonder how she would do if she just got up and sang, without the weird-extream...but when something works, then you stick to it, I guess.
There have been other artists (Alice Copper comes to mind, and Marilyn Manson) who based their entire careers on weird-extreme.
Maybe I'm just more of a traditional musician, and prefer to let the music, the song, take the light...unless of course you are also a world-class singer/player, in which case your performance also takes the spotlight along with the music...
...but doing Theatre of the Absurd just to sell the music....mmmmm, not my cup-o-tea, though it can be entertaining to watch!![]()
"I don't know that I've ever heard Radio Birdman described as heavy metal before, more like Aus punk circa '75"
Armistice,
You could possibly be correct, but in the early/mid 1970's, bands would come into the studio with their Moody 60watt amps. Birdman came in with this wall of amplifiers and after setting up the mics, I asked them to play something (at that time I had not heard of them, so was unaware as to what was to come!!!!). Their first note, I think blew over the mic stands, cracked the bricks in the walls and I have been deaf ever since!!!!!!!!! Heavy metal or punk, I will let you decide.
Re sending a demo CD, at this time (mainly because I really do not like/understand the music genre --- I know I'm showing my age!!!!!) I am not really looking for a punk act, but if you want to send one (along with some bio material) please feel free to do so. If you apply the LUCK theory that has been raised a number of times in this topic's thread, you never know!!!!!!
David
As much as I love Bowie, he was a product of luck and just being in the right place at the right time too. If he didn't wiggle his way into Warhol's world, no one would ever know who he is.
I don't belive he had any real direct/ongoing influence from Warhol.
...I'm not being baited into a meaningless debate about Bowie with you. Peace brother.
I think it is all a matter of philosophy. I don't believe in luck as way to accomplish anything in life. What you might call luck, I call predestination. For example, you got lucky because this and that person discovered your music. But if you look carefully, this person was predestined to be discovered given the effort he made to write this or that song and to be at the right place at the right time. And like you said, talent has little to do with actually making it.
This argument that there are 1000's of much more skillful musicians out there and if a lesser musician makes it, he just got lucky, is completely false and maybe jaded. Nobody is going to put money, hard cash investment on an artist unless the investor thinks that he can make back his investment. If you look closely at a case by case basis as to why all those great musicians didn't make it you will quickly see that the list of failed attributes out weighed the risk to the investor. List attributes can be age, image, band makeup (e.g. drunk drummer), style, personality, dedication, motivation, flexibility, and of course the songs themselves.
I would describe as preparation.
I've heard bad things about Autism Speaks (e.g. People with autism aren't allowed to speak at their conferences.) You may want to do some research in who you cut that check to.
I did some research on this. You're right. Autism Speaks/Cure Autism Now, while I'm sure they're a decent charity, don't seem to jive with what I think an autism charity should be focused on. It's really semantics and point-of-view. They generally treat autism as a disease and feel it should be eradicated from the planet. That's probably a good idea in regards to kids not even born yet. But that doesn't do anything for the people that already have to deal with autism on a daily basis. "Curing", as if they're broken, an autistic person would involve completely changing who they are. I'm of the opinion that high-functioning autistics can be valuable and productive members of society if the non-autistics of the world were better informed and less ignorant. Anyway, so I think I found a few that are more focused on helping people with autism and less focused on exterminating autism and/or people with autism.
This one looks pretty good....
About ASAN | Autistic Self Advocacy Network
Yup, that looks far more like its focused in helping those all ready struggling with it. They probably get far less funding too...Autism Speaks is huge