I have no time for people like you and really don't care to hear about your "trials" in life and how it made you a better architect
Hmmmmm, did you actually read my post or just scan it. I NEVER said I was an architect. I SAID I design from experience. And I don't design buildings so how the fuck could I plagurize an architect. I also SAID my drawings were taken by architects. So what fuck are you talking about? As I also said, I have earned my opinion, and whether you like it or not is of no consequense.
BTW, if you don't have time, why the fuck did you take the time to "read" my perspective view?
Frankly, yea, maybe I'm an opinionated old fart, so what? I said NOTHING in regards to Shanes talent, nor intent, nor future, nor skills, nor ANYTHING about him personally. My opinion was was testimony to my dealings with certain architects who were arrogant pricks. PERIOD. I have yet to come in contact with one that didn't act as though he could walk on water.
they just hire a consultant and let them worry about it--I think that's a crock. I would never, however, undertake such a design without hiring one. Also, most architectural students don't bother getting any feedback on their designs--what good is that?
Shane, you said it better than I ever could. And good for you. You sound like someone I would not mind interfaceing professionaly with, and I believe you will do justice to your profession. Sincerely, I hope your thesis does well, and you reach your potential in this endeavor. Good luck with your recording also. Don't EVER forget it is the music that is important. Recording science is at the heart of studio design, but without the music, there would be no point. However, the challenges are numerous as I'm sure your aware of. I would think lifting the musicians spirit in an environment such as a studio would also be of utmost importance, although after reading numerous musicians responses from experience in performance in well known studios, designed by architects in this field who will remain nameless, I would say they really didn't have a clue. Time and again on another forum, I've read how certain "professional" studios sounded like crap to the musicians., which if I were in that position, would tend to make my playing uninspired, as NO musician plays well when the acoustics sound like crap. Ask any singer who must sing dry to a track in headphones. Well, enough of my laymans opinion. Again, good luck with your endeavor. And sorry about dragging my professional opinion into this. As you surely know, it doesn't make a damn bit of difference to the world at large. Hey, don't run away either, now that we've got the crap outa the way

WELCOME TO the BBS!! Keep us up to date on your progress, as we ALL are interested in studio design at large. Not just HR, although, after posting on the .alt physics acoustics forum, I get the feeling that acousticians are not interested in small spaces such as the average Homerecording proponents must use. To me, the problems with small room acoustics are inherently below the scope of most professional interest as one acoustician put it...you can't lengthen RT60 in a small room, only shorten it by absorption, and diffusion is done the same way, as most HR rooms are smaller than loz wavelengths, so how can you balance it. Therefore, rooms whose dimensions lie within wavelength are a compromise at best.
If I've somehow misconstrued this, someone please clarify, as it seems difficult to discuss with acousticians who post on other forums, especially as a layman.
fitZ
