I’m not certain that most artists don’t own their work is as valid nowadays. You can of course sell your back catalogue, like some big names did, for the dosh, but most still retain and manage their rights. Drum music should just be treated the same as didgeridoo music, or piano music. The unfair bit is that weird stuff on the net, often with identical wording on US and UK sites that has been shared as fact, and there seems no basis to it using modern legal terminology. We used to consider poetry differently to song lyrics, and still have odd differences in time after death, but the wording on government sites on the net is usually that everything you create is protected as it’s your intellectual property. It’s been fun over the weekend thinking of pieces of music that instantly identify the song by a rhythm, including our queen banging her tea cup in the we will rock you intro.
I never stick up for drummers, but it is demeaning to have your contribution to music knocked down because it lacks pitch and length, when it does have pitch and length before you choke it off?