sjaguar13 said:
My brother's band just got offered a deal from Deftone Records, http://www.deftonerecords.com. They have to pay for 10% of cost, so they have to put up $1,000 within two weeks. Is that normal?
No. Any "record deal" where the artist has to come out of pocket before a track sheet is even laid out is not normal. Any legitimate record label is going to front all recording costs, which they will then recoup from sales.
I didn't check out the site, and I'm not saying they shouldn't do it, but it's not at all normal, and I'd be very suspect.
Despite popular myth, getting signed to a recording contract is rarely a money-maker for an artist (only 1 out of 5 signed to a MAJOR label even get released, and of those, only about 16% ever sell more than 100,000 albums). For indie artists, the sales figures are a lot more grim, although more of them actually get albums released. So statistically, it's a long-shot that any artist signed is ever gonna' sell enough units to pay the label back its recording costs. This is not a huge loss so long as the label eats it and they both walk away, but there's no way I'd advise somebody to put up money as part of a recording contract.
Think about it, lol...that's like paying to go to work.
Anyway...to answer the simple question: No, not normal. Normal is:
Label - Fronts money for recording costs, distribution, and promotion.
Artist - Records material, promotes album, prays a lot.
A big part of the reason I'd be suspect has to do with publishing. The thought of somebody PAYING to record a record for somebody else, and signing away 50% of the publishing rights in the process just makes my skin crawl.
BTW - When a musician pays to record, it's called "booking studio time," lol. THAT's normal.
Best of luck,
Chris