Reaper music Sofware

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Blues
  • Start date Start date
M

Mr Blues

New member
Does anyone know if this software can be brought in major computor stores or is this just available over the Internet the thing is I don't not have a credit card.

Whats the best way of officailly buying one?

Dave
 
The demo will fully function even after 30 days.

Email Justin (the developer) and ask him for other ways to pay. You could send him a check I am sure. The dood sold WinAmp to AOL for something like $10,000,000 USD!!! He probably isn't going to sweat your $40 too much.
 
I have joined the Reaper forums so as to get some tips, does it have a good tutorial and stuff?

Dave
 
Ford Van said:
The dood sold WinAmp to AOL for something like $10,000,000 USD!!!

I didn't know that!

And Reaper is pretty sweet stuff. I'm planning on sinking my $30 into it as well.

Kudos to the original poster for wanting to be an honest person and pay for what he's using.

I've got another question for you, Ford Van. . .

Say I put my $30 in. The versions of Reaper are increasing so rapidly, what happens if version 2.XX or whatever it is now jumps to 3.XX in a month or two or three. Do I have to pay $30 again, or does my $30 cover certain time period?

I've never dealt with software that is upgraded so rapidly before (which is pretty nice, actually).

EDIT: Never mind - the Reaper website clearly answers my question:

"Purchasing a license for REAPER v1.x entitles the user to use, on one computer at a time, past and future versions of REAPER up to and including v1.99."

. . and the price went up to $40.
 
Last edited:
BJW said:
I've never dealt with software that is upgraded so rapidly before (which is pretty nice, actually).

Most of the s/w you own has had thousands of beta testers. Then fine tuned and for the offical version is released.

Using it you are kind of like a beta tester.
Version 2 may cost more but it should be a lot better from all the input from the users.
 
timboZ said:
Most of the s/w you own has had thousands of beta testers. Then fine tuned and for the offical version is released.

Using it you are kind of like a beta tester.

True, never thought if it this way.
 
Reaper is fine,but you should also used cracked versions of the big name software!It's the way to go!
 
beezelbubba said:
Reaper is fine,but you should also used cracked versions of the big name software!It's the way to go!

I see you been talking to Mr T. :D :D :D
 
timboZ said:
Most of the s/w you own has had thousands of beta testers. Then fine tuned and for the offical version is released.

Using it you are kind of like a beta tester.
Version 2 may cost more but it should be a lot better from all the input from the users.

This is a good way of looking at it.

As someone who has been in beta for a lot of different audio software, let me tell you, reaper's "beta team" is FAR larger and more diverse than any I've ever seen.

Normal audio software development goes like this:

1. Customers who bought the last final complain of bugs and BEG on hands and knees for features

2. Company starts building the beta team pool

3. Customers begin massive flame wars, realizing that only 3 or 4 issues will be adressed for the next release and try like hell to make sure it is their issue

4. Company will leave 1 or 2 slots open to actually adress the customers' wants, the other 1 or 2 new issues will be something the company is making to increase market share

5. Company goes into secret squirrel mode and wont even aknowledge whther or not certain BUGS will even be looked at

6. Beta testers, as representatives of their lobbies will begin looking for allies and starting their own massive flame wars on the private beta forums.

7. Company begins purging the beta team, throwing out the losers in the flame wars and also the more vocal

8. Company releases betas to the beta team with the features already locked in place with NO SAY AT ALL from the beta team

9. Beta team looks for bugs in the features they were stuck with

10. The usually once a year release comes out, everyone is pissed

In REAPER it works different

1. Everyone is a beta tester. As shown in the past, show a bug, show a repro for that bug, its likely fixed that day. New release likely that day

2. If a feature is impeeding workflow, or if a feature is needed to increase workflow, present a case for it, refine it with other reaper users, and it is likely to show up. Justin WILL take a look at it and he will ACKNOWLEDGE that he has looked at it

3. No secret squirrel BS in any customer concerns. We DO have secrets once in a while, but they are things coming from left field that we like to surprise people with, such as the new transient operations things. Or certain plugins. These are just "happy pills" someone thinks up once in a while to say "thanks for using REAPER"

4. This is the program YOU designed, you dont have to wait a year for an update, the codebase is ALWAYS being examined
 
pipelineaudio said:
This is a good way of looking at it.
This is the program YOU designed, you dont have to wait a year for an update, the codebase is ALWAYS being examined

We are seeing history in the making...

Thanks for all you do in this Reaper adventure Pipeline and tell Justin there are many a greatful musician / homerecer out there thanks to his efforts and to please keep up the good work and not sell it out when Sony or Steinberg try and by it!

I would assume this is a labor of love being as, as I understand it, after selling winamp he is financially slightly coooool..
 
Back
Top